John A Barker
Biographic Data
| ID | 1242026 |
|---|---|
| NAME | John A Barker |
| GIVEN NAMES | John A |
| FAMILY NAME | Barker |
| SIGNATURE | BARKER J A |
| AFFILIATIONS | Southern Illinois University Edwardsville |
| ORCID | 0000-0002-7802-9765 |
| VERIFIED | Yes |
| TOTAL WORKS | 8 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 10 |
| WORKS AS AUTHOR | 8 |
| WORKS AS EDITOR | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 1973 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2014 |
| H-INDEX | 2 |
Satan, Saint Peter and Saint Petersburg
Towards closure on closure
Indicative Conditionals
Preview this article: Indicative Conditionals, Page 1 of 1 /docserver/preview/fulltext/sl.3.2.03bar-1.gif
The Nature of Question-Begging Arguments
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content
The Fallacy of Begging the Question
Begging the question - roughly, positing in the premises what is to be proved in the conclusion - is a perplexing fallacy.1 Are not question-begging arguments valid? Yes, we may find ourselves saying, but they are fallacious despite their validity, owing to their inability to establish the truth of a conclusion which is not already known. But are not question-begging arguments sometimes effective in bringing an audience to an awareness of the tru…
Brand and Swain on causation
Paradox without knowledge
Hypotheticals
Journal Article Hypotheticals: Conditionals and Theticals Get access John A. Barker John A. Barker Southern Illinois University at Edwardsville Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar The Philosophical Quarterly, Volume 23, Issue 93, October 1973, Pages 335–345, https://doi.org/10.2307/2218061 Published: 01 October 1973
Towards closure on closure
The Fallacy of Begging the Question
Begging the question - roughly, positing in the premises what is to be proved in the conclusion - is a perplexing fallacy.1 Are not question-begging arguments valid? Yes, we may find ourselves saying, but they are fallacious despite their validity, owing to their inability to establish the truth of a conclusion which is not already known. But are not question-begging arguments sometimes effective in bringing an audience to an awareness of the tru…
Satan, Saint Peter and Saint Petersburg
The Nature of Question-Begging Arguments
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content
Hypotheticals
Journal Article Hypotheticals: Conditionals and Theticals Get access John A. Barker John A. Barker Southern Illinois University at Edwardsville Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar The Philosophical Quarterly, Volume 23, Issue 93, October 1973, Pages 335–345, https://doi.org/10.2307/2218061 Published: 01 October 1973
Hypotheticals
Journal Article Hypotheticals: Conditionals and Theticals Get access John A. Barker John A. Barker Southern Illinois University at Edwardsville Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar The Philosophical Quarterly, Volume 23, Issue 93, October 1973, Pages 335–345, https://doi.org/10.2307/2218061 Published: 01 October 1973
Brand and Swain on causation
Paradox without knowledge
The Fallacy of Begging the Question
Begging the question - roughly, positing in the premises what is to be proved in the conclusion - is a perplexing fallacy.1 Are not question-begging arguments valid? Yes, we may find ourselves saying, but they are fallacious despite their validity, owing to their inability to establish the truth of a conclusion which is not already known. But are not question-begging arguments sometimes effective in bringing an audience to an awareness of the tru…
The Nature of Question-Begging Arguments
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content
Indicative Conditionals
Preview this article: Indicative Conditionals, Page 1 of 1 /docserver/preview/fulltext/sl.3.2.03bar-1.gif
Towards closure on closure
Satan, Saint Peter and Saint Petersburg
Philosophy (7 works) · Epistemology (6 works) · Metaphysics (4 works) · Philosophy and History of Science (4 works) · Philosophy of language (4 works) · Philosophy of science (4 works) · Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (3 works) · Law (3 works) · Philosophy and Theoretical Science (3 works) · Political science (3 works)