Joseph F Kobylka
Biographic Data
| ID | 1204001 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Joseph F Kobylka |
| GIVEN NAMES | Joseph F |
| FAMILY NAME | Kobylka |
| SIGNATURE | KOBYLKA J F |
| AFFILIATIONS | Southern Methodist University |
| VERIFIED | No |
| TOTAL WORKS | 6 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 27 |
| AUTHOR COUNT | 6 |
| EDITOR COUNT | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 1987 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 1997 |
| H-INDEX | 3 |
Rethinking Abortion. Mark A. Graber
The Transformation of the Supreme Court's Agenda
The Dialogic Community
Some interpretations of James Madison tend to treat him as an enemy of “community,” or as indifferent to that concept. These interpretations also tend to base their argument on selected readings from the Federalist Papers . This approach is mistaken because it relies on a part of the Madisonian corpus to define the whole of the Virginian's thought. This mistake leads to a distortion of Madison's treatment of community. Close scrutiny of Madison's…
Leadership on the Supreme Court of the United States
A Court-Created Context for Group Litigation
Studies have shown that interest groups can and often do use litigation to advance their goals. However, the literature has not specifically examined how significant changes in the law affect this behavior. A longitudinal research design allows this question to be addressed, and obscenity provides an excellent case study. In Miller v. California (1973), the Burger Court reversed the Warren Court's liberalization of obscenity law. The reversal sti…
Madison, "The Federalist", & the Constitutional Order
Interpretations of James Madison have tended to ignore his complex conception of human nature and how it colors his understanding of the plan for the Constitution. This article argues that Madison did not see human nature as either unstintingly Hobbesian or unambiguously virtuous, but rather as containing elements of both. Madison builds "auxiliary precautions" into the American system as defenses against the dark side of human nature, but at the…
A Court-Created Context for Group Litigation
Studies have shown that interest groups can and often do use litigation to advance their goals. However, the literature has not specifically examined how significant changes in the law affect this behavior. A longitudinal research design allows this question to be addressed, and obscenity provides an excellent case study. In Miller v. California (1973), the Burger Court reversed the Warren Court's liberalization of obscenity law. The reversal sti…
Leadership on the Supreme Court of the United States
Madison, "The Federalist", & the Constitutional Order
Interpretations of James Madison have tended to ignore his complex conception of human nature and how it colors his understanding of the plan for the Constitution. This article argues that Madison did not see human nature as either unstintingly Hobbesian or unambiguously virtuous, but rather as containing elements of both. Madison builds "auxiliary precautions" into the American system as defenses against the dark side of human nature, but at the…
A Court-Created Context for Group Litigation
Studies have shown that interest groups can and often do use litigation to advance their goals. However, the literature has not specifically examined how significant changes in the law affect this behavior. A longitudinal research design allows this question to be addressed, and obscenity provides an excellent case study. In Miller v. California (1973), the Burger Court reversed the Warren Court's liberalization of obscenity law. The reversal sti…
Madison, "The Federalist", & the Constitutional Order
Interpretations of James Madison have tended to ignore his complex conception of human nature and how it colors his understanding of the plan for the Constitution. This article argues that Madison did not see human nature as either unstintingly Hobbesian or unambiguously virtuous, but rather as containing elements of both. Madison builds "auxiliary precautions" into the American system as defenses against the dark side of human nature, but at the…
Leadership on the Supreme Court of the United States
The Dialogic Community
Some interpretations of James Madison tend to treat him as an enemy of “community,” or as indifferent to that concept. These interpretations also tend to base their argument on selected readings from the Federalist Papers . This approach is mistaken because it relies on a part of the Madisonian corpus to define the whole of the Virginian's thought. This mistake leads to a distortion of Madison's treatment of community. Close scrutiny of Madison's…
The Transformation of the Supreme Court's Agenda
Rethinking Abortion. Mark A. Graber
Law (6 works) · Political science (6 works) · American Constitutional Law and Politics (5 works) · Law (5 works) · Law and economics (3 works) · Politics (3 works) · Sociology (3 works) · Federalist (2 works) · Law, Rights, and Freedoms (2 works) · Political Theory and Influence (2 works)