W David Clinton

Biographic Data

ID1071791
NAMEW David Clinton
GIVEN NAMESW David
FAMILY NAMEClinton
SIGNATURECLINTON W D
VERIFIEDNo
TOTAL WORKS6
TOTAL CITATIONS10
WORKS AS AUTHOR6
WORKS AS EDITOR0
FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR1986
LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR1995
H-INDEX3

  • The Two Faces of National Interest

    Ralph B Levering, W David ClintonARTICLEJournal of American History1995Cited by: 3

    Journal Article The Two Faces of National Interest. By W. David Clinton. (Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press, 1994. xvi, 278 pp. Cloth, $35.00, ISBN 0-8071-1841-9. Paper, $15.95, ISBN 0-8071-1895-8.) Get access Ralph B. Levering Ralph B. Levering Davidson College, Davidson, North Carolina Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar Journal of American History, Volume 82, Issue 1, June 1995, Page 377, https:…

  • The Two Faces of National Interest

    Francis Fukuyama, W David ClintonARTICLEForeign Affairs1994

  • The Transition

    Brewster C Denny, Frederick C Mosher et al.ARTICLEPublic Administration Review1988

  • Presidential Transitions and Foreign Affairs

    Ralph B Levering, Frederick C Mosher et al.ARTICLEJournal of American History1987

    Journal Article Presidential Transitions and Foreign Affairs. By Frederick C. Mosher, W. David Clinton, and Daniel G. Lang. (Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press, 1987. xvii + 281 pp. $25.00.) Get access Ralph B. Levering Ralph B. Levering Davidson College Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar Journal of American History, Volume 74, Issue 3, December 1987, Pages 1095–1096, https://doi.org/10.2307/190223…

  • Presidential Transitions and Foreign Affairs

    Gaddis Smith, Frederick C Mosher et al.ARTICLEForeign Affairs1987Cited by: 3

  • The National Interest

    Open AccessW David ClintonARTICLEThe Review of Politics1986Cited by: 4References: 15

    The national interest” is frequently criticized in the contemporary study of international relations as an ambiguous term that lends itself to the support of unethical state policies by justifying single-minded national selfishness. This article argues that much of the criticism of the national interest on normative grounds in fact derives from confusion over the meaning of the concept. It separates two meanings — national interest as the common …