Nikolaj Nottelmann

Biographic Data

ID1291665
NAMENikolaj Nottelmann
GIVEN NAMESNikolaj
FAMILY NAMENottelmann
SIGNATURENOTTELMANN N
AFFILIATIONSUniversity of Southern Denmark
ORCID0000-0002-8621-6640
VERIFIEDYes
TOTAL WORKS10
TOTAL CITATIONS5
AUTHOR COUNT10
EDITOR COUNT0
FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR2007
LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR2025
H-INDEX1

  • Epistemic Challenges Faced by Non-native English Speakers in Philosophy: Evidence from an International Survey

    Open AccessUwe Peters, Yener Cagla Cimendereli et al.ARTICLEReview of Philosophy and Psychology2025

    The widespread use of English in the field of philosophy facilitates international collaboration but may also pose significant challenges in understanding, analyzing, or producing information for both native (NES) and non-native English speakers (NNES). These challenges have not yet been systematically investigated. We conducted an international survey of philosophers ( N = 1,615), comparing NES and NNES, while controlling for their academic posi…

  • Are We Pre-Theoretically Committed to Doxastic Voluntarism

    Open AccessNikolaj Nottelmann, Anthony Robert Booth et al.ARTICLEReview of Philosophy and Psychology2023

  • Scaffolded practical knowledge: A problem for intellectualism

    Open AccessNikolaj Nottelmann, Kári ThorssonARTICLEPhilosophical Studies2021

  • Weighing the costs: The epistemic dilemma of no-platforming

    Open AccessUwe Peters, Nikolaj NottelmannARTICLESynthese2021References: 24

    ‘No-platforming’—the practice of denying someone the opportunity to express their opinion at certain venues because of the perceived abhorrent or misguided nature of their view(s)—is a hot topic. Several philosophers have advanced epistemic reasons for using the policy in certain cases. Here we introduce epistemic considerations against no-platforming that are relevant for the reflection on the cases at issue. We then contend that three recent ep…

  • Om positivisme og objektivisme i samfundsvidenskaberne

    Nikolaj NottelmannARTICLEDansk Sociologi2017

    ”Positivisme” hører til de mest kontroversielle og mangetydige termer i moderne debatter om samfundsvidenskabelig metode. Bredt anvendte lærebøger er på én gang ofte uklare og voldsomt indbyrdes uenige angående positivismens metafysiske, erkendelsmæssige og ideologiske forpligtelser. Denne artikel leverer en receptionshistorisk behandling af positivismen fra dens dobbelte udspring i det 19. århundredes franske og tyske filosofi frem til i dag. He…

  • Against a descriptive vindication of doxastic voluntarism

    Open AccessNikolaj NottelmannARTICLESynthese2017Cited by: 1References: 15

  • The deontological conception of epistemic justification: A reassessment

    Open AccessNikolaj NottelmannARTICLESynthese2013Cited by: 4References: 5

  • Teaching & Learning Guide for: Belief-Desire Explanation

    Open AccessNikolaj NottelmannARTICLEPhilosophy Compass2012

    This guide accompanies the following article: Nikolaj Nottelmann, 'Belief-Desire Explanation'. Philosophy Compass Vol/Iss (2011): 1-10. doi: 10.1111/j.1747-9991.2011.00446.xAuthor's Introduction"Belief-desire explanation" is short-hand for a type of action explanation that appeals to a set of the agent's mental states consisting of 1. Her desire to ψ and 2. Her belief that, were she to φ, she would promote her ψ-ing. Here, to ψ could be to eat an…

  • Belief-Desire Explanation

    Open AccessNikolaj NottelmannARTICLEPhilosophy Compass2011References: 8

    Theses claiming a constitutive or necessary role for belief-desire pairs in the rationalizing, motivation or explanation of action, are generally known as Humean. The main purpose of this short paper is clearly to present the basic versions of Humeanism and lay bare their commitments and interrelations in preparation for a short general introduction to the debate over belief-desire explanation of action. After this, some influential arguments for…

  • Blameworthy Belief: A Study in Epistemic Deontologism

    Open AccessNikolaj NottelmannBOOKBlameworthy Belief2007