R J Lilford
Biographic Data
| ID | 1266256 |
|---|---|
| NAME | R J Lilford |
| GIVEN NAMES | R J |
| FAMILY NAME | Lilford |
| SIGNATURE | LILFORD R J |
| AFFILIATIONS | University of Birmingham |
| VERIFIED | No |
| TOTAL WORKS | 4 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 4 |
| AUTHOR COUNT | 4 |
| EDITOR COUNT | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 1998 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2015 |
| H-INDEX | 1 |
The stepped wedge cluster randomised trial
The stepped wedge cluster randomised controlled trial is a relatively new study design that is increasing in popularity. It is an alternative to parallel cluster trial designs, which are commonly used for the evaluation of service delivery or policy interventions delivered at the level of the cluster. The design includes an initial period in which no clusters are exposed to the intervention. Subsequently, at regular intervals (the "steps") one cl…
PP07 Are Cardiovascular Trial Results Systematically different between Europe and North America? A Multi-Study Analysis
Background Concerns that there are international differences in treatment effectiveness have led many countries to be reluctant to extrapolate foreign clinical data to use as the basis of their guideline recommendations and in the approval of new interventions. Much of the evidence on which these concerns are based, however, comes from a limited data set, with few studies directly assessing international differences in treatment effectiveness. Th…
Who's afraid Of Thomas Bayes
Sometimes direct evidence is so strong that a prescription for practice is decreed. Usually, things are not that simple—leaving aside the possibility that important trade offs may be involved, direct comparative data may be imprecise (especially in crucial sub-groups) or subject to possible bias, or there may be no direct comparative evidence; but still decisions have to be made. In these circumstances, indirect evidence—the plausibility of effec…
The use of equipoise in clinical trials
The use of equipoise in clinical trials
Who's afraid Of Thomas Bayes
Sometimes direct evidence is so strong that a prescription for practice is decreed. Usually, things are not that simple—leaving aside the possibility that important trade offs may be involved, direct comparative data may be imprecise (especially in crucial sub-groups) or subject to possible bias, or there may be no direct comparative evidence; but still decisions have to be made. In these circumstances, indirect evidence—the plausibility of effec…
PP07 Are Cardiovascular Trial Results Systematically different between Europe and North America? A Multi-Study Analysis
Background Concerns that there are international differences in treatment effectiveness have led many countries to be reluctant to extrapolate foreign clinical data to use as the basis of their guideline recommendations and in the approval of new interventions. Much of the evidence on which these concerns are based, however, comes from a limited data set, with few studies directly assessing international differences in treatment effectiveness. Th…
The stepped wedge cluster randomised trial
The stepped wedge cluster randomised controlled trial is a relatively new study design that is increasing in popularity. It is an alternative to parallel cluster trial designs, which are commonly used for the evaluation of service delivery or policy interventions delivered at the level of the cluster. The design includes an initial period in which no clusters are exposed to the intervention. Subsequently, at regular intervals (the "steps") one cl…
Medicine (4 works) · Randomized controlled trial (3 works) · Clinical trial (2 works) · Computer Science (2 works) · Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (2 works) · Internal Medicine (2 works) · Psychology (2 works) · Surgery (2 works) · Assisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy (1 works) · Bridging (networking (1 works)