Nils-Hennes Stear
Biographic Data
| ID | 1175819 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Nils-Hennes Stear |
| GIVEN NAMES | Nils-Hennes |
| FAMILY NAME | Stear |
| SIGNATURE | STEAR N |
| AFFILIATIONS | Instituto de Filosofía |
| ORCID | 0000-0002-7628-2097 |
| VERIFIED | Yes |
| TOTAL WORKS | 8 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 26 |
| WORKS AS AUTHOR | 8 |
| WORKS AS EDITOR | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2009 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2025 |
| H-INDEX | 3 |
The Passenger
Personification and Objectification
A handful of scholars have connected objectification (treating people like objects) to personification (treating objects like people). The recurring idea is that personification may entail objectification and therefore share in the latter's ethical difficulties. This idea is defended by various feminist philosophers. They focus on how the connection manifests in the male, heterosexual consumption of pornography, grounding a constitutive ethical c…
Imagining in Oppressive Contexts, or What’s Wrong with Blackface
What is objectionable about “blacking up” or other comparable acts of imagining involving unethical attitudes? Can such imaginings be wrong, even if there are no harmful consequences and imaginers are not meant to apply these attitudes beyond the fiction? In this article, we argue that blackface—and imagining in general—can be ethically flawed in virtue of being oppressive, in virtue of either its content or what imaginers do with it, where both …
Immoralism is Obviously True
The Ethical Question asks whether ethical values in artworks determine their aesthetic value and, if so, how. I argue that the question is ambiguous between a direct and an indirect reading. I show how the indirect reading is philosophically uninteresting because it has an obvious answer: a view called 'immoralism'. I also show how most of the significant figures in the relevant literature address the indirect form of the question anyway-needless…
Fatal Prescription
Ethicism is the most comprehensively defended answer to the question regarding whether ethical properties determine aesthetic properties in artworks. According to ethicism, aesthetically relevant ethical flaws in artworks count as aesthetic flaws and aesthetically relevant ethical merits count as aesthetic merits. In this paper, I argue that ethicism's most significant argument, the Merited Response Argument (MRA) (and other moralist arguments li…
Conversations on Art and Aesthetics
When I say that Hans Maes’ Conversations on Art and Aesthetics is excellent, this is no mere attempt to make it onto some future dust jacket (also, did I mention? Very affordable!). Maes interviews ten of the most influential aestheticians of recent years: Jerrold Levinson, Arthur Danto, Cynthia Freeland, Carolyn Korsmeyer, Jenefer Robinson, Roger Scruton, Gregory Currie, Paul Guyer, Noël Carroll, and Kendall Walton. In conversations paired with …
In Other Shoes
In Other Shoes is a companion to Kendall Walton’s other essay collection, Marvellous Images, published seven years earlier. But careful study reveals considerable coherence; Walton reprises the same motifs throughout, though with different combinations and inflections, the book’s reverse chronology revealing how some of these ideas developed. Moreover, every paper exhibits the same accessible, sometimes homespun (‘by golly’ (101), ‘care beans’ (2…
Sadomasochism as Make-Believe
In “Rethinking Sadomasochism,” Patrick Hopkins challenges the “radical” feminist claim that sadomasochism is incompatible with feminism. He does so by appeal to the notion of “simulation.” I argue that Hopkins's conclusions are generally right, but they cannot be inferred from his “simulation” argument. I replace Hopkins's “simulation” with Kendall Walton's more sophisticated theory of “make-believe.” I use this theory to better argue that privat…
Sadomasochism as Make-Believe
In “Rethinking Sadomasochism,” Patrick Hopkins challenges the “radical” feminist claim that sadomasochism is incompatible with feminism. He does so by appeal to the notion of “simulation.” I argue that Hopkins's conclusions are generally right, but they cannot be inferred from his “simulation” argument. I replace Hopkins's “simulation” with Kendall Walton's more sophisticated theory of “make-believe.” I use this theory to better argue that privat…
Fatal Prescription
Ethicism is the most comprehensively defended answer to the question regarding whether ethical properties determine aesthetic properties in artworks. According to ethicism, aesthetically relevant ethical flaws in artworks count as aesthetic flaws and aesthetically relevant ethical merits count as aesthetic merits. In this paper, I argue that ethicism's most significant argument, the Merited Response Argument (MRA) (and other moralist arguments li…
Conversations on Art and Aesthetics
When I say that Hans Maes’ Conversations on Art and Aesthetics is excellent, this is no mere attempt to make it onto some future dust jacket (also, did I mention? Very affordable!). Maes interviews ten of the most influential aestheticians of recent years: Jerrold Levinson, Arthur Danto, Cynthia Freeland, Carolyn Korsmeyer, Jenefer Robinson, Roger Scruton, Gregory Currie, Paul Guyer, Noël Carroll, and Kendall Walton. In conversations paired with …
Immoralism is Obviously True
The Ethical Question asks whether ethical values in artworks determine their aesthetic value and, if so, how. I argue that the question is ambiguous between a direct and an indirect reading. I show how the indirect reading is philosophically uninteresting because it has an obvious answer: a view called 'immoralism'. I also show how most of the significant figures in the relevant literature address the indirect form of the question anyway-needless…
In Other Shoes
In Other Shoes is a companion to Kendall Walton’s other essay collection, Marvellous Images, published seven years earlier. But careful study reveals considerable coherence; Walton reprises the same motifs throughout, though with different combinations and inflections, the book’s reverse chronology revealing how some of these ideas developed. Moreover, every paper exhibits the same accessible, sometimes homespun (‘by golly’ (101), ‘care beans’ (2…
Sadomasochism as Make-Believe
In “Rethinking Sadomasochism,” Patrick Hopkins challenges the “radical” feminist claim that sadomasochism is incompatible with feminism. He does so by appeal to the notion of “simulation.” I argue that Hopkins's conclusions are generally right, but they cannot be inferred from his “simulation” argument. I replace Hopkins's “simulation” with Kendall Walton's more sophisticated theory of “make-believe.” I use this theory to better argue that privat…
In Other Shoes
In Other Shoes is a companion to Kendall Walton’s other essay collection, Marvellous Images, published seven years earlier. But careful study reveals considerable coherence; Walton reprises the same motifs throughout, though with different combinations and inflections, the book’s reverse chronology revealing how some of these ideas developed. Moreover, every paper exhibits the same accessible, sometimes homespun (‘by golly’ (101), ‘care beans’ (2…
Conversations on Art and Aesthetics
When I say that Hans Maes’ Conversations on Art and Aesthetics is excellent, this is no mere attempt to make it onto some future dust jacket (also, did I mention? Very affordable!). Maes interviews ten of the most influential aestheticians of recent years: Jerrold Levinson, Arthur Danto, Cynthia Freeland, Carolyn Korsmeyer, Jenefer Robinson, Roger Scruton, Gregory Currie, Paul Guyer, Noël Carroll, and Kendall Walton. In conversations paired with …
Fatal Prescription
Ethicism is the most comprehensively defended answer to the question regarding whether ethical properties determine aesthetic properties in artworks. According to ethicism, aesthetically relevant ethical flaws in artworks count as aesthetic flaws and aesthetically relevant ethical merits count as aesthetic merits. In this paper, I argue that ethicism's most significant argument, the Merited Response Argument (MRA) (and other moralist arguments li…
Immoralism is Obviously True
The Ethical Question asks whether ethical values in artworks determine their aesthetic value and, if so, how. I argue that the question is ambiguous between a direct and an indirect reading. I show how the indirect reading is philosophically uninteresting because it has an obvious answer: a view called 'immoralism'. I also show how most of the significant figures in the relevant literature address the indirect form of the question anyway-needless…
Imagining in Oppressive Contexts, or What’s Wrong with Blackface
What is objectionable about “blacking up” or other comparable acts of imagining involving unethical attitudes? Can such imaginings be wrong, even if there are no harmful consequences and imaginers are not meant to apply these attitudes beyond the fiction? In this article, we argue that blackface—and imagining in general—can be ethically flawed in virtue of being oppressive, in virtue of either its content or what imaginers do with it, where both …
Personification and Objectification
A handful of scholars have connected objectification (treating people like objects) to personification (treating objects like people). The recurring idea is that personification may entail objectification and therefore share in the latter's ethical difficulties. This idea is defended by various feminist philosophers. They focus on how the connection manifests in the male, heterosexual consumption of pornography, grounding a constitutive ethical c…
The Passenger
Philosophy (7 works) · Epistemology (6 works) · Philosophy (6 works) · Sociology (6 works) · Aesthetics (5 works) · Psychology (5 works) · Argument (complex analysis (4 works) · Art (4 works) · Linguistics (4 works) · Art history (3 works)