Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Adam D Booth

Biographic Data

ID11061518
NAMEAdam D Booth
GIVEN NAMESAdam D
FAMILY NAMEBooth
SIGNATUREBOOTH A D
AFFILIATIONSDepartment of Earth Science and Engineering, Imperial College London South Kensington Campus London SW7 2AZ UK
VERIFIEDNo
TOTAL WORKS3
TOTAL CITATIONS8
AUTHOR COUNT3
EDITOR COUNT0
FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR2008
LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR2014
H-INDEX1
  • Structure of an Ancient Egyptian Tomb Inferred from Ground‐Penetrating Radar Imaging of Deflected Overburden Horizons

    Open Access•Adam Booth, Adam D Booth et al.•ARTICLE•Archaeological Prospection•2014•Cited by: 1•References: 5

    Geophysical data acquisitions in most archaeological campaigns aim to image the target structure directly. The presence of a target, however, may be inferred from its interaction with surrounding layers, if its relationship with those layers can be characterized sufficiently. In this paper, we show the use of ground‐penetrating radar (GPR) to detect the subsurface continuation of the Ancient Egyptian tomb of the high‐official Karakhamun (Theban T…

  • Multi‐offset ground penetrating radar methods to image buried foundations of a medieval town wall, Great Yarmouth, UK

    Open Access•Adam Booth, Adam D Booth et al.•ARTICLE•Archaeological Prospection•2010•Cited by: 1•References: 3

    In conventional common‐offset (CO) usage, ground‐penetrating radar (GPR) methods may be problematic where a target is hosted within a structurally complex subsurface, or where coherent noise energy obscures the response to that target. This often occurs when imaging archaeology in urban environments, where reflected and diffracted air‐wave energy can be pervasive in the presence of cars, walls and other nearby features. To overcome such issues we…

  • Three‐dimensional, multi‐offset ground‐penetrating radar imaging of archaeological targets

    Open Access•Adam Booth, Adam D Booth et al.•ARTICLE•Archaeological Prospection•2008•Cited by: 6•References: 4

    The efficacy of ground penetrating radar (GPR) methods is inhibited when surveying over a target that is structurally complex and/or hosted within attenuative media. Recent research has documented the ability of certain seismic methods to improve imaging using GPR. For imaging complex targets, three‐dimensional acquisition and migration methods are applied. For attenuative sites, signal‐to‐ noise ratio (SNR) may be boosted on acquisition of multi…

  • Three‐dimensional, multi‐offset ground‐penetrating radar imaging of archaeological targets

    Open Access•Adam Booth, Adam D Booth et al.•ARTICLE•Archaeological Prospection•2008•Cited by: 6•References: 4

    The efficacy of ground penetrating radar (GPR) methods is inhibited when surveying over a target that is structurally complex and/or hosted within attenuative media. Recent research has documented the ability of certain seismic methods to improve imaging using GPR. For imaging complex targets, three‐dimensional acquisition and migration methods are applied. For attenuative sites, signal‐to‐ noise ratio (SNR) may be boosted on acquisition of multi…

  • Structure of an Ancient Egyptian Tomb Inferred from Ground‐Penetrating Radar Imaging of Deflected Overburden Horizons

    Open Access•Adam Booth, Adam D Booth et al.•ARTICLE•Archaeological Prospection•2014•Cited by: 1•References: 5

    Geophysical data acquisitions in most archaeological campaigns aim to image the target structure directly. The presence of a target, however, may be inferred from its interaction with surrounding layers, if its relationship with those layers can be characterized sufficiently. In this paper, we show the use of ground‐penetrating radar (GPR) to detect the subsurface continuation of the Ancient Egyptian tomb of the high‐official Karakhamun (Theban T…

  • Multi‐offset ground penetrating radar methods to image buried foundations of a medieval town wall, Great Yarmouth, UK

    Open Access•Adam Booth, Adam D Booth et al.•ARTICLE•Archaeological Prospection•2010•Cited by: 1•References: 3

    In conventional common‐offset (CO) usage, ground‐penetrating radar (GPR) methods may be problematic where a target is hosted within a structurally complex subsurface, or where coherent noise energy obscures the response to that target. This often occurs when imaging archaeology in urban environments, where reflected and diffracted air‐wave energy can be pervasive in the presence of cars, walls and other nearby features. To overcome such issues we…

  • Three‐dimensional, multi‐offset ground‐penetrating radar imaging of archaeological targets

    Open Access•Adam Booth, Adam D Booth et al.•ARTICLE•Archaeological Prospection•2008•Cited by: 6•References: 4

    The efficacy of ground penetrating radar (GPR) methods is inhibited when surveying over a target that is structurally complex and/or hosted within attenuative media. Recent research has documented the ability of certain seismic methods to improve imaging using GPR. For imaging complex targets, three‐dimensional acquisition and migration methods are applied. For attenuative sites, signal‐to‐ noise ratio (SNR) may be boosted on acquisition of multi…

  • Multi‐offset ground penetrating radar methods to image buried foundations of a medieval town wall, Great Yarmouth, UK

    Open Access•Adam Booth, Adam D Booth et al.•ARTICLE•Archaeological Prospection•2010•Cited by: 1•References: 3

    In conventional common‐offset (CO) usage, ground‐penetrating radar (GPR) methods may be problematic where a target is hosted within a structurally complex subsurface, or where coherent noise energy obscures the response to that target. This often occurs when imaging archaeology in urban environments, where reflected and diffracted air‐wave energy can be pervasive in the presence of cars, walls and other nearby features. To overcome such issues we…

  • Structure of an Ancient Egyptian Tomb Inferred from Ground‐Penetrating Radar Imaging of Deflected Overburden Horizons

    Open Access•Adam Booth, Adam D Booth et al.•ARTICLE•Archaeological Prospection•2014•Cited by: 1•References: 5

    Geophysical data acquisitions in most archaeological campaigns aim to image the target structure directly. The presence of a target, however, may be inferred from its interaction with surrounding layers, if its relationship with those layers can be characterized sufficiently. In this paper, we show the use of ground‐penetrating radar (GPR) to detect the subsurface continuation of the Ancient Egyptian tomb of the high‐official Karakhamun (Theban T…

Geology (3 works) · Geophysical Methods and Applications (3 works) · Ground-Penetrating Radar (3 works) · Radar (3 works) · Seismic Waves and Analysis (3 works) · Computer Science (2 works) · Offset (computer science (2 works) · Remote sensing (2 works) · Seismic Imaging and Inversion Techniques (2 works) · Seismology (2 works)

Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae