Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Silvia Tomášková

Biographic Data

ID111940
NAMESilvia Tomášková
GIVEN NAMESSilvia
FAMILY NAMETomášková
SIGNATURETOMÁŠKOVÁ S
AFFILIATIONSUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
ORCID0000-0002-7766-1910
VERIFIEDYes
TOTAL WORKS11
TOTAL CITATIONS54
AUTHOR COUNT11
EDITOR COUNT0
FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR1997
LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR2020
H-INDEX4
  • Prehistoric Art as a Boundary Object

    Open Access•Silvia Tomášková•ARTICLE•Journal of Archaeological Method…•2020•Cited by: 2•References: 23

  • Feminist mapping for archaeologists

    Silvia Tomášková•CHAPTER•Re-Mapping Archaeology•2018

    I frame this chapter through a close historical and anthropological reading of two terms - “feminist” and “mapping” - in the context of archaeology. How do we understand the relationship between gender and feminist archaeology, three decades after the initial popularization of gender archaeology, particularly in the Anglo-American context? What might mapping in archaeological projects entail today, specifically in terms of technologies, bodies, a…

  • Digital technologies in context

    Open Access•Silvia Tomášková•ARTICLE•Digital Applications in…•2015•Cited by: 3•References: 13

  • Landscape for a good feminist. An archaeological review

    Open Access•Silvia Tomášková•ARTICLE•Archaeological Dialogues•2011•Cited by: 8•References: 15

    In 1998 this journal ( Archaeological dialogues 5(2)) published an editorial titled ‘What is wrong with gender archaeology?’. Responding to this rhetorical question, the editor affirmed that indeed nothing was wrong with it; to the contrary, gender archaeology was as healthy as could be, ‘one of the most thriving fields within the discipline’ ( Archaeological dialogues 1998, 88). Nonetheless, the writer then proceeded to describe a pervasive, ong…

  • Picture me dead. Moral choices reimagined

    Open Access•Silvia Tomášková•ARTICLE•Archaeological Dialogues•2010

    Shortly before her death, my grandmother expressed a strongly felt sentiment not to lie in the family tomb next to her sister-in-law. It was not quite clear what was to be done with the bones of the woman who by then had occupied the space next to her brother, my grandfather, for some five years. My mother resolved the issue by depositing the urn with my grandmother's ashes on the other side of my grandfather's coffin, stating matter-of-factly, '…

  • Mapping a Future

    Open Access•Silvia Tomášková•ARTICLE•Journal of Archaeological Method…•2007•Cited by: 17•References: 59

  • On being heard. Theory as an archaeological practice

    Open Access•Silvia Tomášková•ARTICLE•Archaeological Dialogues•2006

    Suggesting that archaeological theory both exists and does not at the same time is a wise move, so long as it opens the possibility for a range of answers and dialogue. In that respect I find myself in an agreement with Johnson, given that he takes up a piece of the theoretical minefield, and leaves plenty for others to engage with. Rather than debate his argument per se, therefore, I will endeavour to enlarge his essay in ways that will both con…

  • Next stop

    Open Access•Silvia Tomášková•ARTICLE•Archaeological Dialogues•2006•Cited by: 1

    As a Palaeolithic archaeologist I am often surprised by the paucity of research on issues of social relations in more recent time periods. The wealth of archaeological evidence and written texts seems so plentiful from where I stand. Thus when I look into Greek and Roman archaeology for examples of research on gendered being and for a discussion of difference in the past I am reminded that archaeological evidence is the consequence of research qu…

  • What is a Burin? Typology, Technology, and Interregional Comparison

    Open Access•Silvia Tomášková•ARTICLE•Journal of Archaeological Method…•2005•Cited by: 10•References: 79

  • Nationalism, Local Histories and the Making of Data in Archaeology

    Open Access•Silvia Tomášková•ARTICLE•Journal of the Royal Anthropologica…•2003•Cited by: 13•References: 35

    The last twenty years have witnessed animated debates in archaeology about the influence of context on the production of archaeological knowledge. This article argues that social and historical context affects archaeology not only at the level of interpretation but also at that of basic practice. I illustrate this claim about the historical nature of data through a comparison of two Palaeolithic central European sites, Willendorf and Dolní Věston…

  • Vanity Yes, Pernicious Maybe

    Open Access•Silvia Tomášková, P Redfield•ARTICLE•Anthropology News•1997

  • Mapping a Future

    Open Access•Silvia Tomášková•ARTICLE•Journal of Archaeological Method…•2007•Cited by: 17•References: 59

  • Nationalism, Local Histories and the Making of Data in Archaeology

    Open Access•Silvia Tomášková•ARTICLE•Journal of the Royal Anthropologica…•2003•Cited by: 13•References: 35

    The last twenty years have witnessed animated debates in archaeology about the influence of context on the production of archaeological knowledge. This article argues that social and historical context affects archaeology not only at the level of interpretation but also at that of basic practice. I illustrate this claim about the historical nature of data through a comparison of two Palaeolithic central European sites, Willendorf and Dolní Věston…

  • What is a Burin? Typology, Technology, and Interregional Comparison

    Open Access•Silvia Tomášková•ARTICLE•Journal of Archaeological Method…•2005•Cited by: 10•References: 79

  • Landscape for a good feminist. An archaeological review

    Open Access•Silvia Tomášková•ARTICLE•Archaeological Dialogues•2011•Cited by: 8•References: 15

    In 1998 this journal ( Archaeological dialogues 5(2)) published an editorial titled ‘What is wrong with gender archaeology?’. Responding to this rhetorical question, the editor affirmed that indeed nothing was wrong with it; to the contrary, gender archaeology was as healthy as could be, ‘one of the most thriving fields within the discipline’ ( Archaeological dialogues 1998, 88). Nonetheless, the writer then proceeded to describe a pervasive, ong…

  • Digital technologies in context

    Open Access•Silvia Tomášková•ARTICLE•Digital Applications in…•2015•Cited by: 3•References: 13

  • Prehistoric Art as a Boundary Object

    Open Access•Silvia Tomášková•ARTICLE•Journal of Archaeological Method…•2020•Cited by: 2•References: 23

  • Next stop

    Open Access•Silvia Tomášková•ARTICLE•Archaeological Dialogues•2006•Cited by: 1

    As a Palaeolithic archaeologist I am often surprised by the paucity of research on issues of social relations in more recent time periods. The wealth of archaeological evidence and written texts seems so plentiful from where I stand. Thus when I look into Greek and Roman archaeology for examples of research on gendered being and for a discussion of difference in the past I am reminded that archaeological evidence is the consequence of research qu…

  • Vanity Yes, Pernicious Maybe

    Open Access•Silvia Tomášková, P Redfield•ARTICLE•Anthropology News•1997

  • Nationalism, Local Histories and the Making of Data in Archaeology

    Open Access•Silvia Tomášková•ARTICLE•Journal of the Royal Anthropologica…•2003•Cited by: 13•References: 35

    The last twenty years have witnessed animated debates in archaeology about the influence of context on the production of archaeological knowledge. This article argues that social and historical context affects archaeology not only at the level of interpretation but also at that of basic practice. I illustrate this claim about the historical nature of data through a comparison of two Palaeolithic central European sites, Willendorf and Dolní Věston…

  • What is a Burin? Typology, Technology, and Interregional Comparison

    Open Access•Silvia Tomášková•ARTICLE•Journal of Archaeological Method…•2005•Cited by: 10•References: 79

  • On being heard. Theory as an archaeological practice

    Open Access•Silvia Tomášková•ARTICLE•Archaeological Dialogues•2006

    Suggesting that archaeological theory both exists and does not at the same time is a wise move, so long as it opens the possibility for a range of answers and dialogue. In that respect I find myself in an agreement with Johnson, given that he takes up a piece of the theoretical minefield, and leaves plenty for others to engage with. Rather than debate his argument per se, therefore, I will endeavour to enlarge his essay in ways that will both con…

  • Next stop

    Open Access•Silvia Tomášková•ARTICLE•Archaeological Dialogues•2006•Cited by: 1

    As a Palaeolithic archaeologist I am often surprised by the paucity of research on issues of social relations in more recent time periods. The wealth of archaeological evidence and written texts seems so plentiful from where I stand. Thus when I look into Greek and Roman archaeology for examples of research on gendered being and for a discussion of difference in the past I am reminded that archaeological evidence is the consequence of research qu…

  • Mapping a Future

    Open Access•Silvia Tomášková•ARTICLE•Journal of Archaeological Method…•2007•Cited by: 17•References: 59

  • Picture me dead. Moral choices reimagined

    Open Access•Silvia Tomášková•ARTICLE•Archaeological Dialogues•2010

    Shortly before her death, my grandmother expressed a strongly felt sentiment not to lie in the family tomb next to her sister-in-law. It was not quite clear what was to be done with the bones of the woman who by then had occupied the space next to her brother, my grandfather, for some five years. My mother resolved the issue by depositing the urn with my grandmother's ashes on the other side of my grandfather's coffin, stating matter-of-factly, '…

  • Landscape for a good feminist. An archaeological review

    Open Access•Silvia Tomášková•ARTICLE•Archaeological Dialogues•2011•Cited by: 8•References: 15

    In 1998 this journal ( Archaeological dialogues 5(2)) published an editorial titled ‘What is wrong with gender archaeology?’. Responding to this rhetorical question, the editor affirmed that indeed nothing was wrong with it; to the contrary, gender archaeology was as healthy as could be, ‘one of the most thriving fields within the discipline’ ( Archaeological dialogues 1998, 88). Nonetheless, the writer then proceeded to describe a pervasive, ong…

  • Digital technologies in context

    Open Access•Silvia Tomášková•ARTICLE•Digital Applications in…•2015•Cited by: 3•References: 13

  • Feminist mapping for archaeologists

    Silvia Tomášková•CHAPTER•Re-Mapping Archaeology•2018

    I frame this chapter through a close historical and anthropological reading of two terms - “feminist” and “mapping” - in the context of archaeology. How do we understand the relationship between gender and feminist archaeology, three decades after the initial popularization of gender archaeology, particularly in the Anglo-American context? What might mapping in archaeological projects entail today, specifically in terms of technologies, bodies, a…

  • Prehistoric Art as a Boundary Object

    Open Access•Silvia Tomášková•ARTICLE•Journal of Archaeological Method…•2020•Cited by: 2•References: 23

Archaeology (9 works) · History (9 works) · Archaeology and ancient environmental studies (6 works) · Philosophy (6 works) · Sociology (6 works) · Historical and Cultural Archaeology Studies (5 works) · History (5 works) · Anthropology (4 works) · Archaeology and Rock Art Studies (4 works) · Art (4 works)

Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae