Corina Andone
Biographic Data
| ID | 1158641 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Corina Andone |
| GIVEN NAMES | Corina |
| FAMILY NAME | Andone |
| SIGNATURE | ANDONE C |
| AFFILIATIONS | University of Amsterdam |
| VERIFIED | No |
| TOTAL WORKS | 6 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 40 |
| AUTHOR COUNT | 6 |
| EDITOR COUNT | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2005 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2024 |
| H-INDEX | 2 |
Fallacies and biases
When processing political arguments, people are strongly affected by their prior ideological beliefs. Political cognition often relies on two types of ideological biases. Firstly, confirmation bias leads addressees of political communication to accept arguments that affirm their preferred ideological positions. Secondly, disconfirmation bias probes reasoners to reject arguments that provide attitudinally incongruent evidence. Here, we report the …
The use of clarificatory metaphors in argumentative discourse in British Public Bill Committee debates
In this paper, we aim to explain how metaphors can be employed for clarificatory purposes in British parliamentary debates. These debates typically involve an exchange of arguments concerning complex issues, which more often than not may require clarification. In clarifying something complex, metaphors are often employed in which an unfamiliar and abstract concept is compared to a more familiar and concrete concept. Because the choice of metaphor…
Figurative analogies and how they are resisted in British Public Bill Committee debates
This paper studies metaphor use in British Public Bill Committee debates. It focuses on the way in which legislators frame their arguments in metaphorical terms under the form of figurative analogies. Because these figurative analogies can be misleading by oversimplifying the issue under discussion, resisting them by putting forward counter-argumentation is a crucial and necessary skill. The purpose of this paper is to explore the phenomenon of c…
I did not say that the government should be plundering anybody’s savings
This paper examines how politicians employ metaphors to express starting points in British parliamentary debates. Because these metaphors are conceptual tools that may have presuppositions and entailments that are not in line with the ideas and values of all discussion parties, political opponents can resist them by advancing argumentative criticisms. This paper aims to explore how different types of metaphor can be used to express starting point…
A World of Others' Words. Cross-Cultural Perspectives on Intertextuality
A Systematic Theory of Argumentation. The Pragma-Dialectical Approach
A World of Others' Words. Cross-Cultural Perspectives on Intertextuality
I did not say that the government should be plundering anybody’s savings
This paper examines how politicians employ metaphors to express starting points in British parliamentary debates. Because these metaphors are conceptual tools that may have presuppositions and entailments that are not in line with the ideas and values of all discussion parties, political opponents can resist them by advancing argumentative criticisms. This paper aims to explore how different types of metaphor can be used to express starting point…
A Systematic Theory of Argumentation. The Pragma-Dialectical Approach
A Systematic Theory of Argumentation. The Pragma-Dialectical Approach
A World of Others' Words. Cross-Cultural Perspectives on Intertextuality
Figurative analogies and how they are resisted in British Public Bill Committee debates
This paper studies metaphor use in British Public Bill Committee debates. It focuses on the way in which legislators frame their arguments in metaphorical terms under the form of figurative analogies. Because these figurative analogies can be misleading by oversimplifying the issue under discussion, resisting them by putting forward counter-argumentation is a crucial and necessary skill. The purpose of this paper is to explore the phenomenon of c…
I did not say that the government should be plundering anybody’s savings
This paper examines how politicians employ metaphors to express starting points in British parliamentary debates. Because these metaphors are conceptual tools that may have presuppositions and entailments that are not in line with the ideas and values of all discussion parties, political opponents can resist them by advancing argumentative criticisms. This paper aims to explore how different types of metaphor can be used to express starting point…
The use of clarificatory metaphors in argumentative discourse in British Public Bill Committee debates
In this paper, we aim to explain how metaphors can be employed for clarificatory purposes in British parliamentary debates. These debates typically involve an exchange of arguments concerning complex issues, which more often than not may require clarification. In clarifying something complex, metaphors are often employed in which an unfamiliar and abstract concept is compared to a more familiar and concrete concept. Because the choice of metaphor…
Fallacies and biases
When processing political arguments, people are strongly affected by their prior ideological beliefs. Political cognition often relies on two types of ideological biases. Firstly, confirmation bias leads addressees of political communication to accept arguments that affirm their preferred ideological positions. Secondly, disconfirmation bias probes reasoners to reject arguments that provide attitudinally incongruent evidence. Here, we report the …
Epistemology (4 works) · Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies (4 works) · Language, Metaphor, and Cognition (4 works) · Linguistics (4 works) · Sociology (4 works) · Metaphor (3 works) · Philosophy (3 works) · Philosophy (3 works) · Political science (3 works) · Argumentation theory (2 works)