Daniel Immerman
Biographic Data
| ID | 1295021 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Daniel Immerman |
| GIVEN NAMES | Daniel |
| FAMILY NAME | Immerman |
| SIGNATURE | IMMERMAN D |
| AFFILIATIONS | Cycorp, Austin, TX, USA |
| ORCID | 0000-0003-4707-3269 |
| VERIFIED | Yes |
| TOTAL WORKS | 6 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 1 |
| AUTHOR COUNT | 6 |
| EDITOR COUNT | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2017 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2022 |
| H-INDEX | 1 |
The paradigm response to skepticism
Harm, Baselines, and the Worse than Nothing Account
Harm is one of the central concepts of ethics, so it would be good to offer an account of it. Many accounts appeal to a baseline: They say that you harm someone if you leave them worse off than in the baseline case. In this paper, I draw some lessons regarding what counts as an appropriate baseline and explore what these general lessons reveal about the nature of harm. In the process of so doing, I argue that a certain rarely discussed account of…
How should we accommodate our future misbehavior? The answer turns on how bad it will be
Williamson, closure, and KK
Does Ought Imply Ought Ought
Knows-knows principles in epistemology (KK principles for short) say that if you know some proposition, then you are in a position to know that you know it. This paper examines the viability of analogous principles in ethics, which I call ought-ought principles (OO principles for short). Several epistemologists have recently offered new defences of KK principles and of other related principles, and there has recently been an increased interest in…
Question closure to solve the surprise test
Harm, Baselines, and the Worse than Nothing Account
Harm is one of the central concepts of ethics, so it would be good to offer an account of it. Many accounts appeal to a baseline: They say that you harm someone if you leave them worse off than in the baseline case. In this paper, I draw some lessons regarding what counts as an appropriate baseline and explore what these general lessons reveal about the nature of harm. In the process of so doing, I argue that a certain rarely discussed account of…
Question closure to solve the surprise test
Does Ought Imply Ought Ought
Knows-knows principles in epistemology (KK principles for short) say that if you know some proposition, then you are in a position to know that you know it. This paper examines the viability of analogous principles in ethics, which I call ought-ought principles (OO principles for short). Several epistemologists have recently offered new defences of KK principles and of other related principles, and there has recently been an increased interest in…
How should we accommodate our future misbehavior? The answer turns on how bad it will be
Williamson, closure, and KK
The paradigm response to skepticism
Harm, Baselines, and the Worse than Nothing Account
Harm is one of the central concepts of ethics, so it would be good to offer an account of it. Many accounts appeal to a baseline: They say that you harm someone if you leave them worse off than in the baseline case. In this paper, I draw some lessons regarding what counts as an appropriate baseline and explore what these general lessons reveal about the nature of harm. In the process of so doing, I argue that a certain rarely discussed account of…
Epistemology (6 works) · Philosophy (6 works) · Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (4 works) · Free Will and Agency (4 works) · Metaphysics (4 works) · Philosophy of language (4 works) · Psychology (4 works) · Law (3 works) · Philosophy of science (3 works) · Political science (3 works)