Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Diana L Magnuson

Biographic Data

ID1306443
NAMEDiana L Magnuson
GIVEN NAMESDiana L
FAMILY NAMEMagnuson
SIGNATUREMAGNUSON D L
AFFILIATIONSUniversity of Minnesota
ORCID0000-0002-8729-5109
VERIFIEDYes
TOTAL WORKS13
TOTAL CITATIONS32
AUTHOR COUNT13
EDITOR COUNT0
FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR1995
LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR2026
H-INDEX3
  • “Equally Available to Anyone”

    Open Access•Diana L Magnuson, Steven Ruggle•ARTICLE•Demography•2026

    Highlights The Census Bureau invented microdata as a product of the 1960 U.S. Census. The 1960 public use sample revolutionized analysis of the U.S. population and led to an outpouring of new census-based research. Interactions between academics and the Census Bureau at the Population Association of America played a central role in development of the first microdata. Continued collaboration between academics and the Census Bureau is needed to ens…

  • I don’t trust you’

    Open Access•Diana L Magnuson, Steven Ruggle•ARTICLE•Social Science History•2026•Cited by: 1•References: 21

    Three great waves of public anxiety about census privacy swept over the United States in the twentieth century. In 1940, 1970, and 2000, newspapers reported on fears of the public and politicians about invasive census questions. This article focuses on the second wave of privacy concerns surrounding the 1970 census, which focused on Big Brother and government overreach. The Census Bureau response stressed the confidentiality of census responses, …

  • Historical context and creation of the Ipums Ancestry full count population census data 1900–1930

    Matt A Nelson, Diana L Magnuson et al.•ARTICLE•Historical Methods A Journal of…•2025•Cited by: 1•References: 17

    IPUMS recently released final versions of full count census data for the United States 1900-1930. The information contained in these files is the product of three broad work stages: historical census enumeration, digitization, and IPUMS processing. The data were produced within an evolving institutional context and subjected to subsequent processes that had important ramifications on the final product. This paper documents these histories and pro…

  • Special issue introduction

    Catherine A Fitch, Diana L Magnuson•ARTICLE•Historical Methods A Journal of…•2025

  • New data sources for research on the nineteenth-century United States

    Matt A Nelson, Diana L Magnuson et al.•ARTICLE•Historical Methods A Journal of…•2025•Cited by: 2•References: 46

    IPUMS has finalized databases for each of the United States population censuses from 1850 to 1880. These data are the result of collaborations between FamilySearch and Ancestry.com, which provided the raw data, and IPUMS, which enhanced the data with editing, standardized coding, inter-census harmonization, and documentation. We discuss the data capture process conducted by the nineteenth-century United States Census Office, construction of the m…

  • It's None of Their Damn Business

    Open Access•Steven Ruggle, Steven Ruggles et al.•ARTICLE•Population and Development Review•2023•Cited by: 2•References: 38

    The U.S. Census has grappled with public concerns about privacy since the first enumeration in 1790. Beginning in the mid‐nineteenth century, census officials began responding to concerns about privacy with promises of confidentiality. In recent years, escalating concerns about confidentiality have threatened to reduce the usability of publicly accessible population data. This paper traces the history of privacy and disclosure control since 1790.…

  • Census Technology, Politics, and Institutional Change, 1790-2020

    Open Access•Steven Ruggle, Steven Ruggles et al.•ARTICLE•Journal of American History•2020•Cited by: 8•References: 1

    This article traces the history of the methods and technology used by the Census Bureau to convert individual census responses into published tabulations. We argue that political considerations not only shaped the content and applications of the census, but also the mechanics of census taking. By focusing on federal responses to a specific technical challenge over a very long span, our narrative illuminates the long-run effects of shifting societ…

  • The History of Quantification in History

    Steven Ruggle, Steven Ruggles et al.•ARTICLE•The Journal of Interdisciplinary…•2019•Cited by: 2•References: 14

    The use of quantitative methods in leading historical journals increased dramatically in the 1960s and declined sharply after the mid-1980s. The JIH is an invaluable source for analysis of the boom and bust in the use of quantitative methods in history; the journal remained under the same editors for almost fifty years and made no attempt to change editorial policies during that period. Shifting patterns of content and authorship in the JIH from …

  • A Victorian Feminist Christian

    Open Access•Diana L Magnuson•ARTICLE•Religious Studies Review•2006

  • Who Counts? The Politics of Census-Taking in Contemporary America

    Diana L Magnuson•ARTICLE•Historical Methods A Journal of…•2002

    (2002). Who Counts? The Politics of Census-Taking in Contemporary America: A Review Essay. Historical Methods: A Journal of Quantitative and Interdisciplinary History: Vol. 35, No. 1, pp. 43-46

  • Comparability of the Public Use Microdata Samples

    Diana L Magnuson, Miriam King et al.•ARTICLE•Historical Methods A Journal of…•1995•Cited by: 9

    (1995). Comparability of the Public Use Microdata Samples: Enumeration Procedures. Historical Methods: A Journal of Quantitative and Interdisciplinary History: Vol. 28, The Minnesota Historical Census Project, pp. 27-32

  • Who and what Determined the Content of the U.S. Population Schedule over Time

    Diana L Magnuson•ARTICLE•Historical Methods A Journal of…•1995•Cited by: 2

    (1995). Who and what Determined the Content of the U.S. Population Schedule over Time. Historical Methods: A Journal of Quantitative and Interdisciplinary History: Vol. 28, The Minnesota Historical Census Project, pp. 11-26

  • Perspectives on Historical U.S. Census Undercounts

    Miriam King, Miriam L King et al.•ARTICLE•Social Science History•1995•Cited by: 5

  • Comparability of the Public Use Microdata Samples

    Diana L Magnuson, Miriam King et al.•ARTICLE•Historical Methods A Journal of…•1995•Cited by: 9

    (1995). Comparability of the Public Use Microdata Samples: Enumeration Procedures. Historical Methods: A Journal of Quantitative and Interdisciplinary History: Vol. 28, The Minnesota Historical Census Project, pp. 27-32

  • Census Technology, Politics, and Institutional Change, 1790-2020

    Open Access•Steven Ruggle, Steven Ruggles et al.•ARTICLE•Journal of American History•2020•Cited by: 8•References: 1

    This article traces the history of the methods and technology used by the Census Bureau to convert individual census responses into published tabulations. We argue that political considerations not only shaped the content and applications of the census, but also the mechanics of census taking. By focusing on federal responses to a specific technical challenge over a very long span, our narrative illuminates the long-run effects of shifting societ…

  • Perspectives on Historical U.S. Census Undercounts

    Miriam King, Miriam L King et al.•ARTICLE•Social Science History•1995•Cited by: 5

  • New data sources for research on the nineteenth-century United States

    Matt A Nelson, Diana L Magnuson et al.•ARTICLE•Historical Methods A Journal of…•2025•Cited by: 2•References: 46

    IPUMS has finalized databases for each of the United States population censuses from 1850 to 1880. These data are the result of collaborations between FamilySearch and Ancestry.com, which provided the raw data, and IPUMS, which enhanced the data with editing, standardized coding, inter-census harmonization, and documentation. We discuss the data capture process conducted by the nineteenth-century United States Census Office, construction of the m…

  • It's None of Their Damn Business

    Open Access•Steven Ruggle, Steven Ruggles et al.•ARTICLE•Population and Development Review•2023•Cited by: 2•References: 38

    The U.S. Census has grappled with public concerns about privacy since the first enumeration in 1790. Beginning in the mid‐nineteenth century, census officials began responding to concerns about privacy with promises of confidentiality. In recent years, escalating concerns about confidentiality have threatened to reduce the usability of publicly accessible population data. This paper traces the history of privacy and disclosure control since 1790.…

  • The History of Quantification in History

    Steven Ruggle, Steven Ruggles et al.•ARTICLE•The Journal of Interdisciplinary…•2019•Cited by: 2•References: 14

    The use of quantitative methods in leading historical journals increased dramatically in the 1960s and declined sharply after the mid-1980s. The JIH is an invaluable source for analysis of the boom and bust in the use of quantitative methods in history; the journal remained under the same editors for almost fifty years and made no attempt to change editorial policies during that period. Shifting patterns of content and authorship in the JIH from …

  • Who and what Determined the Content of the U.S. Population Schedule over Time

    Diana L Magnuson•ARTICLE•Historical Methods A Journal of…•1995•Cited by: 2

    (1995). Who and what Determined the Content of the U.S. Population Schedule over Time. Historical Methods: A Journal of Quantitative and Interdisciplinary History: Vol. 28, The Minnesota Historical Census Project, pp. 11-26

  • I don’t trust you’

    Open Access•Diana L Magnuson, Steven Ruggle•ARTICLE•Social Science History•2026•Cited by: 1•References: 21

    Three great waves of public anxiety about census privacy swept over the United States in the twentieth century. In 1940, 1970, and 2000, newspapers reported on fears of the public and politicians about invasive census questions. This article focuses on the second wave of privacy concerns surrounding the 1970 census, which focused on Big Brother and government overreach. The Census Bureau response stressed the confidentiality of census responses, …

  • Historical context and creation of the Ipums Ancestry full count population census data 1900–1930

    Matt A Nelson, Diana L Magnuson et al.•ARTICLE•Historical Methods A Journal of…•2025•Cited by: 1•References: 17

    IPUMS recently released final versions of full count census data for the United States 1900-1930. The information contained in these files is the product of three broad work stages: historical census enumeration, digitization, and IPUMS processing. The data were produced within an evolving institutional context and subjected to subsequent processes that had important ramifications on the final product. This paper documents these histories and pro…

  • Comparability of the Public Use Microdata Samples

    Diana L Magnuson, Miriam King et al.•ARTICLE•Historical Methods A Journal of…•1995•Cited by: 9

    (1995). Comparability of the Public Use Microdata Samples: Enumeration Procedures. Historical Methods: A Journal of Quantitative and Interdisciplinary History: Vol. 28, The Minnesota Historical Census Project, pp. 27-32

  • Who and what Determined the Content of the U.S. Population Schedule over Time

    Diana L Magnuson•ARTICLE•Historical Methods A Journal of…•1995•Cited by: 2

    (1995). Who and what Determined the Content of the U.S. Population Schedule over Time. Historical Methods: A Journal of Quantitative and Interdisciplinary History: Vol. 28, The Minnesota Historical Census Project, pp. 11-26

  • Perspectives on Historical U.S. Census Undercounts

    Miriam King, Miriam L King et al.•ARTICLE•Social Science History•1995•Cited by: 5

  • Who Counts? The Politics of Census-Taking in Contemporary America

    Diana L Magnuson•ARTICLE•Historical Methods A Journal of…•2002

    (2002). Who Counts? The Politics of Census-Taking in Contemporary America: A Review Essay. Historical Methods: A Journal of Quantitative and Interdisciplinary History: Vol. 35, No. 1, pp. 43-46

  • A Victorian Feminist Christian

    Open Access•Diana L Magnuson•ARTICLE•Religious Studies Review•2006

  • The History of Quantification in History

    Steven Ruggle, Steven Ruggles et al.•ARTICLE•The Journal of Interdisciplinary…•2019•Cited by: 2•References: 14

    The use of quantitative methods in leading historical journals increased dramatically in the 1960s and declined sharply after the mid-1980s. The JIH is an invaluable source for analysis of the boom and bust in the use of quantitative methods in history; the journal remained under the same editors for almost fifty years and made no attempt to change editorial policies during that period. Shifting patterns of content and authorship in the JIH from …

  • Census Technology, Politics, and Institutional Change, 1790-2020

    Open Access•Steven Ruggle, Steven Ruggles et al.•ARTICLE•Journal of American History•2020•Cited by: 8•References: 1

    This article traces the history of the methods and technology used by the Census Bureau to convert individual census responses into published tabulations. We argue that political considerations not only shaped the content and applications of the census, but also the mechanics of census taking. By focusing on federal responses to a specific technical challenge over a very long span, our narrative illuminates the long-run effects of shifting societ…

  • It's None of Their Damn Business

    Open Access•Steven Ruggle, Steven Ruggles et al.•ARTICLE•Population and Development Review•2023•Cited by: 2•References: 38

    The U.S. Census has grappled with public concerns about privacy since the first enumeration in 1790. Beginning in the mid‐nineteenth century, census officials began responding to concerns about privacy with promises of confidentiality. In recent years, escalating concerns about confidentiality have threatened to reduce the usability of publicly accessible population data. This paper traces the history of privacy and disclosure control since 1790.…

  • Historical context and creation of the Ipums Ancestry full count population census data 1900–1930

    Matt A Nelson, Diana L Magnuson et al.•ARTICLE•Historical Methods A Journal of…•2025•Cited by: 1•References: 17

    IPUMS recently released final versions of full count census data for the United States 1900-1930. The information contained in these files is the product of three broad work stages: historical census enumeration, digitization, and IPUMS processing. The data were produced within an evolving institutional context and subjected to subsequent processes that had important ramifications on the final product. This paper documents these histories and pro…

  • Special issue introduction

    Catherine A Fitch, Diana L Magnuson•ARTICLE•Historical Methods A Journal of…•2025

  • New data sources for research on the nineteenth-century United States

    Matt A Nelson, Diana L Magnuson et al.•ARTICLE•Historical Methods A Journal of…•2025•Cited by: 2•References: 46

    IPUMS has finalized databases for each of the United States population censuses from 1850 to 1880. These data are the result of collaborations between FamilySearch and Ancestry.com, which provided the raw data, and IPUMS, which enhanced the data with editing, standardized coding, inter-census harmonization, and documentation. We discuss the data capture process conducted by the nineteenth-century United States Census Office, construction of the m…

  • “Equally Available to Anyone”

    Open Access•Diana L Magnuson, Steven Ruggle•ARTICLE•Demography•2026

    Highlights The Census Bureau invented microdata as a product of the 1960 U.S. Census. The 1960 public use sample revolutionized analysis of the U.S. population and led to an outpouring of new census-based research. Interactions between academics and the Census Bureau at the Population Association of America played a central role in development of the first microdata. Continued collaboration between academics and the Census Bureau is needed to ens…

  • I don’t trust you’

    Open Access•Diana L Magnuson, Steven Ruggle•ARTICLE•Social Science History•2026•Cited by: 1•References: 21

    Three great waves of public anxiety about census privacy swept over the United States in the twentieth century. In 1940, 1970, and 2000, newspapers reported on fears of the public and politicians about invasive census questions. This article focuses on the second wave of privacy concerns surrounding the 1970 census, which focused on Big Brother and government overreach. The Census Bureau response stressed the confidentiality of census responses, …

Census (11 works) · Census and Population Estimation (11 works) · Population (8 works) · Sociology (8 works) · Demography (7 works) · Computer Science (6 works) · Demography (6 works) · History (6 works) · Geography (5 works) · Political science (5 works)

Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae