Jonathan L Shaheen
Biographic Data
| ID | 1292436 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Jonathan L Shaheen |
| GIVEN NAMES | Jonathan L |
| FAMILY NAME | Shaheen |
| SIGNATURE | SHAHEEN J L |
| AFFILIATIONS | Uppsala University |
| VERIFIED | No |
| TOTAL WORKS | 6 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 1 |
| WORKS AS AUTHOR | 6 |
| WORKS AS EDITOR | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2011 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2024 |
| H-INDEX | 1 |
An Argumental Discourse Before All
Cavendish directs readers of Observations upon Experimental Philosophy to begin engaging her work through "An Argumental Discourse." In this piece, I describe a way of thinking about the structure of that piece and how to understand two of its major moments in relationship to standardly taught material. The first moment is the dilemma about how inanimate matter is moved, with its response centered on treating a horse and its rider as a paradigm e…
A Vitalist Shoal in the Mechanist Tide
This paper reconstructs Margaret Cavendish’s theory of the metaphysics of artifacts. It situates her anti-mechanist account of artifactual production and the art-nature distinction against a background of Aristotelian, Scholastic, and mechanist theories. Within this broad context, it considers what Cavendish thinks artisans can actually do, grounding her terminological stipulation that there is no genuine generation in nature in a commitment to n…
How general can theories of ‘why’ and ‘because’ be
This paper explores a taxonomy of uses of ‘because’ from the linguistics literature. It traces the apparent semantic differences between content, epistemic, and act ‘because’ to differences in attachment height. But it argues that the fact that these uses of ‘because’ never occur in the same environments is evidence of an underlying semantic unity. Arguments from such a distribution to underlying unity are familiar from phonology and morphology, …
Part of nature and division in Margaret Cavendish’s materialism
Ambiguity and explanation
This paper presents evidence that ‘because’ is importantly ambiguous between two closely related senses covering what are usually called causal explanations, on the one hand, and grounding or metaphysical explanations, on the other hand. To this end, it introduces the lexical categories of monosemy, polysemy and homonymy; describes a test for polysemy; and discusses the results of the test when applied to ‘because’. It also shows how to understan…
Prosaic Witchcraft and Semiotic Totalitarianism
Studies of witchcraft belief and persecution in Russia have been profoundly, and to a significant degree mistakenly, shaped by European understandings of witchcraft as fundamentally demonic and integrally linked to the power of the devil. Gary Morson and Caryl Emerson's concepts of "prosaics" and "semiotic totalitarianism," derived from their readings of M. M. Bakhtin, offer a productive way to set imported preconceptions aside and to comprehend …
Prosaic Witchcraft and Semiotic Totalitarianism
Studies of witchcraft belief and persecution in Russia have been profoundly, and to a significant degree mistakenly, shaped by European understandings of witchcraft as fundamentally demonic and integrally linked to the power of the devil. Gary Morson and Caryl Emerson's concepts of "prosaics" and "semiotic totalitarianism," derived from their readings of M. M. Bakhtin, offer a productive way to set imported preconceptions aside and to comprehend …
Prosaic Witchcraft and Semiotic Totalitarianism
Studies of witchcraft belief and persecution in Russia have been profoundly, and to a significant degree mistakenly, shaped by European understandings of witchcraft as fundamentally demonic and integrally linked to the power of the devil. Gary Morson and Caryl Emerson's concepts of "prosaics" and "semiotic totalitarianism," derived from their readings of M. M. Bakhtin, offer a productive way to set imported preconceptions aside and to comprehend …
Ambiguity and explanation
This paper presents evidence that ‘because’ is importantly ambiguous between two closely related senses covering what are usually called causal explanations, on the one hand, and grounding or metaphysical explanations, on the other hand. To this end, it introduces the lexical categories of monosemy, polysemy and homonymy; describes a test for polysemy; and discusses the results of the test when applied to ‘because’. It also shows how to understan…
Part of nature and division in Margaret Cavendish’s materialism
A Vitalist Shoal in the Mechanist Tide
This paper reconstructs Margaret Cavendish’s theory of the metaphysics of artifacts. It situates her anti-mechanist account of artifactual production and the art-nature distinction against a background of Aristotelian, Scholastic, and mechanist theories. Within this broad context, it considers what Cavendish thinks artisans can actually do, grounding her terminological stipulation that there is no genuine generation in nature in a commitment to n…
How general can theories of ‘why’ and ‘because’ be
This paper explores a taxonomy of uses of ‘because’ from the linguistics literature. It traces the apparent semantic differences between content, epistemic, and act ‘because’ to differences in attachment height. But it argues that the fact that these uses of ‘because’ never occur in the same environments is evidence of an underlying semantic unity. Arguments from such a distribution to underlying unity are familiar from phonology and morphology, …
An Argumental Discourse Before All
Cavendish directs readers of Observations upon Experimental Philosophy to begin engaging her work through "An Argumental Discourse." In this piece, I describe a way of thinking about the structure of that piece and how to understand two of its major moments in relationship to standardly taught material. The first moment is the dilemma about how inanimate matter is moved, with its response centered on treating a horse and its rider as a paradigm e…
Philosophy (6 works) · Epistemology (5 works) · Linguistics (4 works) · Metaphysics (3 works) · Ambiguity (2 works) · Art (2 works) · Computer Science (2 works) · Historical Philosophy and Science (2 works) · History of Science and Medicine (2 works) · Law (2 works)