Phillip Montague
Biographic Data
| ID | 1200177 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Phillip Montague |
| GIVEN NAMES | Phillip |
| FAMILY NAME | Montague |
| SIGNATURE | MONTAGUE P |
| AFFILIATIONS | Western Washington University |
| VERIFIED | No |
| TOTAL WORKS | 10 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 2 |
| WORKS AS AUTHOR | 10 |
| WORKS AS EDITOR | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 1969 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2009 |
| H-INDEX | 1 |
On the Ethics of War and Terrorism
Religious Reasons and Political Debate
Why Rule Consequentialism is not Superior to Ross-style Pluralism
The Myth of Parental Rights
L'A. refute la conception des droits parentaux selon laquelle les parents biologiques ont un droit moral sur l'existence de leur enfant. Revisant la nature de la relation parents/enfants et comparant les droits moraux aux droits en general, en reference aux notions de choix et d'autonomie, l'A. defend l'importance pratique des obligations parentales de soin, de protection et de bien-etre de l'enfant, contre l'importance theorique accordee aux dro…
Self-Defence and Innocence
Although people generally agree that innocent targets of culpable aggression are justified in harming the aggressors in self-defence, there is considerable disagreement regarding whether innocents are justified in defending themselves when their doing so would harm other innocent people. I argue in this essay that harming innocent aggressors and active innocent threats in self-defence is indeed justified under certain conditions, but that defensi…
Punishment as Societal Defense
In Defense of Moral Principles
If we believe that it is possible to know whether particular actions are right or wrong, and if we regard this knowledge as inferential, then it would seem that we must believe in general moral principles which validate the required inferences. This cluster of beliefs is notoriously problematic, of course, and its problems have been discussed at length by a number of philosophers. I doubt, however, that the real source of difficulty has been clea…
Comparative and Non-Comparative Justice
Journal Article Comparative and Non-Comparative Justice Get access Phillip Montague Phillip Montague Western Washington University Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar The Philosophical Quarterly, Volume 30, Issue 119, April 1980, Pages 131–140, https://doi.org/10.2307/2219277 Published: 01 April 1980
Justice, Reasonableness, and the Similar Handling of Similar Cases
In defense of aesthetic monism
Self-Defence and Innocence
Although people generally agree that innocent targets of culpable aggression are justified in harming the aggressors in self-defence, there is considerable disagreement regarding whether innocents are justified in defending themselves when their doing so would harm other innocent people. I argue in this essay that harming innocent aggressors and active innocent threats in self-defence is indeed justified under certain conditions, but that defensi…
Comparative and Non-Comparative Justice
Journal Article Comparative and Non-Comparative Justice Get access Phillip Montague Phillip Montague Western Washington University Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar The Philosophical Quarterly, Volume 30, Issue 119, April 1980, Pages 131–140, https://doi.org/10.2307/2219277 Published: 01 April 1980
In defense of aesthetic monism
Justice, Reasonableness, and the Similar Handling of Similar Cases
Comparative and Non-Comparative Justice
Journal Article Comparative and Non-Comparative Justice Get access Phillip Montague Phillip Montague Western Washington University Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar The Philosophical Quarterly, Volume 30, Issue 119, April 1980, Pages 131–140, https://doi.org/10.2307/2219277 Published: 01 April 1980
In Defense of Moral Principles
If we believe that it is possible to know whether particular actions are right or wrong, and if we regard this knowledge as inferential, then it would seem that we must believe in general moral principles which validate the required inferences. This cluster of beliefs is notoriously problematic, of course, and its problems have been discussed at length by a number of philosophers. I doubt, however, that the real source of difficulty has been clea…
Punishment as Societal Defense
Why Rule Consequentialism is not Superior to Ross-style Pluralism
The Myth of Parental Rights
L'A. refute la conception des droits parentaux selon laquelle les parents biologiques ont un droit moral sur l'existence de leur enfant. Revisant la nature de la relation parents/enfants et comparant les droits moraux aux droits en general, en reference aux notions de choix et d'autonomie, l'A. defend l'importance pratique des obligations parentales de soin, de protection et de bien-etre de l'enfant, contre l'importance theorique accordee aux dro…
Self-Defence and Innocence
Although people generally agree that innocent targets of culpable aggression are justified in harming the aggressors in self-defence, there is considerable disagreement regarding whether innocents are justified in defending themselves when their doing so would harm other innocent people. I argue in this essay that harming innocent aggressors and active innocent threats in self-defence is indeed justified under certain conditions, but that defensi…
Religious Reasons and Political Debate
On the Ethics of War and Terrorism
Sociology (8 works) · Philosophy (7 works) · Epistemology (6 works) · Political science (6 works) · Law (5 works) · Law and economics (4 works) · Political Philosophy and Ethics (4 works) · Psychology (4 works) · Contemporary philosophy (3 works) · Criminology (3 works)