Carl Baar
Biographic Data
| ID | 1235990 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Carl Baar |
| GIVEN NAMES | Carl |
| FAMILY NAME | Baar |
| SIGNATURE | BAAR C |
| AFFILIATIONS | Brock University |
| VERIFIED | No |
| TOTAL WORKS | 6 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 6 |
| AUTHOR COUNT | 6 |
| EDITOR COUNT | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 1977 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 1999 |
| H-INDEX | 1 |
Integrated justice
Growing interest in using automation to link components of the justice system has led four provincial governments to consider private‐sector partnerships in which the upfront cost of automation initiatives is borne by a private contractor who is compensated out of a benefit pool of future savings and revenue. Integrated justice systems thus reverse the standard approach to alternative service delivery, since broadly defined development work is pr…
Law, courts and democracy in Canada
Social Action Litigation in India
Using Process Theory to Explain Judicial Decision Making
This article is part of an effort to place current research on the Canadian judicial process into a broader theoretical context. This effort developed first from a sense that the legal and behavioural frameworks that have dominated the explanation of judicial decision making in the United States Supreme Court obscure more than they illuminate about judicial decision making in Canada; and second from the realization that the most illuminating Amer…
Alternative Models for Organization of State Court Systems
The dominant theme in court reorganization has been to state judiciaries by consolidating trial courts and centralizing their administration in a state level office. This article suggests that the debate over the relative merits of a centralized vs. a decentralized (or fragmented) court system ignores the rich variety of organizational structures used in other fields. The potential judicial implications of three models‐franchise, corporate, and f…
Patterns and strategies of court administration in Canada and the United States
This paper argues that patterns of court administration and the strategies pursued by judiciaries in Canada and the United States are quite different as a result of contrasting constitutional principles. Parliamentary supremacy in Canada has led to executive department administration of the courts, while the American separation of powers doctrine has encouraged judicial branch administration of the courts. Constitutional differences have also pro…
Social Action Litigation in India
Law, courts and democracy in Canada
Alternative Models for Organization of State Court Systems
The dominant theme in court reorganization has been to state judiciaries by consolidating trial courts and centralizing their administration in a state level office. This article suggests that the debate over the relative merits of a centralized vs. a decentralized (or fragmented) court system ignores the rich variety of organizational structures used in other fields. The potential judicial implications of three models‐franchise, corporate, and f…
Patterns and strategies of court administration in Canada and the United States
This paper argues that patterns of court administration and the strategies pursued by judiciaries in Canada and the United States are quite different as a result of contrasting constitutional principles. Parliamentary supremacy in Canada has led to executive department administration of the courts, while the American separation of powers doctrine has encouraged judicial branch administration of the courts. Constitutional differences have also pro…
Alternative Models for Organization of State Court Systems
The dominant theme in court reorganization has been to state judiciaries by consolidating trial courts and centralizing their administration in a state level office. This article suggests that the debate over the relative merits of a centralized vs. a decentralized (or fragmented) court system ignores the rich variety of organizational structures used in other fields. The potential judicial implications of three models‐franchise, corporate, and f…
Using Process Theory to Explain Judicial Decision Making
This article is part of an effort to place current research on the Canadian judicial process into a broader theoretical context. This effort developed first from a sense that the legal and behavioural frameworks that have dominated the explanation of judicial decision making in the United States Supreme Court obscure more than they illuminate about judicial decision making in Canada; and second from the realization that the most illuminating Amer…
Social Action Litigation in India
Law, courts and democracy in Canada
Integrated justice
Growing interest in using automation to link components of the justice system has led four provincial governments to consider private‐sector partnerships in which the upfront cost of automation initiatives is borne by a private contractor who is compensated out of a benefit pool of future savings and revenue. Integrated justice systems thus reverse the standard approach to alternative service delivery, since broadly defined development work is pr…
Political science (6 works) · Law (5 works) · Law (4 works) · Judicial and Constitutional Studies (3 works) · Law and economics (3 works) · Sociology (3 works) · Administration (probate law (2 works) · Computer Science (2 works) · Humanities (2 works) · Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems (2 works)