Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Anders Kraal

Biographic Data

ID1295849
NAMEAnders Kraal
GIVEN NAMESAnders
FAMILY NAMEKraal
SIGNATUREKRAAL A
AFFILIATIONSUniversity of Calgary
VERIFIEDNo
TOTAL WORKS7
TOTAL CITATIONS0
AUTHOR COUNT7
EDITOR COUNT0
FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR2008
LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR2016
H-INDEX0
  • Luther's necessitarian argument in De servo arbitrio

    Open Access•Anders Kraal•ARTICLE•Religious Studies•2016

    In De servo arbitrio (1525) Luther famously argues that the divine attributes of will, power, foreknowledge, and immutability are incompatible with (human) free will, and hence that free will is a ‘name with no reality’. I survey some earlier explications of Luther's argument in the literature, and reject them as exegetically unsound. I then go on to propose a new explication. On the proposed explication, Luther's argument turns out to be theolog…

  • Valla-Style Determinism and the Intellectual Background of Luther's De servo arbitrio

    Open Access•Anders Kraal•ARTICLE•Harvard Theological Review•2015

    This paper argues that the Renaissance philosopher Lorenzo Valla's De libero arbitrio (1439) appears to anticipate Luther's De servo arbitrio (1525) on several key issues. This thesis was defended in the 1940s by the well-known Renaissance scholar Charles Trinkaus, who expressed regret over the fact that modern interpreters of Valla's dialogue had “failed to see its connection with the Reformation.” As we shall see further on, however, Trinkaus's…

  • The aim of Russell’s early logicism

    Open Access•Anders Kraal•ARTICLE•Synthese•2014•References: 7

  • Himma on the Free-Will Argument

    Open Access•Anders Kraal•ARTICLE•Religious Studies•2013

    In two recent articles in this journal Kenneth Himma has launched an attack on what he describes as the ‘two versions’ of the Free-Will Argument, the first of which he describes as ‘the standard’ version and the second of which he identifies with Plantinga's Free-Will Defence in God, Freedom, and Evil (1974). In this article I argue for three main claims: (i) that Himma's objections against ‘the standard’ Free-Will Argument are directed at a stra…

  • Teaching & Learning Guide for

    Open Access•Anders Kraal•ARTICLE•Philosophy Compass•2011

    This guide accompanies the following article: ‘Logic and Divine Simplicity’. Philosophy Compass 6/4 (2011): pp. 282–294, doi: 10.1111/j.1747‐9991.2011.00386.x Author’s Introduction First‐order formalizations of classical theistic doctrines are increasingly used in contemporary work in philosophy of religion and philosophical theology, as a means for clarifying the conceptual structure of the doctrines and their role in inferential procedures. But…

  • Logic and Divine Simplicity

    Open Access•Anders Kraal•ARTICLE•Philosophy Compass•2011•References: 14

    The paper surveys two contrasting views of first-order analyses of classical theistic doctrines about the existence and nature of God. On the first view, first-order logic provides methods for the adequate analysis of these doctrines, for example by construing 'God' as a singular term or as a monadic predicate, or by taking it to be a definite description. On the second view, such analyses are conceptually inadequate, at least when the doctrines …

  • The Status of Logic in Christian-Zen Buddhist Dialogue

    Anders Kraal•ARTICLE•Studies in Interreligious Dialogue•2008

No prominent works on this page.

  • The Status of Logic in Christian-Zen Buddhist Dialogue

    Anders Kraal•ARTICLE•Studies in Interreligious Dialogue•2008

  • Teaching & Learning Guide for

    Open Access•Anders Kraal•ARTICLE•Philosophy Compass•2011

    This guide accompanies the following article: ‘Logic and Divine Simplicity’. Philosophy Compass 6/4 (2011): pp. 282–294, doi: 10.1111/j.1747‐9991.2011.00386.x Author’s Introduction First‐order formalizations of classical theistic doctrines are increasingly used in contemporary work in philosophy of religion and philosophical theology, as a means for clarifying the conceptual structure of the doctrines and their role in inferential procedures. But…

  • Logic and Divine Simplicity

    Open Access•Anders Kraal•ARTICLE•Philosophy Compass•2011•References: 14

    The paper surveys two contrasting views of first-order analyses of classical theistic doctrines about the existence and nature of God. On the first view, first-order logic provides methods for the adequate analysis of these doctrines, for example by construing 'God' as a singular term or as a monadic predicate, or by taking it to be a definite description. On the second view, such analyses are conceptually inadequate, at least when the doctrines …

  • Himma on the Free-Will Argument

    Open Access•Anders Kraal•ARTICLE•Religious Studies•2013

    In two recent articles in this journal Kenneth Himma has launched an attack on what he describes as the ‘two versions’ of the Free-Will Argument, the first of which he describes as ‘the standard’ version and the second of which he identifies with Plantinga's Free-Will Defence in God, Freedom, and Evil (1974). In this article I argue for three main claims: (i) that Himma's objections against ‘the standard’ Free-Will Argument are directed at a stra…

  • The aim of Russell’s early logicism

    Open Access•Anders Kraal•ARTICLE•Synthese•2014•References: 7

  • Valla-Style Determinism and the Intellectual Background of Luther's De servo arbitrio

    Open Access•Anders Kraal•ARTICLE•Harvard Theological Review•2015

    This paper argues that the Renaissance philosopher Lorenzo Valla's De libero arbitrio (1439) appears to anticipate Luther's De servo arbitrio (1525) on several key issues. This thesis was defended in the 1940s by the well-known Renaissance scholar Charles Trinkaus, who expressed regret over the fact that modern interpreters of Valla's dialogue had “failed to see its connection with the Reformation.” As we shall see further on, however, Trinkaus's…

  • Luther's necessitarian argument in De servo arbitrio

    Open Access•Anders Kraal•ARTICLE•Religious Studies•2016

    In De servo arbitrio (1525) Luther famously argues that the divine attributes of will, power, foreknowledge, and immutability are incompatible with (human) free will, and hence that free will is a ‘name with no reality’. I survey some earlier explications of Luther's argument in the literature, and reject them as exegetically unsound. I then go on to propose a new explication. On the proposed explication, Luther's argument turns out to be theolog…

Philosophy (7 works) · Epistemology (6 works) · Theology (5 works) · Computer Science (4 works) · Theology and Philosophy of Evil (4 works) · Philosophy and Theoretical Science (3 works) · Argument (complex analysis) (2 works) · Doctrine (2 works) · Free Will and Agency (2 works) · Simplicity (2 works)

Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae