John C Lamoreaux
Biographic Data
| ID | 1081021 |
|---|---|
| NAME | John C Lamoreaux |
| GIVEN NAMES | John C |
| FAMILY NAME | Lamoreaux |
| SIGNATURE | LAMOREAUX J C |
| AFFILIATIONS | Princeton Theological Seminary |
| VERIFIED | No |
| TOTAL WORKS | 7 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 0 |
| WORKS AS AUTHOR | 7 |
| WORKS AS EDITOR | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 1993 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2024 |
| H-INDEX | 0 |
Reason and Revelation in Byzantine Antioch
An Early Dormition Narrative in Karshuni
Le présent article fournit la première édition critique complète d’une forme brève du récit apocryphe de la Dormition de Marie en Six Livres. Un fragment syriaque de cette version était connu depuis 1865 (CANT 121) et était communément considéré comme la forme la plus ancienne de la Dormition en Six Livres et comme dépendant du texte grec du Pseudo-Jean. Le texte arabe karchouni publié ici donne maintenant accès à cette version dans son intégrali…
Cross Veneration in the Medieval Islamic World
Cross Veneration in the Medieval Islamic World: Christian Identity and Practice under Muslim Rule. By Charles Tieszen. The Early and Medieval Islam World, vol. 1. London: I.B. Tauris, 2017. Pp. x + 229. $95
John of Scythopolis and the Dionysian Corpus
John, the sixth-century orthodox bishop of Scythopolis in Palestine, was the first of many authors to comment upon the highly influential Pseudo–Dionysian writings (such as The Mystical Theology). Here translated and interpreted, John's Prologue and Scholia (marginalia) have only recently been separable from later comments. They present his complex theological and philosophical observations on the Dionysian texts. The book begins with the general…
The Earliest Reception of the Dionysian Corpus
This chapter examines the earliest reception of the Dionysian corpus in religious circles. It analyses evidence on Severus' use of the corpus in the 520s and argues against the common view that he had pre-empted the Dionysian corpus in an offensive strike against the Chalcedonians. It discusses Hypatius' rejection of the works of Dionysius and his objection to Monophysite use of the corpus. This chapter concludes that the corpus was used by almos…
The Provenance of Ecumenius' Commentary On the Apocalypse
The earliest extant Greek commentary on the Apocalypse was written by a certain Ecumenius. Many questions surround the provenance of this commentary. Was it written early in the sixth century or does it rather stem from the later decades of that same century? Was it written by a Monophysite? or by a Chalcedonian? Was the author of this commentary a friend and ally of Severus of Antioch? If not, who then was he? Such questions are important becaus…
John of Scythopolis on Apollinarian Christology and the Pseudo-Areopagite's True Identity
As is well known, theCorpus Dionysiacum(CD) first appeared on the stage of history in the first quarter of the sixth century; what is less well known is that within a generation of its appearance the CD was commented upon by an Orthodox author, John of Scythopolis (d.c. 548). Thereafter, the CD was circulated in a much expanded format-prefaced with John'sPrologueand annotated with hisScholia. John's interpretive work, so close in time to the comp…
No prominent works on this page.
John of Scythopolis on Apollinarian Christology and the Pseudo-Areopagite's True Identity
As is well known, theCorpus Dionysiacum(CD) first appeared on the stage of history in the first quarter of the sixth century; what is less well known is that within a generation of its appearance the CD was commented upon by an Orthodox author, John of Scythopolis (d.c. 548). Thereafter, the CD was circulated in a much expanded format-prefaced with John'sPrologueand annotated with hisScholia. John's interpretive work, so close in time to the comp…
John of Scythopolis and the Dionysian Corpus
John, the sixth-century orthodox bishop of Scythopolis in Palestine, was the first of many authors to comment upon the highly influential Pseudo–Dionysian writings (such as The Mystical Theology). Here translated and interpreted, John's Prologue and Scholia (marginalia) have only recently been separable from later comments. They present his complex theological and philosophical observations on the Dionysian texts. The book begins with the general…
The Earliest Reception of the Dionysian Corpus
This chapter examines the earliest reception of the Dionysian corpus in religious circles. It analyses evidence on Severus' use of the corpus in the 520s and argues against the common view that he had pre-empted the Dionysian corpus in an offensive strike against the Chalcedonians. It discusses Hypatius' rejection of the works of Dionysius and his objection to Monophysite use of the corpus. This chapter concludes that the corpus was used by almos…
The Provenance of Ecumenius' Commentary On the Apocalypse
The earliest extant Greek commentary on the Apocalypse was written by a certain Ecumenius. Many questions surround the provenance of this commentary. Was it written early in the sixth century or does it rather stem from the later decades of that same century? Was it written by a Monophysite? or by a Chalcedonian? Was the author of this commentary a friend and ally of Severus of Antioch? If not, who then was he? Such questions are important becaus…
Cross Veneration in the Medieval Islamic World
Cross Veneration in the Medieval Islamic World: Christian Identity and Practice under Muslim Rule. By Charles Tieszen. The Early and Medieval Islam World, vol. 1. London: I.B. Tauris, 2017. Pp. x + 229. $95
An Early Dormition Narrative in Karshuni
Le présent article fournit la première édition critique complète d’une forme brève du récit apocryphe de la Dormition de Marie en Six Livres. Un fragment syriaque de cette version était connu depuis 1865 (CANT 121) et était communément considéré comme la forme la plus ancienne de la Dormition en Six Livres et comme dépendant du texte grec du Pseudo-Jean. Le texte arabe karchouni publié ici donne maintenant accès à cette version dans son intégrali…
Reason and Revelation in Byzantine Antioch
History (7 works) · Art (6 works) · Classics (6 works) · Historical and Linguistic Studies (6 works) · Literature (5 works) · Philosophy (5 works) · Theology (5 works) · Archaeology and Historical Studies (4 works) · Biblical Studies and Interpretation (4 works) · Byzantine Studies and History (3 works)