Carlo Alvaro
Biographic Data
| ID | 1109786 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Carlo Alvaro |
| GIVEN NAMES | Carlo |
| FAMILY NAME | Alvaro |
| SIGNATURE | ALVARO C |
| AFFILIATIONS | New York City College of Technology |
| ORCID | 0000-0003-3714-2937 |
| VERIFIED | Yes |
| TOTAL WORKS | 9 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 10 |
| AUTHOR COUNT | 9 |
| EDITOR COUNT | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2017 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2023 |
| H-INDEX | 2 |
Ethical Subjectivism
Individual relativism, also known as ethical subjectivism, is an attractive theory about morality. It argues that morality is a matter relative to the individual in a way akin to personal taste. For example, subjectivists regard the ethical judgment ‘Stealing is wrong’ as comparable with the judgment of taste ‘I dislike Brussels sprouts’. Yet, subjectivism is not nihilism. While nihilism denies the existence of moral value, duties, principles and…
The "Heaven Ab Initio" Argument from Evil
Logical and evidential arguments from evil are generally thought to have been rebutted by various refutations, defenses, and theodicies. While disparate, these responses employ similar strategies to show that God has morally sufficient reasons to permit evil and suffering in the world, either to preserve human freedom, for the sake of the moral growth of human souls, or to train humans to be able to act freely without sinning once in heaven. In t…
The Incoherence of an Evil God
The evil god challenge is for theists to explain why a good god's existence should be considerably more reasonable than an evil god's existence. Challengers note that there is a symmetry between a good god and an evil god. Moreover, the classical arguments for a good god can prove the existence of an evil god just as well. Furthermore, theodicies can be mirrored by reverse theodicies. Consequently, the evil god challenge leads to two implications…
Vegan parents and children
Marcus William Hunt argues that when co-parents disagree over whether to raise their child (or children) as a vegan, they should reach a compromise as a gift given by one parent to the other out of respect for his or her authority. Josh Millburn contends that Hunt’s proposal of parental compromise over veganism is unacceptable on the ground that it overlooks respect for animal rights, which bars compromising. However, he contemplates the possibil…
Lab-Grown Meat and Veganism
Is Animal Suffering Really All That Matters? The Move from Suffering to Vegetarianism
Veganism and Children
Ethical Veganism, Virtue Ethics, and the Great Soul
Ethical Veganism, Virtue, and Greatness of the Soul
Ethical Veganism, Virtue, and Greatness of the Soul
Lab-Grown Meat and Veganism
Veganism and Children
The Incoherence of an Evil God
The evil god challenge is for theists to explain why a good god's existence should be considerably more reasonable than an evil god's existence. Challengers note that there is a symmetry between a good god and an evil god. Moreover, the classical arguments for a good god can prove the existence of an evil god just as well. Furthermore, theodicies can be mirrored by reverse theodicies. Consequently, the evil god challenge leads to two implications…
Ethical Veganism, Virtue, and Greatness of the Soul
Lab-Grown Meat and Veganism
Is Animal Suffering Really All That Matters? The Move from Suffering to Vegetarianism
Veganism and Children
Ethical Veganism, Virtue Ethics, and the Great Soul
Vegan parents and children
Marcus William Hunt argues that when co-parents disagree over whether to raise their child (or children) as a vegan, they should reach a compromise as a gift given by one parent to the other out of respect for his or her authority. Josh Millburn contends that Hunt’s proposal of parental compromise over veganism is unacceptable on the ground that it overlooks respect for animal rights, which bars compromising. However, he contemplates the possibil…
The Incoherence of an Evil God
The evil god challenge is for theists to explain why a good god's existence should be considerably more reasonable than an evil god's existence. Challengers note that there is a symmetry between a good god and an evil god. Moreover, the classical arguments for a good god can prove the existence of an evil god just as well. Furthermore, theodicies can be mirrored by reverse theodicies. Consequently, the evil god challenge leads to two implications…
Ethical Subjectivism
Individual relativism, also known as ethical subjectivism, is an attractive theory about morality. It argues that morality is a matter relative to the individual in a way akin to personal taste. For example, subjectivists regard the ethical judgment ‘Stealing is wrong’ as comparable with the judgment of taste ‘I dislike Brussels sprouts’. Yet, subjectivism is not nihilism. While nihilism denies the existence of moral value, duties, principles and…
The "Heaven Ab Initio" Argument from Evil
Logical and evidential arguments from evil are generally thought to have been rebutted by various refutations, defenses, and theodicies. While disparate, these responses employ similar strategies to show that God has morally sufficient reasons to permit evil and suffering in the world, either to preserve human freedom, for the sake of the moral growth of human souls, or to train humans to be able to act freely without sinning once in heaven. In t…
Philosophy (8 works) · Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact (5 works) · Environmental ethics (5 works) · Epistemology (5 works) · Philosophy (5 works) · Animal rights (4 works) · Law (4 works) · Law (4 works) · Political science (4 works) · Psychology (4 works)