Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Hilliard Aronovitch

Biographic Data

ID1289015
NAMEHilliard Aronovitch
GIVEN NAMESHilliard
FAMILY NAMEAronovitch
SIGNATUREARONOVITCH H
AFFILIATIONSUniversity of Ottawa
VERIFIEDNo
TOTAL WORKS12
TOTAL CITATIONS31
AUTHOR COUNT12
EDITOR COUNT0
FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR1979
LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR2012
H-INDEX2
  • How Liberals Can Explain the Moral Errors of Past Eras and Answer Bernard Williams

    Open Access•Hilliard Aronovitch•ARTICLE•The Journal of Value Inquiry•2012

  • Interpreting Weber’s Ideal-Types

    Open Access•Hilliard Aronovitch•ARTICLE•Philosophy of the Social Sciences•2011•Cited by: 21•References: 7

    Weber’s notion of ideal-types has most frequently been rejected as incoherent or overly abstract. This article maintains that it insightfully addresses explanatory issues in social science by encompassing the agents’ subjective understanding and the need for theorists to comprehend, explain, and evaluate it. As such, ideal-types are not versions of established models in natural science or economics. Further keys are seeing ideal-types as blending…

  • The Role of Emotions in the Rule of Law

    Hilliard Aronovitch•ARTICLE•University of Toronto Law Journal•2007

  • Seceding The Canadian Way

    Hilliard Aronovitch•ARTICLE•Publius The Journal of Federalism•2006

    The Canadian Supreme Court's 1998 decision on whether Quebec has a right to secede was initially lauded for granting both the federal government and secessionists their due. The Court found there to be an implicit Constitutional right for Quebec to secede, but by negotiation of the terms, not one-sided action. It thus deemed secession both a legal and a political phenomenon. This paper critically reassesses the decision in light especially of rec…

  • Trudeau or Taylor? The Central Question

    Hilliard Aronovitch•ARTICLE•Critical Review of International…•2005•Cited by: 1•References: 5

    Juxtaposing Pierre Trudeau and Charles Taylor allows for assessing not simply an epoch in Canadian political life but more fundamentally two contrasting visions of modern government and society. The key is not in the usual contrasts: liberalism versus communitarianism or individual rights versus collective rights; but in the opposition between Trudeau’s centralized and Taylor’s decentralized vision of federalism. What emerges from analyzing that …

  • We the People

    Open Access•Hilliard Aronovitch•ARTICLE•Dialogue•2005•References: 9

    An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content

  • Nationalism in Theory and Reality

    Open Access•Hilliard Aronovitch•ARTICLE•Philosophy of the Social Sciences•2000•References: 3

  • Analogical Argument, Liberalism, and the Avoidance of Relativism: Reply to Lessnoff

    Open Access•Hilliard Aronovitch•ARTICLE•Political Studies•1997

  • The Political Importance of Analogical Argument

    Open Access•Hilliard Aronovitch•ARTICLE•Political Studies•1997•Cited by: 8

    Is there a form of reasoning somehow specially suited to political philosophy and political life? I contend that for a variety of reasons analogical argument is eminently apt for politics. Although the significance of analogical reasoning for law has been largely recognized, its similar suitability for morality and politics has mostly been ignored, though insights from Hampshire and others point the way. An eventual implication of my argument is …

  • In Defence of Modernity

    Open Access•Hilliard Aronovitch•ARTICLE•Dialogue•1995•References: 7

    Is the endeavour to probe the meaning of modernity other than a form of self-obsession, a kind of collective and conceptual narcissism, characteristic of the perhaps peculiarly modern preoccupation with abstract notions and inwardness? And whatever the motivation and origin, is the endeavour likely to issue in something better than doubtful or empty pronouncements, true to the extent that they are platitudes and false or obscure for the rest? Enc…

  • No End of Ideology

    Open Access•Hilliard Aronovitch•ARTICLE•Dialogue•1986•References: 1

    Since its coinage in the eighteenth century, the concept of ideology has been recurrently invoked as a tool of analysis, a term of abuse, or both together. The concept is central to the theories of Marx, Mannheim, and others, and the whole subject of the sociology of knowledge is an elaboration upon it. But just what the concept is meant to convey is normally so unclear or controversial, even question-begging, that it is natural to want to dispen…

  • Rational Motivation

    Hilliard Aronovitch•ARTICLE•Philosophy and Phenomenological…•1979•Cited by: 1

  • Interpreting Weber’s Ideal-Types

    Open Access•Hilliard Aronovitch•ARTICLE•Philosophy of the Social Sciences•2011•Cited by: 21•References: 7

    Weber’s notion of ideal-types has most frequently been rejected as incoherent or overly abstract. This article maintains that it insightfully addresses explanatory issues in social science by encompassing the agents’ subjective understanding and the need for theorists to comprehend, explain, and evaluate it. As such, ideal-types are not versions of established models in natural science or economics. Further keys are seeing ideal-types as blending…

  • The Political Importance of Analogical Argument

    Open Access•Hilliard Aronovitch•ARTICLE•Political Studies•1997•Cited by: 8

    Is there a form of reasoning somehow specially suited to political philosophy and political life? I contend that for a variety of reasons analogical argument is eminently apt for politics. Although the significance of analogical reasoning for law has been largely recognized, its similar suitability for morality and politics has mostly been ignored, though insights from Hampshire and others point the way. An eventual implication of my argument is …

  • Trudeau or Taylor? The Central Question

    Hilliard Aronovitch•ARTICLE•Critical Review of International…•2005•Cited by: 1•References: 5

    Juxtaposing Pierre Trudeau and Charles Taylor allows for assessing not simply an epoch in Canadian political life but more fundamentally two contrasting visions of modern government and society. The key is not in the usual contrasts: liberalism versus communitarianism or individual rights versus collective rights; but in the opposition between Trudeau’s centralized and Taylor’s decentralized vision of federalism. What emerges from analyzing that …

  • Rational Motivation

    Hilliard Aronovitch•ARTICLE•Philosophy and Phenomenological…•1979•Cited by: 1

  • Rational Motivation

    Hilliard Aronovitch•ARTICLE•Philosophy and Phenomenological…•1979•Cited by: 1

  • No End of Ideology

    Open Access•Hilliard Aronovitch•ARTICLE•Dialogue•1986•References: 1

    Since its coinage in the eighteenth century, the concept of ideology has been recurrently invoked as a tool of analysis, a term of abuse, or both together. The concept is central to the theories of Marx, Mannheim, and others, and the whole subject of the sociology of knowledge is an elaboration upon it. But just what the concept is meant to convey is normally so unclear or controversial, even question-begging, that it is natural to want to dispen…

  • In Defence of Modernity

    Open Access•Hilliard Aronovitch•ARTICLE•Dialogue•1995•References: 7

    Is the endeavour to probe the meaning of modernity other than a form of self-obsession, a kind of collective and conceptual narcissism, characteristic of the perhaps peculiarly modern preoccupation with abstract notions and inwardness? And whatever the motivation and origin, is the endeavour likely to issue in something better than doubtful or empty pronouncements, true to the extent that they are platitudes and false or obscure for the rest? Enc…

  • Analogical Argument, Liberalism, and the Avoidance of Relativism: Reply to Lessnoff

    Open Access•Hilliard Aronovitch•ARTICLE•Political Studies•1997

  • The Political Importance of Analogical Argument

    Open Access•Hilliard Aronovitch•ARTICLE•Political Studies•1997•Cited by: 8

    Is there a form of reasoning somehow specially suited to political philosophy and political life? I contend that for a variety of reasons analogical argument is eminently apt for politics. Although the significance of analogical reasoning for law has been largely recognized, its similar suitability for morality and politics has mostly been ignored, though insights from Hampshire and others point the way. An eventual implication of my argument is …

  • Nationalism in Theory and Reality

    Open Access•Hilliard Aronovitch•ARTICLE•Philosophy of the Social Sciences•2000•References: 3

  • Trudeau or Taylor? The Central Question

    Hilliard Aronovitch•ARTICLE•Critical Review of International…•2005•Cited by: 1•References: 5

    Juxtaposing Pierre Trudeau and Charles Taylor allows for assessing not simply an epoch in Canadian political life but more fundamentally two contrasting visions of modern government and society. The key is not in the usual contrasts: liberalism versus communitarianism or individual rights versus collective rights; but in the opposition between Trudeau’s centralized and Taylor’s decentralized vision of federalism. What emerges from analyzing that …

  • We the People

    Open Access•Hilliard Aronovitch•ARTICLE•Dialogue•2005•References: 9

    An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content

  • Seceding The Canadian Way

    Hilliard Aronovitch•ARTICLE•Publius The Journal of Federalism•2006

    The Canadian Supreme Court's 1998 decision on whether Quebec has a right to secede was initially lauded for granting both the federal government and secessionists their due. The Court found there to be an implicit Constitutional right for Quebec to secede, but by negotiation of the terms, not one-sided action. It thus deemed secession both a legal and a political phenomenon. This paper critically reassesses the decision in light especially of rec…

  • The Role of Emotions in the Rule of Law

    Hilliard Aronovitch•ARTICLE•University of Toronto Law Journal•2007

  • Interpreting Weber’s Ideal-Types

    Open Access•Hilliard Aronovitch•ARTICLE•Philosophy of the Social Sciences•2011•Cited by: 21•References: 7

    Weber’s notion of ideal-types has most frequently been rejected as incoherent or overly abstract. This article maintains that it insightfully addresses explanatory issues in social science by encompassing the agents’ subjective understanding and the need for theorists to comprehend, explain, and evaluate it. As such, ideal-types are not versions of established models in natural science or economics. Further keys are seeing ideal-types as blending…

  • How Liberals Can Explain the Moral Errors of Past Eras and Answer Bernard Williams

    Open Access•Hilliard Aronovitch•ARTICLE•The Journal of Value Inquiry•2012

Law (8 works) · Philosophy (8 works) · Sociology (8 works) · Epistemology (7 works) · Political science (7 works) · Politics (7 works) · Philosophy (5 works) · Political Philosophy and Ethics (5 works) · Psychology (5 works) · Law (4 works)

Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae