Saltar al contenido principal

ETHNOS_APP

Inicio • Búsqueda • Revistas • Lista 0

Taylor N Carlson

Datos Biográficos

ID1195941
NOMBRETaylor N Carlson
NOMBRESTaylor N
APELLIDOCarlson
FIRMACARLSON T N
AFILIACIONESUniversity of California San Diego
ORCID0000-0003-3564-9507
VERIFICADOSí
TOTAL DE OBRAS16
TOTAL DE CITAS172
TOTAL COMO AUTOR16
TOTAL COMO EDITOR0
PRIMER AÑO DE PUBLICACIÓN2016
AÑO MÁS RECIENTE DE PUBLICACIÓN2026
ÍNDICE H7
  • Do Political Discussion Partners Share Policy Priorities and Policy Frames?

    Open Access•Matthew T Pietryka, Amber E Boydstun et al.•ARTICLE•Political Behavior•2026

    To understand politics, people often rely on political discussion. Among the many ways that discussion may shape political perceptions, one possible mechanism is by promoting a shared sense of priorities— which issues are important. A second mechanism is by framing how people think about important issues. We examine these potential mechanisms by answering the descriptive question: Do policy priorities and policy frames tend to co-occur within pol…

  • You’re Making Us Look Bad

    Open Access•Elizabeth C Connors, Taylor N Carlson et al.•ARTICLE•Public Opinion Quarterly•2026•Referencias: 53

    Partisan elites and members of the public often have attitudes or engage in behavior that could embarrass copartisans. We examine this occurrence—what we call partisan embarrassment—by investigating how much partisans report feeling this embarrassment, what types of scenarios embarrass partisans, what types of partisans feel this embarrassment, and what the political ramifications of partisan embarrassment could be. We expect that when a copartis…

  • CueAnon

    Open Access•Benjamin S Noble, Taylor N Carlson•ARTICLE•Political Behavior•2025•Referencias: 39

  • Cross-Partisan Conversation Reduced Affective Polarization for Republicans and Democrats Even after the Contentious 2020 Election

    Erin L Rossiter, Erin Rossiter et al.•ARTICLE•The Journal of Politics•2024•Citada por: 6•Referencias: 8

  • Freedom of Expression in Interpersonal Interactions

    Open Access•Taylor N Carlson, Jaime E Settle•ARTICLE•PS Political Science & Politics•2023•Citada por: 3•Referencias: 15

    An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content

  • Not who you think? Exposure and vulnerability to misinformation

    Open Access•Nicolas M Anspach, Taylor N Carlson•ARTICLE•New Media & Society•2022•Citada por: 1•Referencias: 14

    Is exposure to false information necessary for misbelief? In this article, we consider the possibility that certain individuals hold misinformed beliefs without encountering misinformation, thus questioning for whom exposure to “fake news” is most deleterious. Using a pre-registered experiment on a diverse sample of 1079 US respondents, we find that the young, those with low information literacy, and those with high trust in government tend to ho…

  • Experimental Measurement of Misperception in Political Beliefs

    Open Access•Taylor N Carlson, Seth J Hill•ARTICLE•Journal of Experimental Political…•2021•Citada por: 8•Referencias: 9

    Recent research suggests widespread misperception about the political views of others. Measuring perceptions often relies on instruments that do not separate uncertainty from inaccuracy. We present new experimental measures of second-order political beliefs. To carefully measure political (mis)perceptions, we have subjects report beliefs as probabilities. To encourage accuracy, we provide micro-incentives for each response. To measure learning, w…

  • Political psychophysiology

    Open Access•Jaime E Settle, Matthew V Hibbing et al.•ARTICLE•Politics and the Life Sciences•2020•Citada por: 4•Referencias: 8

    The past decade has seen a rapid increase in the number of studies employing psychophysiological methods to explain variation in political attitudes and behavior. However, the collection, analysis, and interpretation of physiological data present novel challenges for political scientists unfamiliar with the underlying biological concepts and technical skills necessary for utilizing this approach. Our objective in this article is to maximize the e…

  • When campaigns call, who answers? Using observational data to enrich our understanding of phone mobilization

    Open Access•M Abrajano, Taylor N Carlson et al.•ARTICLE•Electoral Studies•2020•Citada por: 3•Referencias: 19

  • Political Discussion Networks and Political Engagement among Voters of Color

    Open Access•Taylor N Carlson, M Abrajano et al.•ARTICLE•Political Research Quarterly•2019•Citada por: 2•Referencias: 43

    Despite a large and growing literature documenting the powerful and positive role that political discussion networks exert on the political behavior among whites, we know little about how political discussion networks affect political behavior among voters of color. To fill this void in the existing literature, we conducted an original survey in California to gather information on a diverse group of registered voters’ political discussion network…

  • Follow Your Heart

    Open Access•Taylor N Carlson, Charles T Mcclean et al.•ARTICLE•Political Psychology•2019•Citada por: 7•Referencias: 65

    Most Americans are sorted into social networks that are largely politically homogeneous. A large body of political science research has explored the behavioral implications of being embedded in a politically homogeneous or heterogeneous network, but substantially less attention has been given to explaining why some people find themselves in politically homogeneous or heterogeneous social networks. In this article, we explore the psychological and…

  • Opting Out of Political Discussions

    Jaime E Settle, Taylor N Carlson•ARTICLE•Political Communication•2019•Citada por: 40•Referencias: 44

    Methodological limitations have hindered our ability to understand the conditions that make individuals seek or avoid political discussions. We introduce a methodological approach to assess communication preferences in contexts where these choices are difficult to measure. We conduct three experiments to examine how the characteristics of the people in a discussion, as well as its topic, influence an individual's "price" to participate. Participa…

  • Through the Grapevine

    Open Access•Taylor N Carlson•ARTICLE•American Political Science Review•2019•Citada por: 37•Referencias: 40

    Much of the US public acquires political information socially. However, the consequences of acquiring information from others instead of the media are under-explored. I conduct a "telephone-game" experiment to examine how information changes as it flows from official reports to news outlets to other people, finding that social information is empirically different from news articles. In a second experiment on a nationally representative sample, I …

  • What to Believe? Social Media Commentary and Belief in Misinformation

    Open Access•Nicolas M Anspach, Taylor N Carlson•ARTICLE•Political Behavior•2018•Citada por: 28•Referencias: 62

  • Modeling Political Information Transmission as a Game of Telephone

    Taylor N Carlson•ARTICLE•The Journal of Politics•2018•Citada por: 11•Referencias: 5

    Many individuals learn about politics from other people instead of directly from the media. While this could be a good way to reduce information costs, highly controlled lab experiments reveal that the information exchanged can be biased. These important lab experiments are so controlled, however, that they ignore the complexities of language inherent in real-world information transmission. In an effort to improve our understanding of how politic…

  • Political Chameleons

    Open Access•Taylor N Carlson, Jaime E Settle•ARTICLE•Political Behavior•2016•Citada por: 22•Referencias: 72

  • Opting Out of Political Discussions

    Jaime E Settle, Taylor N Carlson•ARTICLE•Political Communication•2019•Citada por: 40•Referencias: 44

    Methodological limitations have hindered our ability to understand the conditions that make individuals seek or avoid political discussions. We introduce a methodological approach to assess communication preferences in contexts where these choices are difficult to measure. We conduct three experiments to examine how the characteristics of the people in a discussion, as well as its topic, influence an individual's "price" to participate. Participa…

  • Through the Grapevine

    Open Access•Taylor N Carlson•ARTICLE•American Political Science Review•2019•Citada por: 37•Referencias: 40

    Much of the US public acquires political information socially. However, the consequences of acquiring information from others instead of the media are under-explored. I conduct a "telephone-game" experiment to examine how information changes as it flows from official reports to news outlets to other people, finding that social information is empirically different from news articles. In a second experiment on a nationally representative sample, I …

  • What to Believe? Social Media Commentary and Belief in Misinformation

    Open Access•Nicolas M Anspach, Taylor N Carlson•ARTICLE•Political Behavior•2018•Citada por: 28•Referencias: 62

  • Political Chameleons

    Open Access•Taylor N Carlson, Jaime E Settle•ARTICLE•Political Behavior•2016•Citada por: 22•Referencias: 72

  • Modeling Political Information Transmission as a Game of Telephone

    Taylor N Carlson•ARTICLE•The Journal of Politics•2018•Citada por: 11•Referencias: 5

    Many individuals learn about politics from other people instead of directly from the media. While this could be a good way to reduce information costs, highly controlled lab experiments reveal that the information exchanged can be biased. These important lab experiments are so controlled, however, that they ignore the complexities of language inherent in real-world information transmission. In an effort to improve our understanding of how politic…

  • Experimental Measurement of Misperception in Political Beliefs

    Open Access•Taylor N Carlson, Seth J Hill•ARTICLE•Journal of Experimental Political…•2021•Citada por: 8•Referencias: 9

    Recent research suggests widespread misperception about the political views of others. Measuring perceptions often relies on instruments that do not separate uncertainty from inaccuracy. We present new experimental measures of second-order political beliefs. To carefully measure political (mis)perceptions, we have subjects report beliefs as probabilities. To encourage accuracy, we provide micro-incentives for each response. To measure learning, w…

  • Follow Your Heart

    Open Access•Taylor N Carlson, Charles T Mcclean et al.•ARTICLE•Political Psychology•2019•Citada por: 7•Referencias: 65

    Most Americans are sorted into social networks that are largely politically homogeneous. A large body of political science research has explored the behavioral implications of being embedded in a politically homogeneous or heterogeneous network, but substantially less attention has been given to explaining why some people find themselves in politically homogeneous or heterogeneous social networks. In this article, we explore the psychological and…

  • Cross-Partisan Conversation Reduced Affective Polarization for Republicans and Democrats Even after the Contentious 2020 Election

    Erin L Rossiter, Erin Rossiter et al.•ARTICLE•The Journal of Politics•2024•Citada por: 6•Referencias: 8

  • Political psychophysiology

    Open Access•Jaime E Settle, Matthew V Hibbing et al.•ARTICLE•Politics and the Life Sciences•2020•Citada por: 4•Referencias: 8

    The past decade has seen a rapid increase in the number of studies employing psychophysiological methods to explain variation in political attitudes and behavior. However, the collection, analysis, and interpretation of physiological data present novel challenges for political scientists unfamiliar with the underlying biological concepts and technical skills necessary for utilizing this approach. Our objective in this article is to maximize the e…

  • Freedom of Expression in Interpersonal Interactions

    Open Access•Taylor N Carlson, Jaime E Settle•ARTICLE•PS Political Science & Politics•2023•Citada por: 3•Referencias: 15

    An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content

  • When campaigns call, who answers? Using observational data to enrich our understanding of phone mobilization

    Open Access•M Abrajano, Taylor N Carlson et al.•ARTICLE•Electoral Studies•2020•Citada por: 3•Referencias: 19

  • Political Discussion Networks and Political Engagement among Voters of Color

    Open Access•Taylor N Carlson, M Abrajano et al.•ARTICLE•Political Research Quarterly•2019•Citada por: 2•Referencias: 43

    Despite a large and growing literature documenting the powerful and positive role that political discussion networks exert on the political behavior among whites, we know little about how political discussion networks affect political behavior among voters of color. To fill this void in the existing literature, we conducted an original survey in California to gather information on a diverse group of registered voters’ political discussion network…

  • Not who you think? Exposure and vulnerability to misinformation

    Open Access•Nicolas M Anspach, Taylor N Carlson•ARTICLE•New Media & Society•2022•Citada por: 1•Referencias: 14

    Is exposure to false information necessary for misbelief? In this article, we consider the possibility that certain individuals hold misinformed beliefs without encountering misinformation, thus questioning for whom exposure to “fake news” is most deleterious. Using a pre-registered experiment on a diverse sample of 1079 US respondents, we find that the young, those with low information literacy, and those with high trust in government tend to ho…

  • Political Chameleons

    Open Access•Taylor N Carlson, Jaime E Settle•ARTICLE•Political Behavior•2016•Citada por: 22•Referencias: 72

  • What to Believe? Social Media Commentary and Belief in Misinformation

    Open Access•Nicolas M Anspach, Taylor N Carlson•ARTICLE•Political Behavior•2018•Citada por: 28•Referencias: 62

  • Modeling Political Information Transmission as a Game of Telephone

    Taylor N Carlson•ARTICLE•The Journal of Politics•2018•Citada por: 11•Referencias: 5

    Many individuals learn about politics from other people instead of directly from the media. While this could be a good way to reduce information costs, highly controlled lab experiments reveal that the information exchanged can be biased. These important lab experiments are so controlled, however, that they ignore the complexities of language inherent in real-world information transmission. In an effort to improve our understanding of how politic…

  • Political Discussion Networks and Political Engagement among Voters of Color

    Open Access•Taylor N Carlson, M Abrajano et al.•ARTICLE•Political Research Quarterly•2019•Citada por: 2•Referencias: 43

    Despite a large and growing literature documenting the powerful and positive role that political discussion networks exert on the political behavior among whites, we know little about how political discussion networks affect political behavior among voters of color. To fill this void in the existing literature, we conducted an original survey in California to gather information on a diverse group of registered voters’ political discussion network…

  • Follow Your Heart

    Open Access•Taylor N Carlson, Charles T Mcclean et al.•ARTICLE•Political Psychology•2019•Citada por: 7•Referencias: 65

    Most Americans are sorted into social networks that are largely politically homogeneous. A large body of political science research has explored the behavioral implications of being embedded in a politically homogeneous or heterogeneous network, but substantially less attention has been given to explaining why some people find themselves in politically homogeneous or heterogeneous social networks. In this article, we explore the psychological and…

  • Opting Out of Political Discussions

    Jaime E Settle, Taylor N Carlson•ARTICLE•Political Communication•2019•Citada por: 40•Referencias: 44

    Methodological limitations have hindered our ability to understand the conditions that make individuals seek or avoid political discussions. We introduce a methodological approach to assess communication preferences in contexts where these choices are difficult to measure. We conduct three experiments to examine how the characteristics of the people in a discussion, as well as its topic, influence an individual's "price" to participate. Participa…

  • Through the Grapevine

    Open Access•Taylor N Carlson•ARTICLE•American Political Science Review•2019•Citada por: 37•Referencias: 40

    Much of the US public acquires political information socially. However, the consequences of acquiring information from others instead of the media are under-explored. I conduct a "telephone-game" experiment to examine how information changes as it flows from official reports to news outlets to other people, finding that social information is empirically different from news articles. In a second experiment on a nationally representative sample, I …

  • Political psychophysiology

    Open Access•Jaime E Settle, Matthew V Hibbing et al.•ARTICLE•Politics and the Life Sciences•2020•Citada por: 4•Referencias: 8

    The past decade has seen a rapid increase in the number of studies employing psychophysiological methods to explain variation in political attitudes and behavior. However, the collection, analysis, and interpretation of physiological data present novel challenges for political scientists unfamiliar with the underlying biological concepts and technical skills necessary for utilizing this approach. Our objective in this article is to maximize the e…

  • When campaigns call, who answers? Using observational data to enrich our understanding of phone mobilization

    Open Access•M Abrajano, Taylor N Carlson et al.•ARTICLE•Electoral Studies•2020•Citada por: 3•Referencias: 19

  • Experimental Measurement of Misperception in Political Beliefs

    Open Access•Taylor N Carlson, Seth J Hill•ARTICLE•Journal of Experimental Political…•2021•Citada por: 8•Referencias: 9

    Recent research suggests widespread misperception about the political views of others. Measuring perceptions often relies on instruments that do not separate uncertainty from inaccuracy. We present new experimental measures of second-order political beliefs. To carefully measure political (mis)perceptions, we have subjects report beliefs as probabilities. To encourage accuracy, we provide micro-incentives for each response. To measure learning, w…

  • Not who you think? Exposure and vulnerability to misinformation

    Open Access•Nicolas M Anspach, Taylor N Carlson•ARTICLE•New Media & Society•2022•Citada por: 1•Referencias: 14

    Is exposure to false information necessary for misbelief? In this article, we consider the possibility that certain individuals hold misinformed beliefs without encountering misinformation, thus questioning for whom exposure to “fake news” is most deleterious. Using a pre-registered experiment on a diverse sample of 1079 US respondents, we find that the young, those with low information literacy, and those with high trust in government tend to ho…

  • Freedom of Expression in Interpersonal Interactions

    Open Access•Taylor N Carlson, Jaime E Settle•ARTICLE•PS Political Science & Politics•2023•Citada por: 3•Referencias: 15

    An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content

  • Cross-Partisan Conversation Reduced Affective Polarization for Republicans and Democrats Even after the Contentious 2020 Election

    Erin L Rossiter, Erin Rossiter et al.•ARTICLE•The Journal of Politics•2024•Citada por: 6•Referencias: 8

  • CueAnon

    Open Access•Benjamin S Noble, Taylor N Carlson•ARTICLE•Political Behavior•2025•Referencias: 39

  • Do Political Discussion Partners Share Policy Priorities and Policy Frames?

    Open Access•Matthew T Pietryka, Amber E Boydstun et al.•ARTICLE•Political Behavior•2026

    To understand politics, people often rely on political discussion. Among the many ways that discussion may shape political perceptions, one possible mechanism is by promoting a shared sense of priorities— which issues are important. A second mechanism is by framing how people think about important issues. We examine these potential mechanisms by answering the descriptive question: Do policy priorities and policy frames tend to co-occur within pol…

  • You’re Making Us Look Bad

    Open Access•Elizabeth C Connors, Taylor N Carlson et al.•ARTICLE•Public Opinion Quarterly•2026•Referencias: 53

    Partisan elites and members of the public often have attitudes or engage in behavior that could embarrass copartisans. We examine this occurrence—what we call partisan embarrassment—by investigating how much partisans report feeling this embarrassment, what types of scenarios embarrass partisans, what types of partisans feel this embarrassment, and what the political ramifications of partisan embarrassment could be. We expect that when a copartis…

Political science (14 obras) · Politics (12 obras) · Social Media and Politics (12 obras) · Psychology (10 obras) · Computer Science (9 obras) · Law (9 obras) · Electoral Systems and Political Participation (8 obras) · Law (8 obras) · Social Psychology (8 obras) · Social Psychology (7 obras)

Ethnos_APP • Proyecto Open Source • Licencia MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidad y Cookies • Documentación de la API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código de la API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código del Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae