Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Line Edslev Andersen

Biographic Data

ID1285593
NAMELine Edslev Andersen
GIVEN NAMESLine Edslev
FAMILY NAMEAndersen
SIGNATUREANDERSEN L E
AFFILIATIONSAarhus University
ORCID0000-0003-2909-4306
VERIFIEDYes
TOTAL WORKS5
TOTAL CITATIONS14
WORKS AS AUTHOR5
WORKS AS EDITOR0
FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR2019
LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR2024
H-INDEX3
  • What’s the Point of Authors

    Line Edslev Andersen, R A Bailey et al.•ARTICLE•The British Journal for the…•2024•Cited by: 3•References: 122

    In this paper, I want to start to untangle some of the philosophical issues associated with our practices of ascribing authorship for collaborative work, with an eye to formulating better guidelines for authorship. I will focus on the following questions: 1. What epistemic, social, and ethical functions are played by our practices of ascribing authorship for academic papers? 2. What ways of ascribing authorship would best address these functions?…

  • The role of testimony in mathematics

    Open Access•Line Edslev Andersen, Hanne Andersen et al.•ARTICLE•Synthese•2021•Cited by: 1•References: 21

  • Mathematicians writing for mathematicians

    Open Access•Line Edslev Andersen, Mikkel Willum Johansen et al.•ARTICLE•Synthese•2021•Cited by: 3•References: 17

  • Acceptable gaps in mathematical proofs

    Open Access•Line Edslev Andersen•ARTICLE•Synthese•2020•Cited by: 6•References: 23

  • Detecting errors that result in retractions

    Open Access•Line Edslev Andersen, K Brad Wray•ARTICLE•Social Studies of Science•2019•Cited by: 1•References: 1

    We present a taxonomy of errors in the scientific literature and an account of how the errors are distributed over the categories. We have developed the taxonomy by studying substantial errors in the scientific literature as described in retraction notices published in the journal Science over the past 35 years. We then examine how the sorts of errors that lead to retracted papers can be prevented and detected, considering the perspective of coll…

  • Acceptable gaps in mathematical proofs

    Open Access•Line Edslev Andersen•ARTICLE•Synthese•2020•Cited by: 6•References: 23

  • What’s the Point of Authors

    Line Edslev Andersen, R A Bailey et al.•ARTICLE•The British Journal for the…•2024•Cited by: 3•References: 122

    In this paper, I want to start to untangle some of the philosophical issues associated with our practices of ascribing authorship for collaborative work, with an eye to formulating better guidelines for authorship. I will focus on the following questions: 1. What epistemic, social, and ethical functions are played by our practices of ascribing authorship for academic papers? 2. What ways of ascribing authorship would best address these functions?…

  • Mathematicians writing for mathematicians

    Open Access•Line Edslev Andersen, Mikkel Willum Johansen et al.•ARTICLE•Synthese•2021•Cited by: 3•References: 17

  • The role of testimony in mathematics

    Open Access•Line Edslev Andersen, Hanne Andersen et al.•ARTICLE•Synthese•2021•Cited by: 1•References: 21

  • Detecting errors that result in retractions

    Open Access•Line Edslev Andersen, K Brad Wray•ARTICLE•Social Studies of Science•2019•Cited by: 1•References: 1

    We present a taxonomy of errors in the scientific literature and an account of how the errors are distributed over the categories. We have developed the taxonomy by studying substantial errors in the scientific literature as described in retraction notices published in the journal Science over the past 35 years. We then examine how the sorts of errors that lead to retracted papers can be prevented and detected, considering the perspective of coll…

  • Detecting errors that result in retractions

    Open Access•Line Edslev Andersen, K Brad Wray•ARTICLE•Social Studies of Science•2019•Cited by: 1•References: 1

    We present a taxonomy of errors in the scientific literature and an account of how the errors are distributed over the categories. We have developed the taxonomy by studying substantial errors in the scientific literature as described in retraction notices published in the journal Science over the past 35 years. We then examine how the sorts of errors that lead to retracted papers can be prevented and detected, considering the perspective of coll…

  • Acceptable gaps in mathematical proofs

    Open Access•Line Edslev Andersen•ARTICLE•Synthese•2020•Cited by: 6•References: 23

  • The role of testimony in mathematics

    Open Access•Line Edslev Andersen, Hanne Andersen et al.•ARTICLE•Synthese•2021•Cited by: 1•References: 21

  • Mathematicians writing for mathematicians

    Open Access•Line Edslev Andersen, Mikkel Willum Johansen et al.•ARTICLE•Synthese•2021•Cited by: 3•References: 17

  • What’s the Point of Authors

    Line Edslev Andersen, R A Bailey et al.•ARTICLE•The British Journal for the…•2024•Cited by: 3•References: 122

    In this paper, I want to start to untangle some of the philosophical issues associated with our practices of ascribing authorship for collaborative work, with an eye to formulating better guidelines for authorship. I will focus on the following questions: 1. What epistemic, social, and ethical functions are played by our practices of ascribing authorship for academic papers? 2. What ways of ascribing authorship would best address these functions?…

Computer Science (4 works) · Epistemology (4 works) · Mathematics (4 works) · Philosophy (4 works) · Mathematical proof (3 works) · Metaphysics (3 works) · Philosophy of language (3 works) · Calculus (dental) (2 works) · Medicine (2 works) · Philosophy and History of Science (2 works)

Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae