Ashwin J Rambaran
Biographic Data
| ID | 11057666 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Ashwin J Rambaran |
| GIVEN NAMES | Ashwin J |
| FAMILY NAME | Rambaran |
| SIGNATURE | RAMBARAN A J |
| AFFILIATIONS | University of Groningen |
| VERIFIED | No |
| TOTAL WORKS | 2 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 26 |
| WORKS AS AUTHOR | 2 |
| WORKS AS EDITOR | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2013 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2013 |
| H-INDEX | 2 |
Social Goals and Adolescent Friendships
This study examined adolescent friendship selection and social influence with regard to agentic (status and power) and communal (closeness and affiliation) goals at three waves during middle school ( N = 504; 12–14 years; 53% boys). Meta‐level findings across four friendship networks indicated social influence for both goal orientations: friends grew more similar to each other in agentic as well as communal goals. Moreover, in one friendship netw…
Status‐Based Influence Processes
This study examined whether classroom norms based on status explained between‐class variations in selection processes and particularly influence processes on adolescents’ risk attitudes in a sample of 1092 adolescents (age 12–13) across 47 classrooms. Based on the association between status (popularity) and risk attitudes ( norm salience ), it was hypothesized that risk attitudes would proliferate more via peer influence processes in classes with…
Status‐Based Influence Processes
This study examined whether classroom norms based on status explained between‐class variations in selection processes and particularly influence processes on adolescents’ risk attitudes in a sample of 1092 adolescents (age 12–13) across 47 classrooms. Based on the association between status (popularity) and risk attitudes ( norm salience ), it was hypothesized that risk attitudes would proliferate more via peer influence processes in classes with…
Social Goals and Adolescent Friendships
This study examined adolescent friendship selection and social influence with regard to agentic (status and power) and communal (closeness and affiliation) goals at three waves during middle school ( N = 504; 12–14 years; 53% boys). Meta‐level findings across four friendship networks indicated social influence for both goal orientations: friends grew more similar to each other in agentic as well as communal goals. Moreover, in one friendship netw…
Social Goals and Adolescent Friendships
This study examined adolescent friendship selection and social influence with regard to agentic (status and power) and communal (closeness and affiliation) goals at three waves during middle school ( N = 504; 12–14 years; 53% boys). Meta‐level findings across four friendship networks indicated social influence for both goal orientations: friends grew more similar to each other in agentic as well as communal goals. Moreover, in one friendship netw…
Status‐Based Influence Processes
This study examined whether classroom norms based on status explained between‐class variations in selection processes and particularly influence processes on adolescents’ risk attitudes in a sample of 1092 adolescents (age 12–13) across 47 classrooms. Based on the association between status (popularity) and risk attitudes ( norm salience ), it was hypothesized that risk attitudes would proliferate more via peer influence processes in classes with…
Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression (2 works) · Developmental psychology (2 works) · Friendship (2 works) · Psychology (2 works) · Social Psychology (2 works) · Social Psychology (2 works) · Affect (linguistics (1 work) · Association (psychology (1 work) · Attachment and Relationship Dynamics (1 work) · Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (1 work)