Larry T Aspin
Dados Biográficos
| ID | 1102463 |
|---|---|
| NOME | Larry T Aspin |
| PRENOMES | Larry T |
| SOBRENOME | Aspin |
| ASSINATURA | ASPIN L T |
| AFILIAÇÕES | Bradley University |
| VERIFICADO | Não |
| TOTAL DE OBRAS | 7 |
| TOTAL DE CITAÇÕES | 38 |
| TOTAL COMO AUTOR | 7 |
| TOTAL COMO EDITOR | 0 |
| PRIMEIRO ANO DE PUBLICAÇÃO | 1987 |
| ANO MAIS RECENTE DE PUBLICAÇÃO | 2000 |
| ÍNDICE H | 4 |
Thirty years of judicial retention elections
This article updates prior reports on the empirical patterns and trends in judicial retention elections. The 3,912 elections encompass both major trial court and appellate court elections in ten states for the period from 1964 through 1994. Reported trends include declines in the affirmative vote, rolloff, and voter differentiation among individual judges. Detailed analysis of defeated judges indicates that regular retention voters quickly remove…
Friends and Neighbors Voting in Judicial Retention Elections
T HIS brief article reports the variations in the friends and neighbors effect when judicial retention elections for major trial courts are compared with judicial retention elections for appellate courts. Previous work on major trial court retention elections (Aspin and Hall 1987) reported that while voters in the home county of the judge were more likely to vote than were the voters in the rest of the district, there was no home county advantage…
The roll-off effect in judicial retention elections
Because of the absence of powerful traditional voting cues and the unusual nature and format of uncontested judicial retention elections, a large number of voters deliberately fail to cost ballots in retention elections. Filling a void in the study of retention elections, this study empirically examines the voter roll-off in 1,864 retention elections for major trial court judges for the period 1964–1984. The mean roll-off for these elections was …
Dyads, monads and national attributes
This article develops a dyadic model explaining participation with capability to demonstrate how recognizing and utilizing the logical ties between cases for analysis advances the explanation of state foreign policy behavior. While the direct use of attribute magnitudes in the dyad is unorthodox, when tested in two different data sets the model is found to be unquestionably superior to traditional uses of attributes
An alternative to the field theory interpretation of cooperative dyadic behavior
Of major concern herein is the possibility that the purported empirical suport for Model II of field theory is supirous. Model II focuses on only the variation in behavior within dyadic sets and is empirically supported when this behavior is some function of target magnitude. It is shown, however, that other linkage mechanicms also assume the variation in behavior within dyadic sets is a function of target magnitude. Thus, it is logically possibl…
Political Trust and Judicial Retention Elections
Retention elections are that part of the merit selection plan designed to hold judges accountable to the public. While more than one scholar has concluded that votes cast in a retention election are often not informed evaluations of the judge's qualifications and/or conduct on the bench, the few existing systematic empirical studies have failed to explain why people vote for or against retention. This study fills part of this void by testing the …
The Friends and Neighbors Effect in Judicial Retention Elections
HIS is a study of judicial retention elections for major trial court judges. Judicial retention elections differ from the more traditional partisan or nonpartisan elections in several respects. The absence of traditional voting cues including party labels, candidate appeals, incumbency, campaigns, and relatively fewer issues makes these plebiscites a most interesting topic for examination. One of the few traditional voting cues present in judicia…
The roll-off effect in judicial retention elections
Because of the absence of powerful traditional voting cues and the unusual nature and format of uncontested judicial retention elections, a large number of voters deliberately fail to cost ballots in retention elections. Filling a void in the study of retention elections, this study empirically examines the voter roll-off in 1,864 retention elections for major trial court judges for the period 1964–1984. The mean roll-off for these elections was …
The Friends and Neighbors Effect in Judicial Retention Elections
HIS is a study of judicial retention elections for major trial court judges. Judicial retention elections differ from the more traditional partisan or nonpartisan elections in several respects. The absence of traditional voting cues including party labels, candidate appeals, incumbency, campaigns, and relatively fewer issues makes these plebiscites a most interesting topic for examination. One of the few traditional voting cues present in judicia…
Thirty years of judicial retention elections
This article updates prior reports on the empirical patterns and trends in judicial retention elections. The 3,912 elections encompass both major trial court and appellate court elections in ten states for the period from 1964 through 1994. Reported trends include declines in the affirmative vote, rolloff, and voter differentiation among individual judges. Detailed analysis of defeated judges indicates that regular retention voters quickly remove…
Friends and Neighbors Voting in Judicial Retention Elections
T HIS brief article reports the variations in the friends and neighbors effect when judicial retention elections for major trial courts are compared with judicial retention elections for appellate courts. Previous work on major trial court retention elections (Aspin and Hall 1987) reported that while voters in the home county of the judge were more likely to vote than were the voters in the rest of the district, there was no home county advantage…
Political Trust and Judicial Retention Elections
Retention elections are that part of the merit selection plan designed to hold judges accountable to the public. While more than one scholar has concluded that votes cast in a retention election are often not informed evaluations of the judge's qualifications and/or conduct on the bench, the few existing systematic empirical studies have failed to explain why people vote for or against retention. This study fills part of this void by testing the …
An alternative to the field theory interpretation of cooperative dyadic behavior
Of major concern herein is the possibility that the purported empirical suport for Model II of field theory is supirous. Model II focuses on only the variation in behavior within dyadic sets and is empirically supported when this behavior is some function of target magnitude. It is shown, however, that other linkage mechanicms also assume the variation in behavior within dyadic sets is a function of target magnitude. Thus, it is logically possibl…
The roll-off effect in judicial retention elections
Because of the absence of powerful traditional voting cues and the unusual nature and format of uncontested judicial retention elections, a large number of voters deliberately fail to cost ballots in retention elections. Filling a void in the study of retention elections, this study empirically examines the voter roll-off in 1,864 retention elections for major trial court judges for the period 1964–1984. The mean roll-off for these elections was …
Dyads, monads and national attributes
This article develops a dyadic model explaining participation with capability to demonstrate how recognizing and utilizing the logical ties between cases for analysis advances the explanation of state foreign policy behavior. While the direct use of attribute magnitudes in the dyad is unorthodox, when tested in two different data sets the model is found to be unquestionably superior to traditional uses of attributes
An alternative to the field theory interpretation of cooperative dyadic behavior
Of major concern herein is the possibility that the purported empirical suport for Model II of field theory is supirous. Model II focuses on only the variation in behavior within dyadic sets and is empirically supported when this behavior is some function of target magnitude. It is shown, however, that other linkage mechanicms also assume the variation in behavior within dyadic sets is a function of target magnitude. Thus, it is logically possibl…
Political Trust and Judicial Retention Elections
Retention elections are that part of the merit selection plan designed to hold judges accountable to the public. While more than one scholar has concluded that votes cast in a retention election are often not informed evaluations of the judge's qualifications and/or conduct on the bench, the few existing systematic empirical studies have failed to explain why people vote for or against retention. This study fills part of this void by testing the …
The Friends and Neighbors Effect in Judicial Retention Elections
HIS is a study of judicial retention elections for major trial court judges. Judicial retention elections differ from the more traditional partisan or nonpartisan elections in several respects. The absence of traditional voting cues including party labels, candidate appeals, incumbency, campaigns, and relatively fewer issues makes these plebiscites a most interesting topic for examination. One of the few traditional voting cues present in judicia…
Friends and Neighbors Voting in Judicial Retention Elections
T HIS brief article reports the variations in the friends and neighbors effect when judicial retention elections for major trial courts are compared with judicial retention elections for appellate courts. Previous work on major trial court retention elections (Aspin and Hall 1987) reported that while voters in the home county of the judge were more likely to vote than were the voters in the rest of the district, there was no home county advantage…
Thirty years of judicial retention elections
This article updates prior reports on the empirical patterns and trends in judicial retention elections. The 3,912 elections encompass both major trial court and appellate court elections in ten states for the period from 1964 through 1994. Reported trends include declines in the affirmative vote, rolloff, and voter differentiation among individual judges. Detailed analysis of defeated judges indicates that regular retention voters quickly remove…
Law (6 obras) · Political science (6 obras) · Politics (6 obras) · Computer Science (5 obras) · Judicial and Constitutional Studies (5 obras) · Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems (5 obras) · Legal and Constitutional Studies (5 obras) · Voting (5 obras) · Law (4 obras) · Computer security (3 obras)