Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Daniel Vanderveken

Biographic Data

ID1129532
NAMEDaniel Vanderveken
GIVEN NAMESDaniel
FAMILY NAMEVanderveken
SIGNATUREVANDERVEKEN D
AFFILIATIONSUniversité du Québec à Trois-Rivières
VERIFIEDNo
TOTAL WORKS10
TOTAL CITATIONS11
AUTHOR COUNT8
EDITOR COUNT2
FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR1985
LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR2013
H-INDEX1
  • Towards a Formal Pragmatics of Discourse

    Daniel Vanderveken•ARTICLE•International Review of Pragmatics•2013•Cited by: 1

    Could we enrich speech-act theory to deal with discourse? Wittgenstein and Searle pointed out difficulties. Most conversations lack a conversational purpose, they require collective intentionality, their background is indefinitely open, irrelevant and infelicitous utterances do not prevent conversations to continue, etc. Like Wittgenstein and Searle I am sceptic about the possibility of a general theory of all kinds of language-games. In my view,…

  • Aspects cognitifs en logique intensionnelle et théorie de la vérité

    Open Access•Daniel Vanderveken•ARTICLE•Dialogue•2009

    Dans l’optique de la recherche d’un critère plus fin d’identité propositionnelle pour une analyse adéquate du sens et de la pensée, je propose une révision de l’ontologie de la théorie des types de sens et de dénotations de Frege et Church, et je formule une logique naturelle prédicative des propositions qui explique leur forme logique en termes d’actes de prédication. Je définis en outre la notion plus subjective de vérité selon un agent ainsi q…

  • Logic, Thought and Action

    Open Access•Daniel Vanderveken•BOOK•Logic, Thought and Action (Logic,…•2005

  • Logic, Thought and Action (Logic, Epistemology, and the Unity of Science)

    Daniel Vanderveken•BOOK•Logic, Thought and Action (Logic,…•2005

    This second volume in the series Logic, Epistemology, and the Unity of Science brings a pragmatic perspective to the discussion of the unity of science. Contemporary philosophy and cognitive science increasingly acknowledge the systematic interrelation of language, thought and action. The principal function of language is to enable speakers to communicate their intentions to others, to respond flexibly in a social context and to act cooperatively…

  • Chapter 2. Universal Grammar and Speech Act Theory

    Daniel Vanderveken•CHAPTER•Pragmatics & Beyond New Series•2002

  • Essays in Speech Act Theory

    Daniel Vanderveken, Susumu Kubo•BOOK•Essays in speech act theory•2001•Cited by: 10

    1. Chapter 1. Introduction (by Vanderveken, Daniel) 2. Part I. General Theory 3. Chapter 2. Universal Grammar and Speech Act Theory (by Vanderveken, Daniel) 4. Chapter 3. Verbal Mood and Sentence Moods in the Tradition of Universal Grammar (by Leclerc, Andre) 5. Chapter 4. How Performatives Work (by Searle, John R.) 6. Chapter 5. Possible Directions of Fit between Mind, Language and the World (by Sousa Melo, Candida J. de) 7. Part II. Discourse a…

  • On the ramification of the fundamental notions of meaning, analyticity, consistency, entailment and commitment to speech acts in formal semantics

    Open Access•Daniel Vanderveken•ARTICLE•Journal of Pragmatics•1995•References: 1

  • What is an illocutionary force?

    Daniel Vanderveken•CHAPTER•Dialogue - an Interdisciplinary…•1985

  • Speech Acts and Illocutionary Logic

    Open Access•John R Searle, Daniel Vanderveken•CHAPTER•Logic, Thought and Action (Logic,…•1985

  • Foundations of Illocutionary Logic

    John R Searle, Daniel Vanderveken•BOOK•Foundations of illocutionary logic•1985

    This is a formal and systematic study of the logical foundations of speech act theory. The study of speech acts has been a flourishing branch of the philosophy of language and linguistics over the last two decades, and John Searle has of course himself made some of the most notable contributions to that study in the sequence of books Speech Acts (1969), Expression and Meaning (1979) and Intentionality (1983). In collaboration with Daniel Vanderve…

  • Essays in Speech Act Theory

    Daniel Vanderveken, Susumu Kubo•BOOK•Essays in speech act theory•2001•Cited by: 10

    1. Chapter 1. Introduction (by Vanderveken, Daniel) 2. Part I. General Theory 3. Chapter 2. Universal Grammar and Speech Act Theory (by Vanderveken, Daniel) 4. Chapter 3. Verbal Mood and Sentence Moods in the Tradition of Universal Grammar (by Leclerc, Andre) 5. Chapter 4. How Performatives Work (by Searle, John R.) 6. Chapter 5. Possible Directions of Fit between Mind, Language and the World (by Sousa Melo, Candida J. de) 7. Part II. Discourse a…

  • Towards a Formal Pragmatics of Discourse

    Daniel Vanderveken•ARTICLE•International Review of Pragmatics•2013•Cited by: 1

    Could we enrich speech-act theory to deal with discourse? Wittgenstein and Searle pointed out difficulties. Most conversations lack a conversational purpose, they require collective intentionality, their background is indefinitely open, irrelevant and infelicitous utterances do not prevent conversations to continue, etc. Like Wittgenstein and Searle I am sceptic about the possibility of a general theory of all kinds of language-games. In my view,…

  • What is an illocutionary force?

    Daniel Vanderveken•CHAPTER•Dialogue - an Interdisciplinary…•1985

  • Speech Acts and Illocutionary Logic

    Open Access•John R Searle, Daniel Vanderveken•CHAPTER•Logic, Thought and Action (Logic,…•1985

  • Foundations of Illocutionary Logic

    John R Searle, Daniel Vanderveken•BOOK•Foundations of illocutionary logic•1985

    This is a formal and systematic study of the logical foundations of speech act theory. The study of speech acts has been a flourishing branch of the philosophy of language and linguistics over the last two decades, and John Searle has of course himself made some of the most notable contributions to that study in the sequence of books Speech Acts (1969), Expression and Meaning (1979) and Intentionality (1983). In collaboration with Daniel Vanderve…

  • On the ramification of the fundamental notions of meaning, analyticity, consistency, entailment and commitment to speech acts in formal semantics

    Open Access•Daniel Vanderveken•ARTICLE•Journal of Pragmatics•1995•References: 1

  • Essays in Speech Act Theory

    Daniel Vanderveken, Susumu Kubo•BOOK•Essays in speech act theory•2001•Cited by: 10

    1. Chapter 1. Introduction (by Vanderveken, Daniel) 2. Part I. General Theory 3. Chapter 2. Universal Grammar and Speech Act Theory (by Vanderveken, Daniel) 4. Chapter 3. Verbal Mood and Sentence Moods in the Tradition of Universal Grammar (by Leclerc, Andre) 5. Chapter 4. How Performatives Work (by Searle, John R.) 6. Chapter 5. Possible Directions of Fit between Mind, Language and the World (by Sousa Melo, Candida J. de) 7. Part II. Discourse a…

  • Chapter 2. Universal Grammar and Speech Act Theory

    Daniel Vanderveken•CHAPTER•Pragmatics & Beyond New Series•2002

  • Logic, Thought and Action

    Open Access•Daniel Vanderveken•BOOK•Logic, Thought and Action (Logic,…•2005

  • Logic, Thought and Action (Logic, Epistemology, and the Unity of Science)

    Daniel Vanderveken•BOOK•Logic, Thought and Action (Logic,…•2005

    This second volume in the series Logic, Epistemology, and the Unity of Science brings a pragmatic perspective to the discussion of the unity of science. Contemporary philosophy and cognitive science increasingly acknowledge the systematic interrelation of language, thought and action. The principal function of language is to enable speakers to communicate their intentions to others, to respond flexibly in a social context and to act cooperatively…

  • Aspects cognitifs en logique intensionnelle et théorie de la vérité

    Open Access•Daniel Vanderveken•ARTICLE•Dialogue•2009

    Dans l’optique de la recherche d’un critère plus fin d’identité propositionnelle pour une analyse adéquate du sens et de la pensée, je propose une révision de l’ontologie de la théorie des types de sens et de dénotations de Frege et Church, et je formule une logique naturelle prédicative des propositions qui explique leur forme logique en termes d’actes de prédication. Je définis en outre la notion plus subjective de vérité selon un agent ainsi q…

  • Towards a Formal Pragmatics of Discourse

    Daniel Vanderveken•ARTICLE•International Review of Pragmatics•2013•Cited by: 1

    Could we enrich speech-act theory to deal with discourse? Wittgenstein and Searle pointed out difficulties. Most conversations lack a conversational purpose, they require collective intentionality, their background is indefinitely open, irrelevant and infelicitous utterances do not prevent conversations to continue, etc. Like Wittgenstein and Searle I am sceptic about the possibility of a general theory of all kinds of language-games. In my view,…

Computer Science (5 works) · Philosophy (5 works) · Psychology (4 works) · Speech act (4 works) · Epistemology (3 works) · Indirect speech (3 works) · Linguistics (3 works) · Classical Philosophy and Thought (2 works) · Historical Linguistics and Language Studies (2 works) · Intentionality (2 works)

Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae