Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Tadeusz Ciecierski

Biographic Data

ID1278484
NAMETadeusz Ciecierski
GIVEN NAMESTadeusz
FAMILY NAMECiecierski
SIGNATURECIECIERSKI T
AFFILIATIONSUniversity of Warsaw
ORCID0000-0001-5403-9590
VERIFIEDYes
TOTAL WORKS7
TOTAL CITATIONS3
WORKS AS AUTHOR7
WORKS AS EDITOR0
FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR2020
LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR2023
H-INDEX1
  • A Not-so-Simple Rule for ‘I’

    Open Access•Tadeusz Ciecierski, Jakub Rudnicki•ARTICLE•The Philosophical Quarterly•2023•Cited by: 2•References: 1

    Maximilian de Gaynesford has argued against the standard view that the reference of the first-person pronoun ‘I’ is determined by a rule linking the referent to some feature of the context of use. In this paper, we argue that de Gaynesford's arguments are inconclusive. Our main aim, however, is to formulate a novel version of the reference rule for ‘I’. We argue that this version can deal with several problematic cases. Our strategy involves anal…

  • Demonstrations as actions

    Open Access•Tadeusz Ciecierski, Piotr Tomasz Makowski•ARTICLE•Synthese•2022•References: 52

    This paper presents a dual intention model (DIM) of demonstrations as actions to show the agentive nature of demonstrations. According to the DIM, demonstrations are complex actions that contain as components at least three elements: an abductive intention, a deictic intention, and a basic ostensive act of indication. This paper unpacks these three components and discusses their roles from the viewpoint of the philosophy of action and the philoso…

  • Indexicality, meaning, use

    Open Access•Tadeusz Ciecierski•ARTICLE•Semiotica•2021

    The article presents two concepts of indexicality. The first, more standard and narrow, identifies indexicality with systematic (meaning controlled) context-sensitivity. The second, broader (derived from the work of Jerzy Pelc), conceives indexicality in terms of the potential variability of the general semiotic characteristics expressions (with respect to the context of use). The text introduces the concept of a pragmatic matrix that serves for …

  • An Introduction

    Open Access•Tadeusz Ciecierski, Paweł Grabarczyk•ARTICLE•Axiomathes•2021

    This introduction to the special issue ‘Foundational issues in semantics and pragmatics’ contains a brief description of the content of the volume

  • An Introduction

    Open Access•Tadeusz Ciecierski, Paweł Grabarczyk•ARTICLE•Theoria•2021

  • An introduction

    Open Access•Tadeusz Ciecierski•ARTICLE•Semiotica•2021•Cited by: 1•References: 6

  • Utterances, Sub‐utterances and Token‐Reflexivity

    Open Access•Tadeusz Ciecierski•ARTICLE•Theoria•2020

    The popular interpretation of token‐reflexivism states that at the level of logical form, indexicals and demonstratives are disguised descriptions that employ complex demonstratives or special quotation‐mark names involving particular tokens of the appropriate expression‐types. In this article I first demonstrate that this interpretation of token‐reflexivism is only one of many, and that it is better to think of token‐reflexivism as denoting a fa…

  • A Not-so-Simple Rule for ‘I’

    Open Access•Tadeusz Ciecierski, Jakub Rudnicki•ARTICLE•The Philosophical Quarterly•2023•Cited by: 2•References: 1

    Maximilian de Gaynesford has argued against the standard view that the reference of the first-person pronoun ‘I’ is determined by a rule linking the referent to some feature of the context of use. In this paper, we argue that de Gaynesford's arguments are inconclusive. Our main aim, however, is to formulate a novel version of the reference rule for ‘I’. We argue that this version can deal with several problematic cases. Our strategy involves anal…

  • An introduction

    Open Access•Tadeusz Ciecierski•ARTICLE•Semiotica•2021•Cited by: 1•References: 6

  • Utterances, Sub‐utterances and Token‐Reflexivity

    Open Access•Tadeusz Ciecierski•ARTICLE•Theoria•2020

    The popular interpretation of token‐reflexivism states that at the level of logical form, indexicals and demonstratives are disguised descriptions that employ complex demonstratives or special quotation‐mark names involving particular tokens of the appropriate expression‐types. In this article I first demonstrate that this interpretation of token‐reflexivism is only one of many, and that it is better to think of token‐reflexivism as denoting a fa…

  • Indexicality, meaning, use

    Open Access•Tadeusz Ciecierski•ARTICLE•Semiotica•2021

    The article presents two concepts of indexicality. The first, more standard and narrow, identifies indexicality with systematic (meaning controlled) context-sensitivity. The second, broader (derived from the work of Jerzy Pelc), conceives indexicality in terms of the potential variability of the general semiotic characteristics expressions (with respect to the context of use). The text introduces the concept of a pragmatic matrix that serves for …

  • An Introduction

    Open Access•Tadeusz Ciecierski, Paweł Grabarczyk•ARTICLE•Axiomathes•2021

    This introduction to the special issue ‘Foundational issues in semantics and pragmatics’ contains a brief description of the content of the volume

  • An Introduction

    Open Access•Tadeusz Ciecierski, Paweł Grabarczyk•ARTICLE•Theoria•2021

  • An introduction

    Open Access•Tadeusz Ciecierski•ARTICLE•Semiotica•2021•Cited by: 1•References: 6

  • Demonstrations as actions

    Open Access•Tadeusz Ciecierski, Piotr Tomasz Makowski•ARTICLE•Synthese•2022•References: 52

    This paper presents a dual intention model (DIM) of demonstrations as actions to show the agentive nature of demonstrations. According to the DIM, demonstrations are complex actions that contain as components at least three elements: an abductive intention, a deictic intention, and a basic ostensive act of indication. This paper unpacks these three components and discusses their roles from the viewpoint of the philosophy of action and the philoso…

  • A Not-so-Simple Rule for ‘I’

    Open Access•Tadeusz Ciecierski, Jakub Rudnicki•ARTICLE•The Philosophical Quarterly•2023•Cited by: 2•References: 1

    Maximilian de Gaynesford has argued against the standard view that the reference of the first-person pronoun ‘I’ is determined by a rule linking the referent to some feature of the context of use. In this paper, we argue that de Gaynesford's arguments are inconclusive. Our main aim, however, is to formulate a novel version of the reference rule for ‘I’. We argue that this version can deal with several problematic cases. Our strategy involves anal…

Philosophy (7 works) · Epistemology (6 works) · Linguistics (6 works) · Computer Science (4 works) · Sociology (4 works) · Context (archaeology) (3 works) · History (3 works) · Artificial Intelligence (2 works) · Artificial Intelligence (2 works) · Cognitive science (2 works)

Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae