Frederic N Cleaveland

Biographic Data

ID1129083
NAMEFrederic N Cleaveland
GIVEN NAMESFrederic N
FAMILY NAMECleaveland
SIGNATURECLEAVELAND F N
AFFILIATIONSUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
VERIFIEDNo
TOTAL WORKS11
TOTAL CITATIONS0
WORKS AS AUTHOR11
WORKS AS EDITOR0
FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR1953
LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR1986
H-INDEX0

  • James W. Prothro

    Frederic N Cleaveland, Pamela Johnston Conover et al.ARTICLEPS Political Science & Politics1986

    An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. As you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button

  • Reply to a Critique

    Richard L Chapman, Frederic N CleavelandARTICLEPublic Administration Review1975

  • The Changing Character of the Public Service and the Administrator of the 1980's

    Richard L Chapman, Frederic N CleavelandARTICLEPublic Administration Review1973

  • More Urban Anthologies

    Oliver P Williams, Oliver Williams et al.ARTICLEPublic Administration Review1972

  • Congress and Urban Problems

    Frederic N CleavelandARTICLEThe Journal of Politics1966

  • Professional Conferences

    Open AccessJohn Herling, Labor Letter et al.ARTICLEAmerican Political Science Review1965

    An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. As you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button

  • Science and State Government

    Christian L Larsen, Christian Larsen et al.ARTICLEThe Western Political Quarterly1961

  • Governing New York City

    Frederic N CleavelandARTICLEThe Journal of Politics1961

  • Science, Society, and Government

    W V Hurley, Simon Marcson et al.ARTICLEPublic Administration Review1961

  • Ideal and Practice in Public Administration. Emmette S. Redford

    Frederic N CleavelandARTICLEThe Journal of Politics1959

  • Administrative Decentralization in the U. S. Bureau of Reclamation

    Frederic N CleavelandARTICLEPublic Administration Review1953

    tration in federal departments and agencies. Whether this trend came because of or in spite of the party in power is not the concern of this article. Its purpose is to consider briefly how one agency, the Bureau of Reclamation, moved during this period from a highly centralized to a decentralized and regionalized organization, and then to analyze and discuss some of its experiences with administrative decentralization