Jamie Mckeown
Biographic Data
| ID | 1087453 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Jamie Mckeown |
| GIVEN NAMES | Jamie |
| FAMILY NAME | Mckeown |
| SIGNATURE | MCKEOWN J |
| AFFILIATIONS | Hong Kong Polytechnic University |
| ORCID | 0000-0002-1744-7007 |
| VERIFIED | Yes |
| TOTAL WORKS | 9 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 9 |
| AUTHOR COUNT | 9 |
| EDITOR COUNT | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2015 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2026 |
| H-INDEX | 2 |
A corpus-assisted discourse analysis of (Dis)Interest and (Un)Importance frames in leave to appeal decisions of the HKSAR appellate courts
This study presents a corpus-assisted discourse analysis examining the semantic frames of (Dis)Interest and (Un)Importance in leave to appeal decisions of the HKSAR appellate courts. With the use of two corpora — Approve (67,694 tokens) and Dismiss (143,462 tokens) — the research investigated the construction and use of (Dis)Interest and (Un)Importance frames. A further distinction of performative versus descriptive use informed the analysis. In …
A contrastive investigation of the performative and descriptive use of surprise frames in judicial opinions of the HKSAR
Examining the use of reflexive metadiscourse in the construction of affiliative communication in group email requests
This qualitative study examines how male-identified and female-identified individuals use reflexive metadiscourse in the construction of affiliative communication, i.e., a mode of communication traditionally coded as feminine. Specifically, it examines requests made in the public context of group email. Both reflexive metadiscourse and affiliative communication are analysed with the concept of indexicality, and two novel sub-categories (i.e., dir…
A comparative investigation of metadiscursive clarifying devices in the abortion discourse of the U.S. Supreme Court
Based on previous research that identified metadiscursive clarifiers as a means of discursive control and subversion, this study investigates the use of the devices in the abortion discourse of the U.S. Supreme court. It examines four sub-genres of judicial opinion (majority opinions, dissents, regular concurrences, and special concurrences) and their contribution to the development of this area of law. The quantitative analysis reveals that the …
A corpus-based examination of reflexive metadiscourse in majority and dissent opinions of the U.S. Supreme Court
Exploring dominance-linked reflexive metadiscourse in moderated group discussions
Quilting Muslims
Exploring the metadiscursive realisation of incivility in TV news discourse
Socio-pragmatic influence on opening salutation and closing valediction of British workplace email
A corpus-based examination of reflexive metadiscourse in majority and dissent opinions of the U.S. Supreme Court
Exploring dominance-linked reflexive metadiscourse in moderated group discussions
A contrastive investigation of the performative and descriptive use of surprise frames in judicial opinions of the HKSAR
Exploring the metadiscursive realisation of incivility in TV news discourse
Socio-pragmatic influence on opening salutation and closing valediction of British workplace email
Socio-pragmatic influence on opening salutation and closing valediction of British workplace email
Exploring the metadiscursive realisation of incivility in TV news discourse
Exploring dominance-linked reflexive metadiscourse in moderated group discussions
Quilting Muslims
A corpus-based examination of reflexive metadiscourse in majority and dissent opinions of the U.S. Supreme Court
A comparative investigation of metadiscursive clarifying devices in the abortion discourse of the U.S. Supreme Court
Based on previous research that identified metadiscursive clarifiers as a means of discursive control and subversion, this study investigates the use of the devices in the abortion discourse of the U.S. Supreme court. It examines four sub-genres of judicial opinion (majority opinions, dissents, regular concurrences, and special concurrences) and their contribution to the development of this area of law. The quantitative analysis reveals that the …
Examining the use of reflexive metadiscourse in the construction of affiliative communication in group email requests
This qualitative study examines how male-identified and female-identified individuals use reflexive metadiscourse in the construction of affiliative communication, i.e., a mode of communication traditionally coded as feminine. Specifically, it examines requests made in the public context of group email. Both reflexive metadiscourse and affiliative communication are analysed with the concept of indexicality, and two novel sub-categories (i.e., dir…
A contrastive investigation of the performative and descriptive use of surprise frames in judicial opinions of the HKSAR
A corpus-assisted discourse analysis of (Dis)Interest and (Un)Importance frames in leave to appeal decisions of the HKSAR appellate courts
This study presents a corpus-assisted discourse analysis examining the semantic frames of (Dis)Interest and (Un)Importance in leave to appeal decisions of the HKSAR appellate courts. With the use of two corpora — Approve (67,694 tokens) and Dismiss (143,462 tokens) — the research investigated the construction and use of (Dis)Interest and (Un)Importance frames. A further distinction of performative versus descriptive use informed the analysis. In …
Sociology (8 works) · Linguistics (7 works) · Psychology (6 works) · Discourse Analysis in Language Studies (5 works) · Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies (5 works) · Political science (5 works) · Social Psychology (5 works) · Law (4 works) · Metadiscourse (4 works) · Politics (4 works)