Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Douglas G Morris

Biographic Data

ID1208932
NAMEDouglas G Morris
GIVEN NAMESDouglas G
FAMILY NAMEMorris
SIGNATUREMORRIS D G
AFFILIATIONSFilm Independent
VERIFIEDNo
TOTAL WORKS7
TOTAL CITATIONS3
AUTHOR COUNT7
EDITOR COUNT0
FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR1980
LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR2022
H-INDEX1
  • Willkürherrschaft und nazifiziertes Recht als die Ursprünge des nationalsozialistischen Doppelstaates

    Douglas G Morris•ARTICLE•Journal der Juristischen…•2022

    Article Willkürherrschaft und nazifiziertes Recht als die Ursprünge des nationalsozialistischen Doppelstaates was published on March 1, 2022 in the journal Journal der Juristischen Zeitgeschichte (volume 16, issue 1)

  • Fritz Bauer

    Open Access•Douglas G Morris•ARTICLE•Holocaust and Genocide Studies•2022

  • Legal Sabotage

    Open Access•Douglas G Morris, Douglas Morris•BOOK•Legal Sabotage•2020

    The Jewish leftist lawyer Ernst Fraenkel was one of twentieth-century Germany's great intellectuals. During the Weimar Republic he was a shrewd constitutional theorist for the Social Democrats and in post-World War II Germany a respected political scientist who worked to secure West Germany's new democracy. This book homes in on the most dramatic years of Fraenkel's life, when he worked within Nazi Germany actively resisting the regime, both publ…

  • Accommodating Nazi Tyranny? The Wrong Turn of the Social Democratic Legal Philosopher Gustav Radbruch After the War

    Open Access•Douglas G Morris•ARTICLE•Law and History Review•2016•Cited by: 2•References: 2

    What is the relationship between Nazism and natural law—the notion of universal standards, which arise from either God, revelation, nature, rationality, or morality, and which human-made statutes cannot break? In 1946, in the wake of World War II, Gustav Radbruch, one of Germany's most respected Social Democrats and legal philosophers, published his influential article, “Statutory Injustice and Suprastatutory Law,” which grappled with a pressing …

  • The Lawyer Who Mocked Hitler, and Other Jewish Commentaries on the Nuremberg Laws

    Open Access•Douglas G Morris•ARTICLE•Central European History•2016•Cited by: 1•References: 15

    Nazi Germany’s Nuremberg Laws of 1935 generated legal commentary by Nazi jurists who eagerly extended its antisemitic principles—but not by Jewish lawyers, for whom the discrimination was too blatant and the risks of public criticism too dangerous. In the winter of 1936-37 in Leipzig, however, one obscure lawyer named Max Hellmann made an incisive commentary about the laws. Faced with prosecution for employing a female “Aryan” cook, Hellmann, a c…

  • Write and Resist

    Douglas G Morris•ARTICLE•New German Critique•2015

    The advent of the Nazi regime challenged the thinking of the Jewish Social Democrats Ernst Fraenkel and Franz Neumann. Law partners and intellectual companions in the Weimar Republic, they anguished about how to resist the new regime and justify that resistance. Nothing foretold that they would think about anti-Nazi resistance in terms of natural law, with its largely religious underpinnings and often reactionary uses. But despite their new and c…

  • Jung

    Douglas G Morris, Vincent Brome•ARTICLE•The Journal of Interdisciplinary…•1980

  • Accommodating Nazi Tyranny? The Wrong Turn of the Social Democratic Legal Philosopher Gustav Radbruch After the War

    Open Access•Douglas G Morris•ARTICLE•Law and History Review•2016•Cited by: 2•References: 2

    What is the relationship between Nazism and natural law—the notion of universal standards, which arise from either God, revelation, nature, rationality, or morality, and which human-made statutes cannot break? In 1946, in the wake of World War II, Gustav Radbruch, one of Germany's most respected Social Democrats and legal philosophers, published his influential article, “Statutory Injustice and Suprastatutory Law,” which grappled with a pressing …

  • The Lawyer Who Mocked Hitler, and Other Jewish Commentaries on the Nuremberg Laws

    Open Access•Douglas G Morris•ARTICLE•Central European History•2016•Cited by: 1•References: 15

    Nazi Germany’s Nuremberg Laws of 1935 generated legal commentary by Nazi jurists who eagerly extended its antisemitic principles—but not by Jewish lawyers, for whom the discrimination was too blatant and the risks of public criticism too dangerous. In the winter of 1936-37 in Leipzig, however, one obscure lawyer named Max Hellmann made an incisive commentary about the laws. Faced with prosecution for employing a female “Aryan” cook, Hellmann, a c…

  • Jung

    Douglas G Morris, Vincent Brome•ARTICLE•The Journal of Interdisciplinary…•1980

  • Write and Resist

    Douglas G Morris•ARTICLE•New German Critique•2015

    The advent of the Nazi regime challenged the thinking of the Jewish Social Democrats Ernst Fraenkel and Franz Neumann. Law partners and intellectual companions in the Weimar Republic, they anguished about how to resist the new regime and justify that resistance. Nothing foretold that they would think about anti-Nazi resistance in terms of natural law, with its largely religious underpinnings and often reactionary uses. But despite their new and c…

  • Accommodating Nazi Tyranny? The Wrong Turn of the Social Democratic Legal Philosopher Gustav Radbruch After the War

    Open Access•Douglas G Morris•ARTICLE•Law and History Review•2016•Cited by: 2•References: 2

    What is the relationship between Nazism and natural law—the notion of universal standards, which arise from either God, revelation, nature, rationality, or morality, and which human-made statutes cannot break? In 1946, in the wake of World War II, Gustav Radbruch, one of Germany's most respected Social Democrats and legal philosophers, published his influential article, “Statutory Injustice and Suprastatutory Law,” which grappled with a pressing …

  • The Lawyer Who Mocked Hitler, and Other Jewish Commentaries on the Nuremberg Laws

    Open Access•Douglas G Morris•ARTICLE•Central European History•2016•Cited by: 1•References: 15

    Nazi Germany’s Nuremberg Laws of 1935 generated legal commentary by Nazi jurists who eagerly extended its antisemitic principles—but not by Jewish lawyers, for whom the discrimination was too blatant and the risks of public criticism too dangerous. In the winter of 1936-37 in Leipzig, however, one obscure lawyer named Max Hellmann made an incisive commentary about the laws. Faced with prosecution for employing a female “Aryan” cook, Hellmann, a c…

  • Legal Sabotage

    Open Access•Douglas G Morris, Douglas Morris•BOOK•Legal Sabotage•2020

    The Jewish leftist lawyer Ernst Fraenkel was one of twentieth-century Germany's great intellectuals. During the Weimar Republic he was a shrewd constitutional theorist for the Social Democrats and in post-World War II Germany a respected political scientist who worked to secure West Germany's new democracy. This book homes in on the most dramatic years of Fraenkel's life, when he worked within Nazi Germany actively resisting the regime, both publ…

  • Willkürherrschaft und nazifiziertes Recht als die Ursprünge des nationalsozialistischen Doppelstaates

    Douglas G Morris•ARTICLE•Journal der Juristischen…•2022

    Article Willkürherrschaft und nazifiziertes Recht als die Ursprünge des nationalsozialistischen Doppelstaates was published on March 1, 2022 in the journal Journal der Juristischen Zeitgeschichte (volume 16, issue 1)

  • Fritz Bauer

    Open Access•Douglas G Morris•ARTICLE•Holocaust and Genocide Studies•2022

Political science (6 works) · Nazism (5 works) · European history and politics (4 works) · Law (4 works) · Politics (4 works) · Law (3 works) · Philosophy (3 works) · Theology (3 works) · Hannah Arendt's Political Philosophy (2 works) · Judaism (2 works)

Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae