Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

David Runciman

Biographic Data

ID1212209
NAMEDavid Runciman
GIVEN NAMESDavid
FAMILY NAMERunciman
SIGNATURERUNCIMAN D
AFFILIATIONSUniversity of Cambridge
VERIFIEDNo
TOTAL WORKS25
TOTAL CITATIONS107
WORKS AS AUTHOR25
WORKS AS EDITOR0
FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR1997
LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR2018
H-INDEX6
  • Political Hypocrisy

    David Runciman•BOOK•Political Hypocrisy•2018

  • Political Hypocrisy

    David Runciman•BOOK•Political Hypocrisy•2018

    What kind of hypocrite should voters choose as their next leader? The question seems utterly cynical. But, as David Runciman suggests, it is actually much more cynical to pretend that politics can ever be completely sincere. Political Hypocrisy is a timely, and timeless, book on the problems of sincerity and truth in politics, and how we can deal with them without slipping into hypocrisy ourselves. Runciman draws on the work of some of the great …

  • Political Hypocrisy

    David Runciman•BOOK•Political Hypocrisy•2018

  • The Confidence Trap

    Open Access•David Runciman•BOOK•Confidence Trap•2018

    Why democracies believe they can survive any crisis—and why that belief is so dangerous Why do democracies keep lurching from success to failure? The current financial crisis is just the latest example of how things continue to go wrong, just when it looked like they were going right. In this wide-ranging, original, and compelling book, David Runciman tells the story of modern democracy through the history of moments of crisis, from the First Wor…

  • Why is Democracy so Surprising

    Open Access•David Runciman•ARTICLE•The Political Quarterly•2018•Cited by: 1

  • Bishop Bartholomew of Exeter (d. 1184) and the Heresy of Astrology

    Open Access•David Runciman•ARTICLE•The Journal of Ecclesiastical…•2018•References: 6

    In the late twelfth century, Bartholomew, bishop of Exeter (1161–84), identified astrology as the most serious heresy facing the English Church. The evidence of Bartholomew's writing suggests that astrology became more widely accepted among the English clergy during his episcopal tenure. It also supports the view that popular heretical movements enjoyed little success in England during this period, in contrast to some regions in mainland Europe. …

  • Political Hypocrisy

    David Runciman•BOOK•Political Hypocrisy•2018

  • Electoral Reform and the Constitution

    David Runciman•CHAPTER•Constitution in crisis•2017

  • Political Theory and Real Politics in the Age of the Internet

    Open Access•David Runciman•ARTICLE•Journal of Political Philosophy•2016•Cited by: 7

  • Rescuing Democracy in the Age of the Internet

    Open Access•David Runciman•ARTICLE•Ethics & International Affairs•2015

    Throughout almost the entire history of democracy—from pre-Socratic Greece up to the second half of the twentieth century—its champions faced little difficulty in identifying its enemies. Critics of democracy consistently lined up to attack it on ideological and philosophical grounds. The litany of complaints was familiar: Democracy is an ignorant, unreliable, unstable form of rule; putting power in the hands of the people entrusts decision-makin…

  • What Is Realistic Political Philosophy?

    Open Access•David Runciman•ARTICLE•Metaphilosophy•2012

    In the study of politics, C ambridge is sometimes associated with a school of political philosophical “realism.” This article discusses what realism in political philosophy might mean, by examining first what might count as “unrealistic” political philosophy (looking at S idgwick and R awls), and then some recent attempts to identify a more realistic philosophical approach to politics. It argues that realistic political philosophy tends to emerge…

  • A theoretical overview

    Open Access•David Runciman•CHAPTER•Families and States in Western…•2011

    What stands between families and states? The conventional answer of modern political theory is civil society: the sphere of voluntary associations and relationships that provides individuals with a means of escape from both the confines of family life and the rigours of state politics. This can be either a descriptive or a normative claim. One of the distinguishing features of modern societies is the sheer scale and variety of civil associations …

  • Can Democracy Cope

    Open Access•David Runciman•ARTICLE•The Political Quarterly•2011•Cited by: 1

    The success story of democracy over the twentieth century has given way to doubts in the twenty‐first, as democracies struggle to cope with difficult wars, mounting debts, climate change and the rise of China. This essay uses intellectual history to explain the link between long‐term democratic success and short‐term democratic failure. It distinguishes three distinct views of what can go wrong with democracy, and identifies the third (which I ca…

  • Political Representation

    Open Access•David Runciman, Mark Knights et al.•BOOK•Political Representation•2010

    Political representation lies at the core of modern politics. Democracies, with their vast numbers of citizens, could not operate without representative institutions. Yet relations between the democratic ideal and the everyday practice of political representation have never been well defined and remain the subject of vigorous debate among historians, political theorists, lawyers, and citizens. In this volume, an eminent group of scholars move for…

  • The Politics of Good Intentions

    David Runciman•BOOK•Politics of Good Intentions•2009

  • Political Hypocrisy

    David Runciman•BOOK•Political Hypocrisy•2009

    What kind of hypocrite should voters choose as their next leader? The question seems utterly cynical. But, as David Runciman suggests, it is actually much more cynical to pretend that politics can ever be completely sincere. The most dangerous form of political hypocrisy is to claim to have a politics without hypocrisy. Political Hypocrisy is a timely, and timeless, book on the problems of sincerity and truth in politics, and how we can deal with…

  • The Paradox of Political Representation

    Open Access•David Runciman•ARTICLE•Journal of Political Philosophy•2007•Cited by: 51•References: 3

  • Sovereign Debt and Private Creditors

    Helen Thompson, David Runciman•ARTICLE•New Political Economy•2006

  • The Practice of Liberal Pluralism

    Open Access•David Runciman•REVIEW•Perspectives on Politics•2006

    The Practice of Liberal Pluralism. By William A. Galston. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2004. 216p. $65.00 cloth, $26.99 paper. This book seeks to defend the idea of value pluralism set out in William Galston's earlier Liberal Pluralism (2002) against the various criticisms to which it has been subjected, and to explain the ways that this kind of pluralism can be given practical political application. The first of these tasks is efficient…

  • Legitimating Identities. The Self-presentations of Rulers and Subjects

    Open Access•David Runciman•ARTICLE•Contemporary Political Theory•2003•Cited by: 6

  • History of Political Thought

    Open Access•David Runciman•ARTICLE•The British Journal of Politics…•2001•Cited by: 10•References: 5

  • What Kind of Person is Hobbes’s State? A Reply to Skinner

    Open Access•David Runciman•ARTICLE•Journal of Political Philosophy•2000•Cited by: 24

  • Is the State a Corporation

    Open Access•David Runciman•ARTICLE•Government and Opposition•2000•Cited by: 7•References: 1

    THE PURPOSE OF THIS ARTICLE IS TO ESTABLISH THE RELEVANCE OF the question that forms its title for contemporary political theory. It is not an obvious question, both because it is not obvious what the answer is, but also because it is not obvious what it means in contemporary terms. In order to establish its significance, it is necessary first of all to establish what the question does mean, and what the term ‘corporation’ means within it. It is,…

  • Personality and Public Law Doctrine

    Janet McLean, David Runciman•ARTICLE•University of Toronto Law Journal•1999

  • Pluralism and the Personality of the State

    Open Access•David Runciman•BOOK•Pluralism and the Personality of…•1997

    Set against the broad context of philosophical arguments about group and state personality, Pluralism and the Personality of the State tells, for the first time, the history of political pluralism. The pluralists believed that the state was simply one group among many, and could not therefore be sovereign. They also believed that groups, like individuals, might have personalities of their own. The book examines the philosophical background to pol…

  • The Paradox of Political Representation

    Open Access•David Runciman•ARTICLE•Journal of Political Philosophy•2007•Cited by: 51•References: 3

  • What Kind of Person is Hobbes’s State? A Reply to Skinner

    Open Access•David Runciman•ARTICLE•Journal of Political Philosophy•2000•Cited by: 24

  • History of Political Thought

    Open Access•David Runciman•ARTICLE•The British Journal of Politics…•2001•Cited by: 10•References: 5

  • Political Theory and Real Politics in the Age of the Internet

    Open Access•David Runciman•ARTICLE•Journal of Political Philosophy•2016•Cited by: 7

  • Is the State a Corporation

    Open Access•David Runciman•ARTICLE•Government and Opposition•2000•Cited by: 7•References: 1

    THE PURPOSE OF THIS ARTICLE IS TO ESTABLISH THE RELEVANCE OF the question that forms its title for contemporary political theory. It is not an obvious question, both because it is not obvious what the answer is, but also because it is not obvious what it means in contemporary terms. In order to establish its significance, it is necessary first of all to establish what the question does mean, and what the term ‘corporation’ means within it. It is,…

  • Legitimating Identities. The Self-presentations of Rulers and Subjects

    Open Access•David Runciman•ARTICLE•Contemporary Political Theory•2003•Cited by: 6

  • Why is Democracy so Surprising

    Open Access•David Runciman•ARTICLE•The Political Quarterly•2018•Cited by: 1

  • Can Democracy Cope

    Open Access•David Runciman•ARTICLE•The Political Quarterly•2011•Cited by: 1

    The success story of democracy over the twentieth century has given way to doubts in the twenty‐first, as democracies struggle to cope with difficult wars, mounting debts, climate change and the rise of China. This essay uses intellectual history to explain the link between long‐term democratic success and short‐term democratic failure. It distinguishes three distinct views of what can go wrong with democracy, and identifies the third (which I ca…

  • Pluralism and the Personality of the State

    Open Access•David Runciman•BOOK•Pluralism and the Personality of…•1997

    Set against the broad context of philosophical arguments about group and state personality, Pluralism and the Personality of the State tells, for the first time, the history of political pluralism. The pluralists believed that the state was simply one group among many, and could not therefore be sovereign. They also believed that groups, like individuals, might have personalities of their own. The book examines the philosophical background to pol…

  • Personality and Public Law Doctrine

    Janet McLean, David Runciman•ARTICLE•University of Toronto Law Journal•1999

  • What Kind of Person is Hobbes’s State? A Reply to Skinner

    Open Access•David Runciman•ARTICLE•Journal of Political Philosophy•2000•Cited by: 24

  • Is the State a Corporation

    Open Access•David Runciman•ARTICLE•Government and Opposition•2000•Cited by: 7•References: 1

    THE PURPOSE OF THIS ARTICLE IS TO ESTABLISH THE RELEVANCE OF the question that forms its title for contemporary political theory. It is not an obvious question, both because it is not obvious what the answer is, but also because it is not obvious what it means in contemporary terms. In order to establish its significance, it is necessary first of all to establish what the question does mean, and what the term ‘corporation’ means within it. It is,…

  • History of Political Thought

    Open Access•David Runciman•ARTICLE•The British Journal of Politics…•2001•Cited by: 10•References: 5

  • Legitimating Identities. The Self-presentations of Rulers and Subjects

    Open Access•David Runciman•ARTICLE•Contemporary Political Theory•2003•Cited by: 6

  • Sovereign Debt and Private Creditors

    Helen Thompson, David Runciman•ARTICLE•New Political Economy•2006

  • The Practice of Liberal Pluralism

    Open Access•David Runciman•REVIEW•Perspectives on Politics•2006

    The Practice of Liberal Pluralism. By William A. Galston. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2004. 216p. $65.00 cloth, $26.99 paper. This book seeks to defend the idea of value pluralism set out in William Galston's earlier Liberal Pluralism (2002) against the various criticisms to which it has been subjected, and to explain the ways that this kind of pluralism can be given practical political application. The first of these tasks is efficient…

  • The Paradox of Political Representation

    Open Access•David Runciman•ARTICLE•Journal of Political Philosophy•2007•Cited by: 51•References: 3

  • The Politics of Good Intentions

    David Runciman•BOOK•Politics of Good Intentions•2009

  • Political Hypocrisy

    David Runciman•BOOK•Political Hypocrisy•2009

    What kind of hypocrite should voters choose as their next leader? The question seems utterly cynical. But, as David Runciman suggests, it is actually much more cynical to pretend that politics can ever be completely sincere. The most dangerous form of political hypocrisy is to claim to have a politics without hypocrisy. Political Hypocrisy is a timely, and timeless, book on the problems of sincerity and truth in politics, and how we can deal with…

  • Political Representation

    Open Access•David Runciman, Mark Knights et al.•BOOK•Political Representation•2010

    Political representation lies at the core of modern politics. Democracies, with their vast numbers of citizens, could not operate without representative institutions. Yet relations between the democratic ideal and the everyday practice of political representation have never been well defined and remain the subject of vigorous debate among historians, political theorists, lawyers, and citizens. In this volume, an eminent group of scholars move for…

  • A theoretical overview

    Open Access•David Runciman•CHAPTER•Families and States in Western…•2011

    What stands between families and states? The conventional answer of modern political theory is civil society: the sphere of voluntary associations and relationships that provides individuals with a means of escape from both the confines of family life and the rigours of state politics. This can be either a descriptive or a normative claim. One of the distinguishing features of modern societies is the sheer scale and variety of civil associations …

  • Can Democracy Cope

    Open Access•David Runciman•ARTICLE•The Political Quarterly•2011•Cited by: 1

    The success story of democracy over the twentieth century has given way to doubts in the twenty‐first, as democracies struggle to cope with difficult wars, mounting debts, climate change and the rise of China. This essay uses intellectual history to explain the link between long‐term democratic success and short‐term democratic failure. It distinguishes three distinct views of what can go wrong with democracy, and identifies the third (which I ca…

  • What Is Realistic Political Philosophy?

    Open Access•David Runciman•ARTICLE•Metaphilosophy•2012

    In the study of politics, C ambridge is sometimes associated with a school of political philosophical “realism.” This article discusses what realism in political philosophy might mean, by examining first what might count as “unrealistic” political philosophy (looking at S idgwick and R awls), and then some recent attempts to identify a more realistic philosophical approach to politics. It argues that realistic political philosophy tends to emerge…

  • Rescuing Democracy in the Age of the Internet

    Open Access•David Runciman•ARTICLE•Ethics & International Affairs•2015

    Throughout almost the entire history of democracy—from pre-Socratic Greece up to the second half of the twentieth century—its champions faced little difficulty in identifying its enemies. Critics of democracy consistently lined up to attack it on ideological and philosophical grounds. The litany of complaints was familiar: Democracy is an ignorant, unreliable, unstable form of rule; putting power in the hands of the people entrusts decision-makin…

  • Political Theory and Real Politics in the Age of the Internet

    Open Access•David Runciman•ARTICLE•Journal of Political Philosophy•2016•Cited by: 7

  • Electoral Reform and the Constitution

    David Runciman•CHAPTER•Constitution in crisis•2017

  • Political Hypocrisy

    David Runciman•BOOK•Political Hypocrisy•2018

  • Political Hypocrisy

    David Runciman•BOOK•Political Hypocrisy•2018

    What kind of hypocrite should voters choose as their next leader? The question seems utterly cynical. But, as David Runciman suggests, it is actually much more cynical to pretend that politics can ever be completely sincere. Political Hypocrisy is a timely, and timeless, book on the problems of sincerity and truth in politics, and how we can deal with them without slipping into hypocrisy ourselves. Runciman draws on the work of some of the great …

  • Political Hypocrisy

    David Runciman•BOOK•Political Hypocrisy•2018

  • The Confidence Trap

    Open Access•David Runciman•BOOK•Confidence Trap•2018

    Why democracies believe they can survive any crisis—and why that belief is so dangerous Why do democracies keep lurching from success to failure? The current financial crisis is just the latest example of how things continue to go wrong, just when it looked like they were going right. In this wide-ranging, original, and compelling book, David Runciman tells the story of modern democracy through the history of moments of crisis, from the First Wor…

  • Why is Democracy so Surprising

    Open Access•David Runciman•ARTICLE•The Political Quarterly•2018•Cited by: 1

  • Bishop Bartholomew of Exeter (d. 1184) and the Heresy of Astrology

    Open Access•David Runciman•ARTICLE•The Journal of Ecclesiastical…•2018•References: 6

    In the late twelfth century, Bartholomew, bishop of Exeter (1161–84), identified astrology as the most serious heresy facing the English Church. The evidence of Bartholomew's writing suggests that astrology became more widely accepted among the English clergy during his episcopal tenure. It also supports the view that popular heretical movements enjoyed little success in England during this period, in contrast to some regions in mainland Europe. …

  • Political Hypocrisy

    David Runciman•BOOK•Political Hypocrisy•2018

Political science (21 works) · Law (20 works) · Politics (18 works) · Sociology (14 works) · Law (12 works) · Political Philosophy and Ethics (11 works) · Computer Science (9 works) · Philosophy (8 works) · Epistemology (7 works) · Philosophy (6 works)

Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae