Deborah K W Modrak

Biographic Data

ID1113928
NAMEDeborah K W Modrak
GIVEN NAMESDeborah K W
FAMILY NAMEModrak
SIGNATUREMODRAK D K W
VERIFIEDNo
TOTAL WORKS11
TOTAL CITATIONS0
WORKS AS AUTHOR11
WORKS AS EDITOR0
FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR1979
LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR2008
H-INDEX0

  • Desires and Faculties in Plato and Aristotle

    Deborah K W Modrak, Deborah Modrak et al.ARTICLEPhilosophical Inquiry2008

  • Aristotle on Gender, Class and Political Hierarchies

    Deborah K W Modrak, Deborah Modrak et al.ARTICLEPhilosophical Inquiry2006

  • Aristotle's Theory of Language and Meaning

    Richard Tierney, Deborah K W Modrak et al.ARTICLEThe Journal of Philosophy2002

  • Aristotle's Theory of Language and Meaning

    Open AccessDeborah K W Modrak, Deborah ModrakBOOKAristotle's Theory of Language…2000

    This is a book about Aristotle's philosophy of language, interpreted in a framework that provides a comprehensive interpretation of Aristotle's metaphysics, philosophy of mind, epistemology and science. The aim of the book is to explicate the description of meaning contained in De Interpretatione and to show the relevance of that theory of meaning to much of the rest of Aristotle's philosophy. In the process Deborah Modrak reveals how that theory…

  • Aristotle's Theory of Language and Meaning

    Deborah K W ModrakBOOKAristotle's Theory of Language…2000

  • Animal Minds and Human Morals

    Deborah K W ModrakARTICLEIsis1996

  • Theophrastus and Recent Scholarship

    Deborah K W Modrak, Deborah Modrak et al.ARTICLEJournal of the History of Ideas1994

  • Aristotle

    Tim Maudlin, Deborah K W Modrak et al.ARTICLEThe Philosophical Review1990

  • Aristotle

    Christopher Shields, Deborah K W Modrak et al.ARTICLEThe Classical World1988

  • Aristotle

    D S Hutchinson, Damien Hutchinson et al.ARTICLEPhoenix1988

  • Forms, Types, and Tokens in Aristotle's Metaphysics

    Deborah K W Modrak, Deborah ModrakARTICLEJournal of the history of…1979

    ARE ARISTOTELIAN FORMS universals or par t iculars? This ques t ion has received much a t ten t ion in recent discussions. ~ Besides being interes t ing in its own right, the answer is crucial to the in terpre ta t ion of the central books of the Metaphysics, given the interrelatedness of Aris tot le 's not ions of form, subs tance , essence, and definition. If, for example, the correct answer is that forms are universals , Aristotle may be in di…