Sindre Olaussen Søderstrøm
Biographic Data
| ID | 1213660 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Sindre Olaussen Søderstrøm |
| GIVEN NAMES | Sindre Olaussen |
| FAMILY NAME | Søderstrøm |
| SIGNATURE | SØDERSTRØM S O |
| AFFILIATIONS | University of Bergen |
| ORCID | 0000-0002-2394-2426 |
| VERIFIED | Yes |
| TOTAL WORKS | 2 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 0 |
| AUTHOR COUNT | 2 |
| EDITOR COUNT | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2025 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2026 |
| H-INDEX | 0 |
Reasoning as Endorsement
This paper identifies when a process of belief revision qualifies as theoretical reasoning. Starting from the idea that reasoning should be understood via its epistemological role, it presents a novel account whereby what turns a process of belief revision into reasoning is how it is endorsed . This enables us to solve many of the central difficulties connected to creating a theory of reasoning, as well as to account for how different types of th…
Wittgenstein on the Grammar of Unshakeable Religious Beliefs
The paper offers a reinterpretation of Wittgenstein's 1938 lecture on religious belief and challenges a prominent view that it commits Wittgenstein to a form of non-cognitivism and/or that it reflects a lack of understanding of religious practices. It further argues that the lecture is not in tension with Wittgenstein's later views on the nature of philosophy
No prominent works on this page.
Wittgenstein on the Grammar of Unshakeable Religious Beliefs
The paper offers a reinterpretation of Wittgenstein's 1938 lecture on religious belief and challenges a prominent view that it commits Wittgenstein to a form of non-cognitivism and/or that it reflects a lack of understanding of religious practices. It further argues that the lecture is not in tension with Wittgenstein's later views on the nature of philosophy
Reasoning as Endorsement
This paper identifies when a process of belief revision qualifies as theoretical reasoning. Starting from the idea that reasoning should be understood via its epistemological role, it presents a novel account whereby what turns a process of belief revision into reasoning is how it is endorsed . This enables us to solve many of the central difficulties connected to creating a theory of reasoning, as well as to account for how different types of th…
Analytic reasoning (1 works) · Belief revision (1 works) · Case-based reasoning (1 works) · Deductive reasoning (1 works) · Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (1 works) · Grammar (1 works) · Linguistics (1 works) · Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge (1 works) · Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation (1 works) · Non-monotonic logic (1 works)