Peter Jan Schellens
Biographic Data
| ID | 114522 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Peter Jan Schellens |
| GIVEN NAMES | Peter Jan |
| FAMILY NAME | Schellens |
| SIGNATURE | SCHELLENS P J |
| AFFILIATIONS | Radboud University Nijmegen |
| ORCID | 0000-0002-3577-6808 |
| VERIFIED | Yes |
| TOTAL WORKS | 6 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 29 |
| AUTHOR COUNT | 6 |
| EDITOR COUNT | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2003 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2013 |
| H-INDEX | 4 |
The use of co-textual irony markers in written discourse
Authors of written texts may mark the use of verbal irony in a variety of ways. One possibility for doing so is the use of so-called co-textual markers of irony (i.e., support strategies that open up a non-serious frame). This study aims to classify and categorize these co-textual irony markers. A content analysis of 2,042 co-textual utterances of irony across four text genres (advertisements, newspaper columns, book and film reviews, and letters…
Type of evaluation and marking of irony: The role of perceived complexity and comprehension
Verbal Irony: Differences in Usage Across Written Genres
According to Gibbs and Colston, one of the biggest challenges for irony research is the uncovering of the various ways in which irony is used in discourse. This article takes up a genre-based approach to deal with this research challenge. In a content analysis of ironic utterances from six written genres (commercial and noncommercial advertisements, columns, cartoons, letters to the editor, book and film reviews), ironic utterances are compared o…
Finding Irony: An Introduction of the Verbal Irony Procedure (VIP)
This article introduces the Verbal Irony Procedure (VIP), a first systematic method for identifying irony in natural discourse. The first section discusses previous operationalizations of irony and demonstrates that these are not explicit about which criteria were used to separate irony from non-irony. The second section argues why irony can be defined as an “utterance with a literal evaluation that is implicitly contrary to its intended evaluati…
Evaluating municipal websites: A methodological comparison of three think-aloud variants
Writing profiles: The Effect of the Writing Mode on Pausing and Revision Patterns of Experienced Writers
Type of evaluation and marking of irony: The role of perceived complexity and comprehension
Writing profiles: The Effect of the Writing Mode on Pausing and Revision Patterns of Experienced Writers
Verbal Irony: Differences in Usage Across Written Genres
According to Gibbs and Colston, one of the biggest challenges for irony research is the uncovering of the various ways in which irony is used in discourse. This article takes up a genre-based approach to deal with this research challenge. In a content analysis of ironic utterances from six written genres (commercial and noncommercial advertisements, columns, cartoons, letters to the editor, book and film reviews), ironic utterances are compared o…
Evaluating municipal websites: A methodological comparison of three think-aloud variants
The use of co-textual irony markers in written discourse
Authors of written texts may mark the use of verbal irony in a variety of ways. One possibility for doing so is the use of so-called co-textual markers of irony (i.e., support strategies that open up a non-serious frame). This study aims to classify and categorize these co-textual irony markers. A content analysis of 2,042 co-textual utterances of irony across four text genres (advertisements, newspaper columns, book and film reviews, and letters…
Writing profiles: The Effect of the Writing Mode on Pausing and Revision Patterns of Experienced Writers
Evaluating municipal websites: A methodological comparison of three think-aloud variants
Finding Irony: An Introduction of the Verbal Irony Procedure (VIP)
This article introduces the Verbal Irony Procedure (VIP), a first systematic method for identifying irony in natural discourse. The first section discusses previous operationalizations of irony and demonstrates that these are not explicit about which criteria were used to separate irony from non-irony. The second section argues why irony can be defined as an “utterance with a literal evaluation that is implicitly contrary to its intended evaluati…
Type of evaluation and marking of irony: The role of perceived complexity and comprehension
Verbal Irony: Differences in Usage Across Written Genres
According to Gibbs and Colston, one of the biggest challenges for irony research is the uncovering of the various ways in which irony is used in discourse. This article takes up a genre-based approach to deal with this research challenge. In a content analysis of ironic utterances from six written genres (commercial and noncommercial advertisements, columns, cartoons, letters to the editor, book and film reviews), ironic utterances are compared o…
The use of co-textual irony markers in written discourse
Authors of written texts may mark the use of verbal irony in a variety of ways. One possibility for doing so is the use of so-called co-textual markers of irony (i.e., support strategies that open up a non-serious frame). This study aims to classify and categorize these co-textual irony markers. A content analysis of 2,042 co-textual utterances of irony across four text genres (advertisements, newspaper columns, book and film reviews, and letters…
Linguistics (5 works) · Psychology (5 works) · Computer Science (4 works) · Irony (4 works) · Language, Metaphor, and Cognition (4 works) · Linguistics and Discourse Analysis (4 works) · Philosophy (4 works) · Discourse Analysis in Language Studies (3 works) · Art (2 works) · Engineering (2 works)