Luis Estrada-González
Biographic Data
| ID | 1287410 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Luis Estrada-González |
| GIVEN NAMES | Luis |
| FAMILY NAME | Estrada-González |
| SIGNATURE | ESTRADA-GONZÁLEZ L |
| AFFILIATIONS | Institut de recherches philosophiques |
| ORCID | 0000-0002-1466-0240 |
| VERIFIED | Yes |
| TOTAL WORKS | 9 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 1 |
| AUTHOR COUNT | 9 |
| EDITOR COUNT | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2018 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2025 |
| H-INDEX | 1 |
Cómo dejamos de preocuparnos y aprendimos a amar a tonk
Según la sabiduría popular, la conectiva tonk definida por Prior trivializa cualquier teoría que la incluya. Sin embargo, no hay que olvidar que, si un argumento es lógicamente válido o no, depende en buena medida de la noción de consecuencia lógica subyacente. Casi siempre se asume que la consecuencia lógica es tarskiana, esto es, que es reflexiva, transitiva y monotónica. Sin embargo, Belnap había conjeturado que tonk podría no ser tan problemá…
An Easy Road to Multi-contra-classicality
A contra-classical logic is a logic that, over the same language as that of classical logic, validates arguments that are not classically valid. In this paper I investigate whether there is a single, non-trivial logic that exhibits many features of already known contra-classical logics. I show that Mortensen's three-valued connexive logic M3V is one such logic and, furthermore, that following the example in building M3V , that is, putting a suita…
Revisiting Reichenbach’s logic
Knot is not that nasty (but it is hardier than tonk)
Sí hay negación lógica
En este artículo discutimos la tesis de Jc Beall según la cual no hay negación lógica. Evaluamos la solidez del argumento con el que defiende su tesis y presentamos dos razones para rechazar una de sus premisas: que la negación tiene que ser excluyente o exhaustiva. La primera razón involucra una presentación alternativa de las reglas de la negación en sistemas de secuentes diferentes al que Beall presupone. La segunda razón establece que la nega…
An Introduction to the Philosophy of Logic
Philosophy of logic is a fundamental part of philosophical study, and one which is increasingly recognized as being immensely important in relation to many issues in metaphysics, metametaphysics, epistemology, philosophy of mathematics, and philosophy of language. This textbook provides a comprehensive and accessible introduction to topics including the objectivity of logical inference rules and its relevance in discussions of epistemological rel…
Introduction to the Philosophy of Logic
Introduction to the Philosophy of Logic
May the Reinforcement Be with You: On the Reconstruction of Scientific Episodes
Like theories, reconstructions of episodes in the history of science can possess, or lack, certain virtues such that, when we face two or more different reconstructions of the same episode, we assume that we should choose the most “virtuous one”. However, we will argue that, with dissimilar reconstructions of the same episode, it is not always necessary to separate the “good ones” from the “wrong ones”, and that, as a matter of fact, each reconst…
May the Reinforcement Be with You: On the Reconstruction of Scientific Episodes
Like theories, reconstructions of episodes in the history of science can possess, or lack, certain virtues such that, when we face two or more different reconstructions of the same episode, we assume that we should choose the most “virtuous one”. However, we will argue that, with dissimilar reconstructions of the same episode, it is not always necessary to separate the “good ones” from the “wrong ones”, and that, as a matter of fact, each reconst…
An Introduction to the Philosophy of Logic
Philosophy of logic is a fundamental part of philosophical study, and one which is increasingly recognized as being immensely important in relation to many issues in metaphysics, metametaphysics, epistemology, philosophy of mathematics, and philosophy of language. This textbook provides a comprehensive and accessible introduction to topics including the objectivity of logical inference rules and its relevance in discussions of epistemological rel…
Introduction to the Philosophy of Logic
Introduction to the Philosophy of Logic
Sí hay negación lógica
En este artículo discutimos la tesis de Jc Beall según la cual no hay negación lógica. Evaluamos la solidez del argumento con el que defiende su tesis y presentamos dos razones para rechazar una de sus premisas: que la negación tiene que ser excluyente o exhaustiva. La primera razón involucra una presentación alternativa de las reglas de la negación en sistemas de secuentes diferentes al que Beall presupone. La segunda razón establece que la nega…
Revisiting Reichenbach’s logic
Knot is not that nasty (but it is hardier than tonk)
An Easy Road to Multi-contra-classicality
A contra-classical logic is a logic that, over the same language as that of classical logic, validates arguments that are not classically valid. In this paper I investigate whether there is a single, non-trivial logic that exhibits many features of already known contra-classical logics. I show that Mortensen's three-valued connexive logic M3V is one such logic and, furthermore, that following the example in building M3V , that is, putting a suita…
Cómo dejamos de preocuparnos y aprendimos a amar a tonk
Según la sabiduría popular, la conectiva tonk definida por Prior trivializa cualquier teoría que la incluya. Sin embargo, no hay que olvidar que, si un argumento es lógicamente válido o no, depende en buena medida de la noción de consecuencia lógica subyacente. Casi siempre se asume que la consecuencia lógica es tarskiana, esto es, que es reflexiva, transitiva y monotónica. Sin embargo, Belnap había conjeturado que tonk podría no ser tan problemá…
Philosophy (5 works) · Computer Science (4 works) · Epistemology (4 works) · Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge (3 works) · Advanced Algebra and Logic (2 works) · Art (2 works) · Engineering (2 works) · Humanities (2 works) · Logic (2 works) · Mathematics (2 works)