James Cargile
Biographic Data
| ID | 1135563 |
|---|---|
| NAME | James Cargile |
| GIVEN NAMES | James |
| FAMILY NAME | Cargile |
| SIGNATURE | CARGILE J |
| AFFILIATIONS | University of Virginia |
| VERIFIED | No |
| TOTAL WORKS | 11 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 8 |
| AUTHOR COUNT | 11 |
| EDITOR COUNT | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 1969 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2000 |
| H-INDEX | 1 |
Skepticism and Possibilities
One skeptical strategy against A's claim to know that P is to hold that it is logically possible for someone to have the same base (a term needing explaining) for P as A does in spite of its not being true that P. Philosophical replies have focussed on showing that these are not genuine possibilities. Whether they are can be an interesting question of metaphysics, but it is argued in this paper that this metaphysical discussion is not the proper …
Some Comments on Fatalism
Journal Article Some Comments on Fatalism Get access James Cargile James Cargile University of Virginia Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar The Philosophical Quarterly, Volume 46, Issue 182, January 1996, Pages 1–11, https://doi.org/10.2307/2956301 Published: 01 January 1996
Pseudo-Problems: How Analytic Philosophy Gets Done
Evidence and Inquiry by Susan Haack
Susan Haack's book is full of acute and cogently argued criticisms of prominent figures in contemporary epistemology. While these criticisms could stand by themselves, they also point to general conclusions about the subject and are in fact always used a means of advancing and clarifying a general view about justification, presented an alternative to two familiar schools of thought. Foundationalism is founded on two claims: that some (called basi…
Thought Experiments in Science and Philosophy
Preface: This volume originated in a conference on Place of Thought Experiments in Science and which was organized by us and held at the Center for Philosophy of Science at the University of Pittsburgh, April 18-20, 1986. The idea behind this conference was to encourage philosophers and scientists to talk to each other about the role of thought experiments in their various disciplines. These papers were either written for the conference, or were …
Rational Belief Systems
Paradoxes: A Study in Form and Predication
Preface Introduction 1. Subject-predicate form 2. Mill's theory of names 3. Platonism 4. Denotation and connotation 5. Meinongianism 6. Kinds of assertion and predication 7. Semantic paradoxes List of references Index
Newcomb's Paradox
In Reply to a Defense of Skepticism
IV. Davidson's notion of logical form 1
The Sorites Paradox
The Sorites Paradox
Pseudo-Problems: How Analytic Philosophy Gets Done
Thought Experiments in Science and Philosophy
Preface: This volume originated in a conference on Place of Thought Experiments in Science and which was organized by us and held at the Center for Philosophy of Science at the University of Pittsburgh, April 18-20, 1986. The idea behind this conference was to encourage philosophers and scientists to talk to each other about the role of thought experiments in their various disciplines. These papers were either written for the conference, or were …
Newcomb's Paradox
The Sorites Paradox
IV. Davidson's notion of logical form 1
In Reply to a Defense of Skepticism
Newcomb's Paradox
Rational Belief Systems
Paradoxes: A Study in Form and Predication
Preface Introduction 1. Subject-predicate form 2. Mill's theory of names 3. Platonism 4. Denotation and connotation 5. Meinongianism 6. Kinds of assertion and predication 7. Semantic paradoxes List of references Index
Thought Experiments in Science and Philosophy
Preface: This volume originated in a conference on Place of Thought Experiments in Science and which was organized by us and held at the Center for Philosophy of Science at the University of Pittsburgh, April 18-20, 1986. The idea behind this conference was to encourage philosophers and scientists to talk to each other about the role of thought experiments in their various disciplines. These papers were either written for the conference, or were …
Some Comments on Fatalism
Journal Article Some Comments on Fatalism Get access James Cargile James Cargile University of Virginia Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar The Philosophical Quarterly, Volume 46, Issue 182, January 1996, Pages 1–11, https://doi.org/10.2307/2956301 Published: 01 January 1996
Pseudo-Problems: How Analytic Philosophy Gets Done
Evidence and Inquiry by Susan Haack
Susan Haack's book is full of acute and cogently argued criticisms of prominent figures in contemporary epistemology. While these criticisms could stand by themselves, they also point to general conclusions about the subject and are in fact always used a means of advancing and clarifying a general view about justification, presented an alternative to two familiar schools of thought. Foundationalism is founded on two claims: that some (called basi…
Skepticism and Possibilities
One skeptical strategy against A's claim to know that P is to hold that it is logically possible for someone to have the same base (a term needing explaining) for P as A does in spite of its not being true that P. Philosophical replies have focussed on showing that these are not genuine possibilities. Whether they are can be an interesting question of metaphysics, but it is argued in this paper that this metaphysical discussion is not the proper …
Philosophy (11 works) · Epistemology (10 works) · Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (6 works) · Contemporary philosophy (4 works) · Philosophy (4 works) · Analytic philosophy (3 works) · Classical Philosophy and Thought (3 works) · Computer Science (3 works) · Philosophy and Theoretical Science (3 works) · Philosophy of science (3 works)