Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Marie Hojnacki

Biographic Data

ID1077575
NAMEMarie Hojnacki
GIVEN NAMESMarie
FAMILY NAMEHojnacki
SIGNATUREHOJNACKI M
AFFILIATIONSPennsylvania State University
VERIFIEDNo
TOTAL WORKS15
TOTAL CITATIONS691
WORKS AS AUTHOR15
WORKS AS EDITOR0
FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR1992
LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR2015
H-INDEX10
  • Assessing business advantage in Washington lobbying

    Open Access•Marie Hojnacki, Kathleen Marchetti et al.•ARTICLE•Interest Groups & Advocacy•2015•Cited by: 10•References: 22

  • Images of an Unbiased Interest System

    David Lowery, F R Baumgartner et al.•ARTICLE•Journal of European Public Policy•2015•Cited by: 50•References: 40

    Since political scientists were introduced to the concept of ‘the scope and bias of the pressure system’ by Schattschneider more than half a century ago, we have grappled with the lack of a standard against which to assess bias. Still, scholars have c

  • Who cares about the lobbying agenda

    Open Access•David C Kimball, F R Baumgartner et al.•ARTICLE•Interest Groups & Advocacy•2012•Cited by: 15•References: 23

  • Studying Organizational Advocacy and Influence

    Marie Hojnacki, David C Kimball et al.•ARTICLE•Annual Review of Political Science•2012•Cited by: 112•References: 112

    In Basic Interests: The Importance of Groups in Politics and in Political Science (1998) , Frank Baumgartner and Beth Leech characterized a series of problems in the interest group research published between 1950 and 1995. In this article, we assess whether recent research has become more theoretically coherent, more attentive to context, and broader in both scope and topical focus, all of which are crucial to advancing the systematic study of in…

  • Lobbying and Policy Change

    F R Baumgartner, Jeffrey M Berry et al.•BOOK•Lobbying and Policy Change•2009

  • Interest Groups, Lobbying, and Participation in America . Kenneth M. Goldstein The Populist Paradox

    Marie Hojnacki•ARTICLE•The Journal of Politics•2001

  • PAC Contributions and Lobbying Contacts in Congressional Committees

    Open Access•Marie Hojnacki, David C Kimball•ARTICLE•Political Research Quarterly•2001•Cited by: 38•References: 22

    Researchers and political observers often assume that campaign contributions help political action committees (PACs) and their affiliated lobbyists gain access to members of Congress. But empirical studies demonstrating that contributions purchase access are extremely rare. In this paper, we compare the degree to which organized interests with PACs have more contact with members of Congress than groups without an affiliated PAC, and we also ident…

  • The Lobbying Activities of Organized Interests in Federal Judicial Nominations

    Gregory A Caldeira, Marie Hojnacki et al.•ARTICLE•The Journal of Politics•2000•Cited by: 25•References: 11

    Techniques of modern lobbying provide organized interests a variety of tactical options. How does the mix of tactics employed by groups vary across different lobbying campaigns? When, and why, will groups use some tactics and not others? Prior research points to organizational structure and resources, features of the issue, and institutional forces as crucial determinants of lobbying. We analyze patterns of advocacy using data from a survey of in…

  • The Conspicuous Corporation

    Marie Hojnacki•ARTICLE•The Journal of Politics•1999

  • The Who and How of Organizations' Lobbying Strategies in Committee

    Marie Hojnacki, David C Kimball•ARTICLE•The Journal of Politics•1999•Cited by: 79•References: 20

    We examine the forces affecting organized interests' decisions to use particular lobbying tactics to target different legislators in committee, using the group-legislator dyad as our unit of analysis. Two basic assumptions underlie our conceptual model of lobbying strategies in committee. First, organizations have legislative goals of expanding the size of their supportive coalitions and shaping the content of legislative proposals, and an ongoin…

  • Organized Interests' Advocacy Behavior in Alliances

    Marie Hojnacki•ARTICLE•Political Research Quarterly•1998

  • Organized Interests' Advocacy Behavior in Alliances

    Open Access•Marie Hojnacki•ARTICLE•Political Research Quarterly•1998•Cited by: 48•References: 19

    In this article I examine how the characteristics of a coalition can affect the incentives an organization has to contribute to a collective advocacy effort. Although groups working in coalition have opportunities to free- ride on the efforts of their allies, the opportunity to develop a reputation as an advocate may provide a selective incentive to contribute. Reputa tions are important because of the information they convey to potential allies …

  • Organized Interests and the Decision of Whom to Lobby in Congress

    Open Access•Marie Hojnacki, David C Kimball•ARTICLE•American Political Science Review•1998•Cited by: 147•References: 27

    In a departure from previous research, we focus on the dyadic relationship between lobbyists and committee members in the House of Representatives in order to test hypotheses about what factors shape the decisions of individual groups to lobby individual committee members. Our primary assumption is that organized interests seek to expand their supportive coalitions and affect the content and fate of bills referred to committees. In order to accom…

  • Interest Groups' Decisions to Join Alliances or Work Alone

    Marie Hojnacki•ARTICLE•American Journal of Political…•1997•Cited by: 144•References: 12

    Theory: The benefits of coalitional advocacy in a crowded group environment, and the organization maintenance costs imposed on groups that seek to work as part of alliances are used to develop a model of organized interests' decisions to join alliances or work alone. Hypotheses: Organizations estimate whether an alliance is likely to improve their chances for success relative to working alone. The forces that affect this estimate derive from the …

  • "New-Style" Judicial Campaigns and the Voters

    Open Access•Marie Hojnacki, Lawrence Baum•ARTICLE•The Western Political Quarterly•1992•Cited by: 23•References: 20

  • Organized Interests and the Decision of Whom to Lobby in Congress

    Open Access•Marie Hojnacki, David C Kimball•ARTICLE•American Political Science Review•1998•Cited by: 147•References: 27

    In a departure from previous research, we focus on the dyadic relationship between lobbyists and committee members in the House of Representatives in order to test hypotheses about what factors shape the decisions of individual groups to lobby individual committee members. Our primary assumption is that organized interests seek to expand their supportive coalitions and affect the content and fate of bills referred to committees. In order to accom…

  • Interest Groups' Decisions to Join Alliances or Work Alone

    Marie Hojnacki•ARTICLE•American Journal of Political…•1997•Cited by: 144•References: 12

    Theory: The benefits of coalitional advocacy in a crowded group environment, and the organization maintenance costs imposed on groups that seek to work as part of alliances are used to develop a model of organized interests' decisions to join alliances or work alone. Hypotheses: Organizations estimate whether an alliance is likely to improve their chances for success relative to working alone. The forces that affect this estimate derive from the …

  • Studying Organizational Advocacy and Influence

    Marie Hojnacki, David C Kimball et al.•ARTICLE•Annual Review of Political Science•2012•Cited by: 112•References: 112

    In Basic Interests: The Importance of Groups in Politics and in Political Science (1998) , Frank Baumgartner and Beth Leech characterized a series of problems in the interest group research published between 1950 and 1995. In this article, we assess whether recent research has become more theoretically coherent, more attentive to context, and broader in both scope and topical focus, all of which are crucial to advancing the systematic study of in…

  • The Who and How of Organizations' Lobbying Strategies in Committee

    Marie Hojnacki, David C Kimball•ARTICLE•The Journal of Politics•1999•Cited by: 79•References: 20

    We examine the forces affecting organized interests' decisions to use particular lobbying tactics to target different legislators in committee, using the group-legislator dyad as our unit of analysis. Two basic assumptions underlie our conceptual model of lobbying strategies in committee. First, organizations have legislative goals of expanding the size of their supportive coalitions and shaping the content of legislative proposals, and an ongoin…

  • Images of an Unbiased Interest System

    David Lowery, F R Baumgartner et al.•ARTICLE•Journal of European Public Policy•2015•Cited by: 50•References: 40

    Since political scientists were introduced to the concept of ‘the scope and bias of the pressure system’ by Schattschneider more than half a century ago, we have grappled with the lack of a standard against which to assess bias. Still, scholars have c

  • Organized Interests' Advocacy Behavior in Alliances

    Open Access•Marie Hojnacki•ARTICLE•Political Research Quarterly•1998•Cited by: 48•References: 19

    In this article I examine how the characteristics of a coalition can affect the incentives an organization has to contribute to a collective advocacy effort. Although groups working in coalition have opportunities to free- ride on the efforts of their allies, the opportunity to develop a reputation as an advocate may provide a selective incentive to contribute. Reputa tions are important because of the information they convey to potential allies …

  • PAC Contributions and Lobbying Contacts in Congressional Committees

    Open Access•Marie Hojnacki, David C Kimball•ARTICLE•Political Research Quarterly•2001•Cited by: 38•References: 22

    Researchers and political observers often assume that campaign contributions help political action committees (PACs) and their affiliated lobbyists gain access to members of Congress. But empirical studies demonstrating that contributions purchase access are extremely rare. In this paper, we compare the degree to which organized interests with PACs have more contact with members of Congress than groups without an affiliated PAC, and we also ident…

  • The Lobbying Activities of Organized Interests in Federal Judicial Nominations

    Gregory A Caldeira, Marie Hojnacki et al.•ARTICLE•The Journal of Politics•2000•Cited by: 25•References: 11

    Techniques of modern lobbying provide organized interests a variety of tactical options. How does the mix of tactics employed by groups vary across different lobbying campaigns? When, and why, will groups use some tactics and not others? Prior research points to organizational structure and resources, features of the issue, and institutional forces as crucial determinants of lobbying. We analyze patterns of advocacy using data from a survey of in…

  • "New-Style" Judicial Campaigns and the Voters

    Open Access•Marie Hojnacki, Lawrence Baum•ARTICLE•The Western Political Quarterly•1992•Cited by: 23•References: 20

  • Who cares about the lobbying agenda

    Open Access•David C Kimball, F R Baumgartner et al.•ARTICLE•Interest Groups & Advocacy•2012•Cited by: 15•References: 23

  • Assessing business advantage in Washington lobbying

    Open Access•Marie Hojnacki, Kathleen Marchetti et al.•ARTICLE•Interest Groups & Advocacy•2015•Cited by: 10•References: 22

  • "New-Style" Judicial Campaigns and the Voters

    Open Access•Marie Hojnacki, Lawrence Baum•ARTICLE•The Western Political Quarterly•1992•Cited by: 23•References: 20

  • Interest Groups' Decisions to Join Alliances or Work Alone

    Marie Hojnacki•ARTICLE•American Journal of Political…•1997•Cited by: 144•References: 12

    Theory: The benefits of coalitional advocacy in a crowded group environment, and the organization maintenance costs imposed on groups that seek to work as part of alliances are used to develop a model of organized interests' decisions to join alliances or work alone. Hypotheses: Organizations estimate whether an alliance is likely to improve their chances for success relative to working alone. The forces that affect this estimate derive from the …

  • Organized Interests' Advocacy Behavior in Alliances

    Marie Hojnacki•ARTICLE•Political Research Quarterly•1998

  • Organized Interests' Advocacy Behavior in Alliances

    Open Access•Marie Hojnacki•ARTICLE•Political Research Quarterly•1998•Cited by: 48•References: 19

    In this article I examine how the characteristics of a coalition can affect the incentives an organization has to contribute to a collective advocacy effort. Although groups working in coalition have opportunities to free- ride on the efforts of their allies, the opportunity to develop a reputation as an advocate may provide a selective incentive to contribute. Reputa tions are important because of the information they convey to potential allies …

  • Organized Interests and the Decision of Whom to Lobby in Congress

    Open Access•Marie Hojnacki, David C Kimball•ARTICLE•American Political Science Review•1998•Cited by: 147•References: 27

    In a departure from previous research, we focus on the dyadic relationship between lobbyists and committee members in the House of Representatives in order to test hypotheses about what factors shape the decisions of individual groups to lobby individual committee members. Our primary assumption is that organized interests seek to expand their supportive coalitions and affect the content and fate of bills referred to committees. In order to accom…

  • The Conspicuous Corporation

    Marie Hojnacki•ARTICLE•The Journal of Politics•1999

  • The Who and How of Organizations' Lobbying Strategies in Committee

    Marie Hojnacki, David C Kimball•ARTICLE•The Journal of Politics•1999•Cited by: 79•References: 20

    We examine the forces affecting organized interests' decisions to use particular lobbying tactics to target different legislators in committee, using the group-legislator dyad as our unit of analysis. Two basic assumptions underlie our conceptual model of lobbying strategies in committee. First, organizations have legislative goals of expanding the size of their supportive coalitions and shaping the content of legislative proposals, and an ongoin…

  • The Lobbying Activities of Organized Interests in Federal Judicial Nominations

    Gregory A Caldeira, Marie Hojnacki et al.•ARTICLE•The Journal of Politics•2000•Cited by: 25•References: 11

    Techniques of modern lobbying provide organized interests a variety of tactical options. How does the mix of tactics employed by groups vary across different lobbying campaigns? When, and why, will groups use some tactics and not others? Prior research points to organizational structure and resources, features of the issue, and institutional forces as crucial determinants of lobbying. We analyze patterns of advocacy using data from a survey of in…

  • Interest Groups, Lobbying, and Participation in America . Kenneth M. Goldstein The Populist Paradox

    Marie Hojnacki•ARTICLE•The Journal of Politics•2001

  • PAC Contributions and Lobbying Contacts in Congressional Committees

    Open Access•Marie Hojnacki, David C Kimball•ARTICLE•Political Research Quarterly•2001•Cited by: 38•References: 22

    Researchers and political observers often assume that campaign contributions help political action committees (PACs) and their affiliated lobbyists gain access to members of Congress. But empirical studies demonstrating that contributions purchase access are extremely rare. In this paper, we compare the degree to which organized interests with PACs have more contact with members of Congress than groups without an affiliated PAC, and we also ident…

  • Lobbying and Policy Change

    F R Baumgartner, Jeffrey M Berry et al.•BOOK•Lobbying and Policy Change•2009

  • Who cares about the lobbying agenda

    Open Access•David C Kimball, F R Baumgartner et al.•ARTICLE•Interest Groups & Advocacy•2012•Cited by: 15•References: 23

  • Studying Organizational Advocacy and Influence

    Marie Hojnacki, David C Kimball et al.•ARTICLE•Annual Review of Political Science•2012•Cited by: 112•References: 112

    In Basic Interests: The Importance of Groups in Politics and in Political Science (1998) , Frank Baumgartner and Beth Leech characterized a series of problems in the interest group research published between 1950 and 1995. In this article, we assess whether recent research has become more theoretically coherent, more attentive to context, and broader in both scope and topical focus, all of which are crucial to advancing the systematic study of in…

  • Assessing business advantage in Washington lobbying

    Open Access•Marie Hojnacki, Kathleen Marchetti et al.•ARTICLE•Interest Groups & Advocacy•2015•Cited by: 10•References: 22

  • Images of an Unbiased Interest System

    David Lowery, F R Baumgartner et al.•ARTICLE•Journal of European Public Policy•2015•Cited by: 50•References: 40

    Since political scientists were introduced to the concept of ‘the scope and bias of the pressure system’ by Schattschneider more than half a century ago, we have grappled with the lack of a standard against which to assess bias. Still, scholars have c

Political science (15 works) · Law (13 works) · Law (11 works) · Political Influence and Corporate Strategies (11 works) · Public Administration (9 works) · Public Administration (9 works) · Public relations (9 works) · Electoral Systems and Political Participation (8 works) · Politics (7 works) · Sociology (7 works)

Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae