Themistoklis Pantazakos
Dados Biográficos
| ID | 1295560 |
|---|---|
| NOME | Themistoklis Pantazakos |
| PRENOMES | Themistoklis |
| SOBRENOME | Pantazakos |
| ASSINATURA | PANTAZAKOS T |
| AFILIAÇÕES | University College London |
| ORCID | 0000-0002-4993-191X |
| VERIFICADO | Sim |
| TOTAL DE OBRAS | 4 |
| TOTAL DE CITAÇÕES | 6 |
| TOTAL COMO AUTOR | 4 |
| TOTAL COMO EDITOR | 0 |
| PRIMEIRO ANO DE PUBLICAÇÃO | 2019 |
| ANO MAIS RECENTE DE PUBLICAÇÃO | 2026 |
| ÍNDICE H | 1 |
The life-world as the empirical basis of science
The empirical foundation of science has often been characterised in terms of the observable-unobservable distinction, developed either syntactically, as a set of statements, or semantically, as aspects of the world represented by models. These approaches have faced well-known challenges: the difficulty of drawing a sharp line between observables and unobservables, the theory-ladenness of observation, and the problem of specifying what, exactly, i…
Determining the scope of epistemic injustice within psychiatry
In this article, we delve in debates around the usefulness of the notion of epistemic injustice in psychiatry to show that the concept has been misportrayed in the literature. We suggest that epistemic injustice should revolve around phenomenology and regard first and foremost the failure of mental health professionals to acquire and utilize information that service users are experts in, i.e. first-person testimony pertaining to what it is like t…
Problems of empirical solutions to the theory-ladenness of observation
Recent years have seen enticing empirical approaches to solving the epistemological problem of the theory-ladenness of observation. I group these approaches in two categories according to their method of choice: testing and refereeing. I argue that none deliver what friends of theory-neutrality want them to. Testing does not work because both evidence from cognitive neuroscience and perceptual pluralism independently invalidate the existence of a…
Treatment for whom? Towards a phenomenological resolution of controversy within autism treatment
Treatment for whom? Towards a phenomenological resolution of controversy within autism treatment
Problems of empirical solutions to the theory-ladenness of observation
Recent years have seen enticing empirical approaches to solving the epistemological problem of the theory-ladenness of observation. I group these approaches in two categories according to their method of choice: testing and refereeing. I argue that none deliver what friends of theory-neutrality want them to. Testing does not work because both evidence from cognitive neuroscience and perceptual pluralism independently invalidate the existence of a…
Determining the scope of epistemic injustice within psychiatry
In this article, we delve in debates around the usefulness of the notion of epistemic injustice in psychiatry to show that the concept has been misportrayed in the literature. We suggest that epistemic injustice should revolve around phenomenology and regard first and foremost the failure of mental health professionals to acquire and utilize information that service users are experts in, i.e. first-person testimony pertaining to what it is like t…
The life-world as the empirical basis of science
The empirical foundation of science has often been characterised in terms of the observable-unobservable distinction, developed either syntactically, as a set of statements, or semantically, as aspects of the world represented by models. These approaches have faced well-known challenges: the difficulty of drawing a sharp line between observables and unobservables, the theory-ladenness of observation, and the problem of specifying what, exactly, i…
Cognition (2 obras) · Cognitive science (2 obras) · Computer Science (2 obras) · Epistemology (2 obras) · Philosophy (2 obras) · Philosophy and History of Science (2 obras) · Philosophy of science (2 obras) · Psychology (2 obras) · Social Psychology (2 obras) · Autism Spectrum Disorder Research (1 obras)