Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Frank Arntzenius

Biographic Data

ID1069813
NAMEFrank Arntzenius
GIVEN NAMESFrank
FAMILY NAMEArntzenius
SIGNATUREARNTZENIUS F
AFFILIATIONSUniversity of Southern California
VERIFIEDNo
TOTAL WORKS14
TOTAL CITATIONS45
AUTHOR COUNT14
EDITOR COUNT0
FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR1990
LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR2014
H-INDEX4
  • Utilitarianism, Decision Theory and Eternity

    Open Access•Frank Arntzenius•ARTICLE•Philosophical Perspectives•2014•Cited by: 3

  • Time Reversal in Classical Electromagnetism

    Frank Arntzenius, Hilary Greaves•ARTICLE•The British Journal for the…•2009•Cited by: 8•References: 2

    Richard Feynman has claimed that anti-particles are nothing but particles ‘propagating backwards in time’; that time reversing a particle state always turns it into the corresponding anti-particle state. According to standard quantum field theory textbooks this is not so: time reversal does not turn particles into anti-particles. Feynman's view is interesting because, in particular, it suggests a non-standard, and possibly illuminating, interpret…

  • Infinity, Relativity and Smoothness

    Open Access•Frank Arntzenius•ARTICLE•Philosophical Perspectives•2006

  • Time Travel: Double Your Fun

    Open Access•Frank Arntzenius•ARTICLE•Philosophy Compass•2006•Cited by: 1•References: 8

    I start off by relating the standard philosophical account of what time travel is to models of time travel that have recently been discussed by physicists. I then discuss some puzzles associated with time travel. I conclude that philosophers' arguments against time travel are relevant when assessing the likelihood of the occurrence time travel in our world, and are relevant to the assessment whether time travel is physically possible

  • Time reversal operations, representations of the Lorentz group, and the direction of time

    Open Access•Frank Arntzenius•ARTICLE•Studies in History and Philosophy…•2004

  • An arbitrarily short reply to Sheldon Smith on instantaneous velocities

    Open Access•Frank Arntzenius•ARTICLE•Studies in History and Philosophy…•2003

  • Is Quantum Mechanics Pointless

    Open Access•Frank Arntzenius•ARTICLE•Philosophy of Science•2003•Cited by: 4•References: 1

    There exist well-known conundrums, such as measure-theoretic paradoxes and problems of contact, which, within the context of classical physics, can be used to argue against the existence of points in space and space-time. I examine whether quantum mechanics provides additional reasons for supposing that there are no points in space and space-time

  • On What We Know About Chance

    Frank Arntzenius, Ned Hall•ARTICLE•The British Journal for the…•2003•Cited by: 14

    The ‘Principal Principle’ states, roughly, that one's subjective probability for a proposition should conform to one's beliefs about that proposition's objective chance of coming true. David Lewis has argued (i) that this principle provides the defining role for chance; (ii) that it conflicts with his reductionist thesis of Humean supervenience, and so must be replaced by an amended version that avoids the conflict; hence (iii) that nothing perfe…

  • Time, Reality & Experience

    Jan Faye, H Price et al.•BOOK•Time, Reality and Experience•2002

    Why does time seem to flow in one direction? Can we influence the past? Is only the present real? Does relativity conflict with our common understanding of time? How does time relate to free will? Could science do away with time? These questions and others about time are among the most puzzling problems in philosophy and science. In this exciting collection of original articles, eminent philosophers propose novel answers to these and other questi…

  • Mirrors and the Direction of Time

    Open Access•Frank Arntzenius•ARTICLE•Philosophy of Science•1997•Cited by: 4•References: 1

    The frequencies with which photons pass through half-silvered mirrors in the forward direction of time is always approximately 1/2, whereas the frequencies with which photons pass through mirrors in the backward direction in time can be highly time-dependent. I argue that whether one should infer from this time-asymmetric phenomenon that time has an objective direction will depend on one's interpretation of quantum mechanics

  • A Heuristic for Conceptual Change

    Open Access•Frank Arntzenius•ARTICLE•Philosophy of Science•1995•References: 9

    One of our more fundamental beliefs is that causal chains are continuous in time: we believe that every influence from the past upon the future runs through the present. I argue that this tenet, given certain data, can force conceptual changes upon us. I attempt to formulate a heuristic for discovery, based as explicitly as possible upon this tenet, and illustrate it by means of several examples, one of which is Mendel's discovery of genes

  • Spacelike Connections

    Frank Arntzenius•ARTICLE•The British Journal for the…•1994•Cited by: 2•References: 3

  • Physics and common causes

    Open Access•Frank Arntzenius•ARTICLE•Synthese•1990•Cited by: 6•References: 6

  • Causal Paradoxes in Special Relativity

    Frank Arntzenius•ARTICLE•The British Journal for the…•1990•Cited by: 3•References: 6

    It has been argued that the existence of faster than light particles in the context of special relativity would imply the possibility to influence the past, and that this would lead to paradox. In this paper I argue that such conclusions cannot safely be drawn without consideration of the equations of motion of such particles. I show that such equations must be non-local, that they can be deterministic, and that they can avoid the suggested parad…

  • On What We Know About Chance

    Frank Arntzenius, Ned Hall•ARTICLE•The British Journal for the…•2003•Cited by: 14

    The ‘Principal Principle’ states, roughly, that one's subjective probability for a proposition should conform to one's beliefs about that proposition's objective chance of coming true. David Lewis has argued (i) that this principle provides the defining role for chance; (ii) that it conflicts with his reductionist thesis of Humean supervenience, and so must be replaced by an amended version that avoids the conflict; hence (iii) that nothing perfe…

  • Time Reversal in Classical Electromagnetism

    Frank Arntzenius, Hilary Greaves•ARTICLE•The British Journal for the…•2009•Cited by: 8•References: 2

    Richard Feynman has claimed that anti-particles are nothing but particles ‘propagating backwards in time’; that time reversing a particle state always turns it into the corresponding anti-particle state. According to standard quantum field theory textbooks this is not so: time reversal does not turn particles into anti-particles. Feynman's view is interesting because, in particular, it suggests a non-standard, and possibly illuminating, interpret…

  • Physics and common causes

    Open Access•Frank Arntzenius•ARTICLE•Synthese•1990•Cited by: 6•References: 6

  • Is Quantum Mechanics Pointless

    Open Access•Frank Arntzenius•ARTICLE•Philosophy of Science•2003•Cited by: 4•References: 1

    There exist well-known conundrums, such as measure-theoretic paradoxes and problems of contact, which, within the context of classical physics, can be used to argue against the existence of points in space and space-time. I examine whether quantum mechanics provides additional reasons for supposing that there are no points in space and space-time

  • Mirrors and the Direction of Time

    Open Access•Frank Arntzenius•ARTICLE•Philosophy of Science•1997•Cited by: 4•References: 1

    The frequencies with which photons pass through half-silvered mirrors in the forward direction of time is always approximately 1/2, whereas the frequencies with which photons pass through mirrors in the backward direction in time can be highly time-dependent. I argue that whether one should infer from this time-asymmetric phenomenon that time has an objective direction will depend on one's interpretation of quantum mechanics

  • Utilitarianism, Decision Theory and Eternity

    Open Access•Frank Arntzenius•ARTICLE•Philosophical Perspectives•2014•Cited by: 3

  • Causal Paradoxes in Special Relativity

    Frank Arntzenius•ARTICLE•The British Journal for the…•1990•Cited by: 3•References: 6

    It has been argued that the existence of faster than light particles in the context of special relativity would imply the possibility to influence the past, and that this would lead to paradox. In this paper I argue that such conclusions cannot safely be drawn without consideration of the equations of motion of such particles. I show that such equations must be non-local, that they can be deterministic, and that they can avoid the suggested parad…

  • Spacelike Connections

    Frank Arntzenius•ARTICLE•The British Journal for the…•1994•Cited by: 2•References: 3

  • Time Travel: Double Your Fun

    Open Access•Frank Arntzenius•ARTICLE•Philosophy Compass•2006•Cited by: 1•References: 8

    I start off by relating the standard philosophical account of what time travel is to models of time travel that have recently been discussed by physicists. I then discuss some puzzles associated with time travel. I conclude that philosophers' arguments against time travel are relevant when assessing the likelihood of the occurrence time travel in our world, and are relevant to the assessment whether time travel is physically possible

  • Physics and common causes

    Open Access•Frank Arntzenius•ARTICLE•Synthese•1990•Cited by: 6•References: 6

  • Causal Paradoxes in Special Relativity

    Frank Arntzenius•ARTICLE•The British Journal for the…•1990•Cited by: 3•References: 6

    It has been argued that the existence of faster than light particles in the context of special relativity would imply the possibility to influence the past, and that this would lead to paradox. In this paper I argue that such conclusions cannot safely be drawn without consideration of the equations of motion of such particles. I show that such equations must be non-local, that they can be deterministic, and that they can avoid the suggested parad…

  • Spacelike Connections

    Frank Arntzenius•ARTICLE•The British Journal for the…•1994•Cited by: 2•References: 3

  • A Heuristic for Conceptual Change

    Open Access•Frank Arntzenius•ARTICLE•Philosophy of Science•1995•References: 9

    One of our more fundamental beliefs is that causal chains are continuous in time: we believe that every influence from the past upon the future runs through the present. I argue that this tenet, given certain data, can force conceptual changes upon us. I attempt to formulate a heuristic for discovery, based as explicitly as possible upon this tenet, and illustrate it by means of several examples, one of which is Mendel's discovery of genes

  • Mirrors and the Direction of Time

    Open Access•Frank Arntzenius•ARTICLE•Philosophy of Science•1997•Cited by: 4•References: 1

    The frequencies with which photons pass through half-silvered mirrors in the forward direction of time is always approximately 1/2, whereas the frequencies with which photons pass through mirrors in the backward direction in time can be highly time-dependent. I argue that whether one should infer from this time-asymmetric phenomenon that time has an objective direction will depend on one's interpretation of quantum mechanics

  • Time, Reality & Experience

    Jan Faye, H Price et al.•BOOK•Time, Reality and Experience•2002

    Why does time seem to flow in one direction? Can we influence the past? Is only the present real? Does relativity conflict with our common understanding of time? How does time relate to free will? Could science do away with time? These questions and others about time are among the most puzzling problems in philosophy and science. In this exciting collection of original articles, eminent philosophers propose novel answers to these and other questi…

  • An arbitrarily short reply to Sheldon Smith on instantaneous velocities

    Open Access•Frank Arntzenius•ARTICLE•Studies in History and Philosophy…•2003

  • Is Quantum Mechanics Pointless

    Open Access•Frank Arntzenius•ARTICLE•Philosophy of Science•2003•Cited by: 4•References: 1

    There exist well-known conundrums, such as measure-theoretic paradoxes and problems of contact, which, within the context of classical physics, can be used to argue against the existence of points in space and space-time. I examine whether quantum mechanics provides additional reasons for supposing that there are no points in space and space-time

  • On What We Know About Chance

    Frank Arntzenius, Ned Hall•ARTICLE•The British Journal for the…•2003•Cited by: 14

    The ‘Principal Principle’ states, roughly, that one's subjective probability for a proposition should conform to one's beliefs about that proposition's objective chance of coming true. David Lewis has argued (i) that this principle provides the defining role for chance; (ii) that it conflicts with his reductionist thesis of Humean supervenience, and so must be replaced by an amended version that avoids the conflict; hence (iii) that nothing perfe…

  • Time reversal operations, representations of the Lorentz group, and the direction of time

    Open Access•Frank Arntzenius•ARTICLE•Studies in History and Philosophy…•2004

  • Infinity, Relativity and Smoothness

    Open Access•Frank Arntzenius•ARTICLE•Philosophical Perspectives•2006

  • Time Travel: Double Your Fun

    Open Access•Frank Arntzenius•ARTICLE•Philosophy Compass•2006•Cited by: 1•References: 8

    I start off by relating the standard philosophical account of what time travel is to models of time travel that have recently been discussed by physicists. I then discuss some puzzles associated with time travel. I conclude that philosophers' arguments against time travel are relevant when assessing the likelihood of the occurrence time travel in our world, and are relevant to the assessment whether time travel is physically possible

  • Time Reversal in Classical Electromagnetism

    Frank Arntzenius, Hilary Greaves•ARTICLE•The British Journal for the…•2009•Cited by: 8•References: 2

    Richard Feynman has claimed that anti-particles are nothing but particles ‘propagating backwards in time’; that time reversing a particle state always turns it into the corresponding anti-particle state. According to standard quantum field theory textbooks this is not so: time reversal does not turn particles into anti-particles. Feynman's view is interesting because, in particular, it suggests a non-standard, and possibly illuminating, interpret…

  • Utilitarianism, Decision Theory and Eternity

    Open Access•Frank Arntzenius•ARTICLE•Philosophical Perspectives•2014•Cited by: 3

Computer Science (9 works) · Epistemology (8 works) · Philosophy (8 works) · Physics (8 works) · Quantum Mechanics and Applications (8 works) · Theoretical physics (8 works) · Mathematics (6 works) · Quantum mechanics (5 works) · Classical mechanics (4 works) · Philosophy and History of Science (4 works)

Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae