J Riley
Dados Biográficos
| ID | 11649 |
|---|---|
| NOME | J Riley |
| PRENOMES | J |
| SOBRENOME | Riley |
| ASSINATURA | RILEY J |
| AFILIAÇÕES | Tulane University |
| ORCID | 0009-0007-8705-9505 |
| VERIFICADO | Sim |
| TOTAL DE OBRAS | 37 |
| TOTAL DE CITAÇÕES | 73 |
| TOTAL COMO AUTOR | 37 |
| TOTAL COMO EDITOR | 0 |
| PRIMEIRO ANO DE PUBLICAÇÃO | 1985 |
| ANO MAIS RECENTE DE PUBLICAÇÃO | 2024 |
| ÍNDICE H | 5 |
Trade, Piecework, and the Liberty Principle
John Stuart Mill does not contradict himself in On Liberty with respect to the issue of piecework, contrary to Dale E. Miller's charge that he does. Miller fails to understand that the liberty principle (LP) limits society's authority to regulate trade in that society has no legitimate authority to prohibit or make unduly expensive a buyer's post-trade use of his purchased product in self-regarding ways. LP gives an employer who has purchased lab…
Resolving Mill’s Absolutism Problem
The absolutist status Mill assigns to his liberty principle (LP) is incompatible with standard utilitarian maximizing reasoning. But LP is compatible with his non-standard utilitarianism, whose extraordinary structure is clarified using a “consequentializing” lens. This involves enlarging outcomes to include not only the downstream consequences of self-regarding actions but also the actions themselves and the agent’s liberty of choosing them usin…
Actionable social science can guide community level wildfire solutions. An illustration from North Central Washington, US
In this study we illustrate the value of social data compiled at the community scale to guide a local wildfire mitigation and education effort. The four contiguous fire-prone study communities in North Central Washington, US, fall within the same jurisdictional fire service boundary and within one US census block group. Across the four communities, similar attitudes toward wildfire were observed. However, significant differences were found on the…
Justice Under Capitalism
Liberal Pluralism and Common Decency
John Stuart Mill
John Stuart Mill (b. 1806-d. 1873) was a brilliant philosopher who also displayed a passion for justice and equal rights. He represents the British empiricist "school of experience" at its finest, a school that includes luminaries such as John Locke, David Hume, David Hartley, Jeremy Bentham, James Mill, and Alexander Bain. He was a naturalist who held that humans are to be understood as belonging to the natural order. He was also a phenomenalist…
John Stuart Mill
Book Review| December 01 2016 John Stuart Mill: Political Economist John Stuart Mill: Political Economist. By Hollander, Samuel. Singapore: World Scientific Publishing, 2015. xxvi; 573 pp. Cloth $138.00. Jonathan Riley Jonathan Riley Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google History of Political Economy (2016) 48 (4): 752–758. https://doi.org/10.1215/00182702-3687355 Cite Icon Cite Share Icon Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn MailT…
Welfare
Integrating Ethics into Science Education and Research
There is this enormous mystery waiting to be unlocked, and the BRAIN initiative will change that by giving scientists the tools they need to get a dynamic picture of the brain in action and better understand how we think and how we learn and how we remember. And that knowledge could be-will be-transformative
Isaiah Berlin’s “Pelagian Soul
Isaiah Berlin’s “Minimum of Common Moral Ground
Isaiah Berlin’s political thought consistently combines tragic value pluralism with moral priority for a minimum sphere of individual liberty which is defined and protected by a core set of basic human rights. His fundamental concept of a common moral minimum includes multiple components, including the idea that there is a common moral world of plural and conflicting incommensurable objective values and the idea that humans share a common nucleus…
Central Works of Philosophy Volume 2
CENTRAL WORKS OF PHILOSOPHY is a multi-volume set of essays on the core texts of the western philosophical tradition. From Plato's Republic to the present day, the volumes range over 2,500 years of philosophical writing covering the best, most representative, and most influential work of some of our greatest philosophers. Each essay has been specially commissioned and provides an overview of the work and clear and authoritative exposition of its …
Mill’s extraordinary utilitarian moral theory
D.G. Brown’s revisionist interpretation, despite its interest, misrepresents Mill’s moral theory as outlined in Utilitarianism . Mill’s utilitarianism is extraordinary because it explicitly aims to maximize general happiness both in point of quality and quantity. It encompasses spheres of life beyond morality, and its structure cannot be understood without clarification of his much-maligned doctrine that some kinds of pleasant feelings are qualit…
Millian Qualitative Superiorities and Utilitarianism, Part II
I continue my argument that Millian qualitative superiorities are infinite superiorities: one pleasant feeling, or type of pleasant feeling, is qualitatively superior to another in Mill's sense if and only if even a bit of the superior is more pleasant (and thus more valuable) than any finite quantity of the inferior, however large. This gives rise to a hierarchy of higher and lower pleasures such that a reasonable hedonist always refuses to sacr…
Millian Qualitative Superiorities and Utilitarianism, Part I
Arrhenius and Rabinowicz (henceforth, AR) have argued that Millian qualitative superiorities are possible without assuming that any pleasure, or type of pleasure, is infinitely superior to another. But AR's analysis is fatally flawed in the context of ethical hedonism, where the assumption in question is necessary and sufficient for Millian qualitative superiorities. Marginalist analysis of the sort pressed by AR continues to have a valid role to…
Utilitarian Liberalism
John Gray’s hostile reading of J.S. Mill’s utilitarian doctrine of individual liberty and social authority is rejected in favour of a more sympathetic reading. According to the latter, Mill’s doctrine says that every civilized society ought to distribute equal rights to complete liberty of self‐regarding conduct. Although clarification of the relevant terms is required, utilitarian calculations are not needed to understand or apply this principle…
Liberal Rights in a Pareto-optimal Code
A Millian response is presented to Sen's celebrated Paretian liberal impossibility theorem. It is argued that Millian Paretian liberalism is possible, if the application of Paretian norms is restricted to the selection of an optimal code of liberal justice and rights, as well as to individual choices made in compliance with the rules of the code. Key steps in outlining the Millian response include suitably modifying Sen's social choice formulatio…
Genes, Memes and Justice
Ken Binmore argues that justice consists in a proportional bargaining equilibrium of a ‘game of morals’, which corresponds to a Nash bargaining equilibrium of a ‘game of life’. His argument seems unassailable if rational agents are predominantly self-interested, an assumption that he is apparently willing to make on the grounds that human behaviour is ultimately constrained in accord with the selfish gene paradigm. But there is no compelling scie…
Central Works of Philosophy
CENTRAL WORKS OF PHILOSOPHY is a multi-volume set of essays on the core texts of the western philosophical tradition. From Plato's Republic to the present day, the volumes range over 2,500 years of philosophical writing covering the best, most representative, and most influential work of some of our greatest philosophers. Each essay has been specially commissioned and provides an overview of the work and clear and authoritative exposition of its …
John Stuart Mill
A remarkable aspect of John Stuart Mill's argument in On Liberty (1859) is his claim to be defending “one very simple principle”: that “the only purpose for which power can be rightfully exercised over any member of a civilized community, against his will, is to prevent harm to others. His own good, either physical or moral, is not a sufficient warrant” (OL i.9; Mill 1977: 223, emphasis added). Prevention of harm to others is a necessary conditio…
J. S. Mill's Doctrine of Freedom of Expression
Mill's free speech doctrine is distinct from, yet compatible with, his central principle of ‘purely self-regarding’ liberty. Using the crucial analogy with trade, I claim that he defends a broad laissez-faire policy for expression, even though expression is ‘social’ or other-regarding conduct and thus legitimately subject to social regulation. An expedient laissez-faire policy admits of exceptions because speakers can sometimes cause such severe …
Routledge Philosophy Guidebook to Mill on Liberty
This Routledge Philosophy GuideBook introduces John Stuart Mill and one of his major works, On Liberty. We see that in On Liberty Mill outlines the importance of moral rights, respect for rule of law, and individuality.Written with students in mind, Jonathan Riley gracefully eases the reader into Mill's work, life, and philosophy. An ideal read for those coming to Mill for the first time, and for anyone with an interest in political philosophy.
Interpreting Mill's Qualitative Hedonism
Against Schmidt‐Petri's claim, I argue that John Stuart Mill is committed to the view that one pleasure is higher in quality than another if and only if at least a majority of those people who are competently acquainted with both always prefer the one no matter how much of the other is offered. I support my reading with solid textual evidence; none such is provided by Schmidt‐Petri in support of his contrary interpretation that qualitative superi…
Defending Cultural Pluralism
Evaluation de la philosophie politique d'I. Berlin, entre l'interpretation d'une defense esthetique du pluralisme culturel chez G. Kateb, d'une part, et l'interpretation d'un rationalisme liberal chez J. Gray, d'autre part. L'A. montre que Berlin defend un pluralisme culturel limite fonde sur la priorite des droits individuels et l'appreciation esthetique des etres humains
Interpreting Berlin's Liberalism
I argue that Isaiah Berlin's pluralistic liberalism is best interpreted as a sophisticated form of liberal rationalism, as Berlin himself suggests. His value pluralism, even if it is viewed (as his critics typically view it, with considerable justification) as claiming that any choice between conflicting incommensurable values cannot be a rational choice, does not subvert his liberalism. Rather, this agonistic pluralism emanates from his liberal …
J. S. Mill's Liberal Utilitarian Assessment of Capitalism Versus Socialism
John Stuart Mill argued, in his Principles of Political Economy (1848, 7th edn., 1871), that existing laws and customs of private property ought to be reformed to promote a far more egalitarian form of capitalism than hitherto observed anywhere. He went on to suggest that such an ideal capitalism might evolve spontaneously into a decentralized socialism involving a market system of competing worker co-operatives. That possibility of market social…
Interpreting Berlin's Liberalism
I argue that Isaiah Berlin's pluralistic liberalism is best interpreted as a sophisticated form of liberal rationalism, as Berlin himself suggests. His value pluralism, even if it is viewed (as his critics typically view it, with considerable justification) as claiming that any choice between conflicting incommensurable values cannot be a rational choice, does not subvert his liberalism. Rather, this agonistic pluralism emanates from his liberal …
J. S. Mill's Doctrine of Freedom of Expression
Mill's free speech doctrine is distinct from, yet compatible with, his central principle of ‘purely self-regarding’ liberty. Using the crucial analogy with trade, I claim that he defends a broad laissez-faire policy for expression, even though expression is ‘social’ or other-regarding conduct and thus legitimately subject to social regulation. An expedient laissez-faire policy admits of exceptions because speakers can sometimes cause such severe …
On Quantities and Qualities of Pleasure
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content
Defending Cultural Pluralism
Evaluation de la philosophie politique d'I. Berlin, entre l'interpretation d'une defense esthetique du pluralisme culturel chez G. Kateb, d'une part, et l'interpretation d'un rationalisme liberal chez J. Gray, d'autre part. L'A. montre que Berlin defend un pluralisme culturel limite fonde sur la priorite des droits individuels et l'appreciation esthetique des etres humains
Is Qualitative Hedonism Incoherent
Geoffrey Scarre has recently argued that the version of qualitative hedonism which I attribute to Mill is unsatisfactory for various reasons. In his view, even if it is formally compatible with value monism, ‘the Mill/Riley line’ involves non-hedonistic elements and offers an implausible account of the relationship between ‘higher’ and ‘lower’ pleasures. In this paper, I show that his objections, which are similar in spirit to those pressed earli…
One Very Simple Principle’
John Gray, much influenced by Isaiah Berlin and building on work by the late John Rees and the late Fred Berger, has recently stated three ‘fatal’ objections which virtually all analysts seem to find persuasive against John Stuart Mill's classic doctrine of liberty. First, Gray thinks it ‘an obvious objection to Mill's project that conceptions of harm vary with competing moral outlooks, so that no Principle of Liberty whose application turns on j…
Millian Qualitative Superiorities and Utilitarianism, Part I
Arrhenius and Rabinowicz (henceforth, AR) have argued that Millian qualitative superiorities are possible without assuming that any pleasure, or type of pleasure, is infinitely superior to another. But AR's analysis is fatally flawed in the context of ethical hedonism, where the assumption in question is necessary and sufficient for Millian qualitative superiorities. Marginalist analysis of the sort pressed by AR continues to have a valid role to…
Interpreting Mill's Qualitative Hedonism
Against Schmidt‐Petri's claim, I argue that John Stuart Mill is committed to the view that one pleasure is higher in quality than another if and only if at least a majority of those people who are competently acquainted with both always prefer the one no matter how much of the other is offered. I support my reading with solid textual evidence; none such is provided by Schmidt‐Petri in support of his contrary interpretation that qualitative superi…
An Econometric Model of Merseyside
MINFORD P., STONEY P., RILEY J. and WEBB B. (1994) An econometric model of Merseyside: validation and policy simulations, Reg. Studies 28, 563–576. The paper estimates an econometric model of Merseyside on annual data. The model is derived from a Heckscher–Ohlin framework for the traded sector, set beside a non-traded sector and facing a positively sloped supply curve of manual labour whose reservation wage is set by unemployment benefits. With a…
Liberal Utilitarianism
Journal Article Liberal Utilitarianism: Social Choice Theory and J. S. Mill's Philosophy Get access Liberal Utilitarianism: Social Choice Theory and J. S. Mill's Philosophy. By JONATHAN RILEY. (Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press, 1988. Pp. xiv + 398. £25.00, US $39.50 hardback. ISBN 0 521 30692 2.) Prasanta K. Pattanaik Prasanta K. Pattanaik University of Birmingham Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google …
Isaiah Berlin’s “Minimum of Common Moral Ground
Isaiah Berlin’s political thought consistently combines tragic value pluralism with moral priority for a minimum sphere of individual liberty which is defined and protected by a core set of basic human rights. His fundamental concept of a common moral minimum includes multiple components, including the idea that there is a common moral world of plural and conflicting incommensurable objective values and the idea that humans share a common nucleus…
On the Possibility of Liberal Democracy
A complex liberal version of utilitarianism is introduced which bears similarities to John Stuart Mill's moral and political philosophy and offers a promising approach to liberal democratic theory. Formally, liberal utilitarianism is represented as a type of generalized social welfare functional which maps any given set of individual vector-valued utility functions into a social ordering. The generalized social welfare functional in question reli…
Trade, Piecework, and the Liberty Principle
John Stuart Mill does not contradict himself in On Liberty with respect to the issue of piecework, contrary to Dale E. Miller's charge that he does. Miller fails to understand that the liberty principle (LP) limits society's authority to regulate trade in that society has no legitimate authority to prohibit or make unduly expensive a buyer's post-trade use of his purchased product in self-regarding ways. LP gives an employer who has purchased lab…
Millian Qualitative Superiorities and Utilitarianism, Part II
I continue my argument that Millian qualitative superiorities are infinite superiorities: one pleasant feeling, or type of pleasant feeling, is qualitatively superior to another in Mill's sense if and only if even a bit of the superior is more pleasant (and thus more valuable) than any finite quantity of the inferior, however large. This gives rise to a hierarchy of higher and lower pleasures such that a reasonable hedonist always refuses to sacr…
Individuality, Custom and Progress
If harm is restricted to mean perceptible damage suffered by an agent against his wishes, so that his mere dislike with no evidence of injury is excluded, then Mill's liberty principle arguably is ‘one very simple principle’ as he claims. But even so, what of John Gray's charge that the liberty principle relies on a ‘radically defective’ notion of individuality or autonomy that is incompatible with every civil society's cultural and moral traditi…
On the Possibility of Liberal Democracy
A complex liberal version of utilitarianism is introduced which bears similarities to John Stuart Mill's moral and political philosophy and offers a promising approach to liberal democratic theory. Formally, liberal utilitarianism is represented as a type of generalized social welfare functional which maps any given set of individual vector-valued utility functions into a social ordering. The generalized social welfare functional in question reli…
Generalized social welfare functionals
Liberal Utilitarianism
Journal Article Liberal Utilitarianism: Social Choice Theory and J. S. Mill's Philosophy Get access Liberal Utilitarianism: Social Choice Theory and J. S. Mill's Philosophy. By JONATHAN RILEY. (Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press, 1988. Pp. xiv + 398. £25.00, US $39.50 hardback. ISBN 0 521 30692 2.) Prasanta K. Pattanaik Prasanta K. Pattanaik University of Birmingham Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google …
One Very Simple Principle’
John Gray, much influenced by Isaiah Berlin and building on work by the late John Rees and the late Fred Berger, has recently stated three ‘fatal’ objections which virtually all analysts seem to find persuasive against John Stuart Mill's classic doctrine of liberty. First, Gray thinks it ‘an obvious objection to Mill's project that conceptions of harm vary with competing moral outlooks, so that no Principle of Liberty whose application turns on j…
Individuality, Custom and Progress
If harm is restricted to mean perceptible damage suffered by an agent against his wishes, so that his mere dislike with no evidence of injury is excluded, then Mill's liberty principle arguably is ‘one very simple principle’ as he claims. But even so, what of John Gray's charge that the liberty principle relies on a ‘radically defective’ notion of individuality or autonomy that is incompatible with every civil society's cultural and moral traditi…
Private Property and the Limits of American Constitutionalism
Journal Article Private Property and the Limits of American Constitutionalism: The Madisonian Framework and Its Legacy Get access Nedelsky Jennifer, Private Property and the Limits of American Constitutionalism: The Madisonian Framework and Its Legacy. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press, 1990. xiii, + 343 p. $29.95 cloth. Jonathan M. Riley Jonathan M. Riley Tulane University Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academ…
On Quantities and Qualities of Pleasure
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content
An Econometric Model of Merseyside
MINFORD P., STONEY P., RILEY J. and WEBB B. (1994) An econometric model of Merseyside: validation and policy simulations, Reg. Studies 28, 563–576. The paper estimates an econometric model of Merseyside on annual data. The model is derived from a Heckscher–Ohlin framework for the traded sector, set beside a non-traded sector and facing a positively sloped supply curve of manual labour whose reservation wage is set by unemployment benefits. With a…
J. S. Mill's Liberal Utilitarian Assessment of Capitalism Versus Socialism
John Stuart Mill argued, in his Principles of Political Economy (1848, 7th edn., 1871), that existing laws and customs of private property ought to be reformed to promote a far more egalitarian form of capitalism than hitherto observed anywhere. He went on to suggest that such an ideal capitalism might evolve spontaneously into a decentralized socialism involving a market system of competing worker co-operatives. That possibility of market social…
Trade, technology and labour markets in the world economy, 1970–90
Whether the plight of OECD unskilled labour is due to trade or technology is examined with a general equilibrium Heckscher‐Ohlin calibrated model of North and South. Technology transfer from North to South via direct foreign investment in unskilled‐labour‐intensive manufacturing industries is identified as the trade shock. Simulations are carried out for this and other relevant shocks, and compared with the facts of the 1970–90 period. Weights on…
Is Qualitative Hedonism Incoherent
Geoffrey Scarre has recently argued that the version of qualitative hedonism which I attribute to Mill is unsatisfactory for various reasons. In his view, even if it is formally compatible with value monism, ‘the Mill/Riley line’ involves non-hedonistic elements and offers an implausible account of the relationship between ‘higher’ and ‘lower’ pleasures. In this paper, I show that his objections, which are similar in spirit to those pressed earli…
People in Political Science
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. As you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button
Interpreting Berlin's Liberalism
I argue that Isaiah Berlin's pluralistic liberalism is best interpreted as a sophisticated form of liberal rationalism, as Berlin himself suggests. His value pluralism, even if it is viewed (as his critics typically view it, with considerable justification) as claiming that any choice between conflicting incommensurable values cannot be a rational choice, does not subvert his liberalism. Rather, this agonistic pluralism emanates from his liberal …
Defending Cultural Pluralism
Evaluation de la philosophie politique d'I. Berlin, entre l'interpretation d'une defense esthetique du pluralisme culturel chez G. Kateb, d'une part, et l'interpretation d'un rationalisme liberal chez J. Gray, d'autre part. L'A. montre que Berlin defend un pluralisme culturel limite fonde sur la priorite des droits individuels et l'appreciation esthetique des etres humains
Routledge Philosophy Guidebook to Mill on Liberty
This Routledge Philosophy GuideBook introduces John Stuart Mill and one of his major works, On Liberty. We see that in On Liberty Mill outlines the importance of moral rights, respect for rule of law, and individuality.Written with students in mind, Jonathan Riley gracefully eases the reader into Mill's work, life, and philosophy. An ideal read for those coming to Mill for the first time, and for anyone with an interest in political philosophy.
Interpreting Mill's Qualitative Hedonism
Against Schmidt‐Petri's claim, I argue that John Stuart Mill is committed to the view that one pleasure is higher in quality than another if and only if at least a majority of those people who are competently acquainted with both always prefer the one no matter how much of the other is offered. I support my reading with solid textual evidence; none such is provided by Schmidt‐Petri in support of his contrary interpretation that qualitative superi…
Central Works of Philosophy
CENTRAL WORKS OF PHILOSOPHY is a multi-volume set of essays on the core texts of the western philosophical tradition. From Plato's Republic to the present day, the volumes range over 2,500 years of philosophical writing covering the best, most representative, and most influential work of some of our greatest philosophers. Each essay has been specially commissioned and provides an overview of the work and clear and authoritative exposition of its …
John Stuart Mill
A remarkable aspect of John Stuart Mill's argument in On Liberty (1859) is his claim to be defending “one very simple principle”: that “the only purpose for which power can be rightfully exercised over any member of a civilized community, against his will, is to prevent harm to others. His own good, either physical or moral, is not a sufficient warrant” (OL i.9; Mill 1977: 223, emphasis added). Prevention of harm to others is a necessary conditio…
J. S. Mill's Doctrine of Freedom of Expression
Mill's free speech doctrine is distinct from, yet compatible with, his central principle of ‘purely self-regarding’ liberty. Using the crucial analogy with trade, I claim that he defends a broad laissez-faire policy for expression, even though expression is ‘social’ or other-regarding conduct and thus legitimately subject to social regulation. An expedient laissez-faire policy admits of exceptions because speakers can sometimes cause such severe …
Utilitarian Liberalism
John Gray’s hostile reading of J.S. Mill’s utilitarian doctrine of individual liberty and social authority is rejected in favour of a more sympathetic reading. According to the latter, Mill’s doctrine says that every civilized society ought to distribute equal rights to complete liberty of self‐regarding conduct. Although clarification of the relevant terms is required, utilitarian calculations are not needed to understand or apply this principle…
Liberal Rights in a Pareto-optimal Code
A Millian response is presented to Sen's celebrated Paretian liberal impossibility theorem. It is argued that Millian Paretian liberalism is possible, if the application of Paretian norms is restricted to the selection of an optimal code of liberal justice and rights, as well as to individual choices made in compliance with the rules of the code. Key steps in outlining the Millian response include suitably modifying Sen's social choice formulatio…
Genes, Memes and Justice
Ken Binmore argues that justice consists in a proportional bargaining equilibrium of a ‘game of morals’, which corresponds to a Nash bargaining equilibrium of a ‘game of life’. His argument seems unassailable if rational agents are predominantly self-interested, an assumption that he is apparently willing to make on the grounds that human behaviour is ultimately constrained in accord with the selfish gene paradigm. But there is no compelling scie…
Millian Qualitative Superiorities and Utilitarianism, Part I
Arrhenius and Rabinowicz (henceforth, AR) have argued that Millian qualitative superiorities are possible without assuming that any pleasure, or type of pleasure, is infinitely superior to another. But AR's analysis is fatally flawed in the context of ethical hedonism, where the assumption in question is necessary and sufficient for Millian qualitative superiorities. Marginalist analysis of the sort pressed by AR continues to have a valid role to…
Millian Qualitative Superiorities and Utilitarianism, Part II
I continue my argument that Millian qualitative superiorities are infinite superiorities: one pleasant feeling, or type of pleasant feeling, is qualitatively superior to another in Mill's sense if and only if even a bit of the superior is more pleasant (and thus more valuable) than any finite quantity of the inferior, however large. This gives rise to a hierarchy of higher and lower pleasures such that a reasonable hedonist always refuses to sacr…
Mill’s extraordinary utilitarian moral theory
D.G. Brown’s revisionist interpretation, despite its interest, misrepresents Mill’s moral theory as outlined in Utilitarianism . Mill’s utilitarianism is extraordinary because it explicitly aims to maximize general happiness both in point of quality and quantity. It encompasses spheres of life beyond morality, and its structure cannot be understood without clarification of his much-maligned doctrine that some kinds of pleasant feelings are qualit…
Political science (25 obras) · Law (23 obras) · Philosophy (21 obras) · Sociology (21 obras) · Law and economics (19 obras) · Law (18 obras) · Epistemology (17 obras) · Mill (15 obras) · Philosophy (15 obras) · Economics (13 obras)