Annette Hautli-Janisz
Biographic Data
| ID | 1095589 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Annette Hautli-Janisz |
| GIVEN NAMES | Annette |
| FAMILY NAME | Hautli-Janisz |
| SIGNATURE | HAUTLI-JANISZ A |
| AFFILIATIONS | University of Passau |
| ORCID | 0000-0002-5901-9633 |
| VERIFIED | Yes |
| TOTAL WORKS | 4 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 7 |
| WORKS AS AUTHOR | 4 |
| WORKS AS EDITOR | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2022 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2026 |
| H-INDEX | 1 |
The dynamics of framing in dialogue
In this paper, we propose a fine-grained, empirically-driven formalisation of framing in discourse, with a particular focus on dialogical interaction. This formalisation provides an operationalization of framing that lays the foundation for subsequently (i) designing guidelines for the annotation of framing moves in large-scale dialogue datasets and (ii) implementing computational models that can be informed with the necessary cornerstones of lin…
A large-scale comparison of human-written versus ChatGPT-generated essays
ChatGPT and similar generative AI models have attracted hundreds of millions of users and have become part of the public discourse. Many believe that such models will disrupt society and lead to significant changes in the education system and information generation. So far, this belief is based on either colloquial evidence or benchmarks from the owners of the models—both lack scientific rigor. We systematically assess the quality of AI-generated…
Conventional Implicatures in Argumentation
Despite the ubiquity of conventional implicatures in language and the critical role they play in argumentation, they have heretofore been almost entirely absent from theories of argument and the linguistic expression of reasoning. In this paper, we discuss conventional implicatures (cis) as an interesting phenomenon at the interface of semantics, pragmatics and argumentation by harnessing research in semantics and pragmatics and extending an exis…
Questions in argumentative dialogue
Despite questions having a long-standing history in theoretical linguistics, the interface between empirically grounded corpus linguistics of questioning behaviour and analytically driven pragmatic theory of question structure and context has received significantly less attention. This paper aims to contribute to this field of research by showing that a four-way categorisation into question types, namely, pure questioning, assertive questioning, …
Questions in argumentative dialogue
Despite questions having a long-standing history in theoretical linguistics, the interface between empirically grounded corpus linguistics of questioning behaviour and analytically driven pragmatic theory of question structure and context has received significantly less attention. This paper aims to contribute to this field of research by showing that a four-way categorisation into question types, namely, pure questioning, assertive questioning, …
Conventional Implicatures in Argumentation
Despite the ubiquity of conventional implicatures in language and the critical role they play in argumentation, they have heretofore been almost entirely absent from theories of argument and the linguistic expression of reasoning. In this paper, we discuss conventional implicatures (cis) as an interesting phenomenon at the interface of semantics, pragmatics and argumentation by harnessing research in semantics and pragmatics and extending an exis…
Questions in argumentative dialogue
Despite questions having a long-standing history in theoretical linguistics, the interface between empirically grounded corpus linguistics of questioning behaviour and analytically driven pragmatic theory of question structure and context has received significantly less attention. This paper aims to contribute to this field of research by showing that a four-way categorisation into question types, namely, pure questioning, assertive questioning, …
A large-scale comparison of human-written versus ChatGPT-generated essays
ChatGPT and similar generative AI models have attracted hundreds of millions of users and have become part of the public discourse. Many believe that such models will disrupt society and lead to significant changes in the education system and information generation. So far, this belief is based on either colloquial evidence or benchmarks from the owners of the models—both lack scientific rigor. We systematically assess the quality of AI-generated…
The dynamics of framing in dialogue
In this paper, we propose a fine-grained, empirically-driven formalisation of framing in discourse, with a particular focus on dialogical interaction. This formalisation provides an operationalization of framing that lays the foundation for subsequently (i) designing guidelines for the annotation of framing moves in large-scale dialogue datasets and (ii) implementing computational models that can be informed with the necessary cornerstones of lin…
Argumentation theory (3 works) · Computer Science (3 works) · Epistemology (3 works) · Linguistics (3 works) · Argument (complex analysis (2 works) · Argumentative (2 works) · Artificial Intelligence (2 works) · Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies (2 works) · Language, Metaphor, and Cognition (2 works) · Linguistics and Discourse Analysis (2 works)