Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Elina Vessonen

Biographic Data

ID1308964
NAMEElina Vessonen
GIVEN NAMESElina
FAMILY NAMEVessonen
SIGNATUREVESSONEN E
AFFILIATIONSUniversity of Cambridge
ORCID0000-0002-5931-6267
VERIFIEDYes
TOTAL WORKS5
TOTAL CITATIONS9
AUTHOR COUNT5
EDITOR COUNT0
FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR2017
LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR2021
H-INDEX2
  • Respectful operationalism

    Open Access•Elina Vessonen•ARTICLE•Theory & Psychology•2021

    I first argue that there are three major currents in the contemporary debate on operationalism. These are: (a) methodologists who criticize operationalism qua philosophy, (b) psychologists who practice operationalization that is allegedly philosophically noncommittal, and (c) critics who claim that psychologists’ validation practices commit them to stronger operationalism than psychologists realize. I then outline respectful operationalism and ar…

  • Conceptual engineering and operationalism in psychology

    Open Access•Elina Vessonen•ARTICLE•Synthese•2021•Cited by: 2•References: 42

    This paper applies conceptual engineering to deal with four objections that have been levelled against operationalism in psychology. These objections are: (i) operationalism leads to harmful proliferation of concepts, (ii) operationalism goes hand-in-hand with untenable antirealism, (iii) operationalism leads to arbitrariness in scientific concept formation, and (iv) operationalism is incompatible with the usual conception of scientific measureme…

  • The Complementarity of Psychometrics and the Representational Theory of Measurement

    Open Access•Elina Vessonen•ARTICLE•The British Journal for the…•2020•Cited by: 1•References: 41

    Psychometrics and the representational theory of measurement (RTM) are widely used in social scientific measurement. They are currently pursued largely in isolation from one another. I argue that despite their separation in practice, RTM and psychometrics are complementary approaches, because they can contribute in complementary ways to the establishment of what I argue is a crucial measurement property, namely, representational interpretability.…

  • Operationalism and realism in psychometrics

    Open Access•Elina Vessonen•ARTICLE•Philosophy Compass•2019•Cited by: 3•References: 58

    Psychometrics is one of the main approaches to social scientific measurement. It is relied upon in drug testing, economic policymaking, recruitment, and other decision-making contexts. The first aim of this article is to introduce philosophers to key aspects of psychometrics, namely, classical test theory, item response theory, and construct validity. The second aim is to show how a debate on the nature of psychological attributes manifests in ps…

  • Psychometrics versus Representational Theory of Measurement

    Open Access•Elina Vessonen•ARTICLE•Philosophy of the Social Sciences•2017•Cited by: 3•References: 21

    Erik Angner has argued that simultaneous endorsement of the representational theory of measurement (RTM) and psychometrics leads to inconsistency. His claim rests on an implicit assumption: RTM and psychometrics are full-fledged approaches to measurement. I argue that RTM and psychometrics are only partial approaches that deal with different aspects of measurement, and that therefore simultaneous endorsement of the two is not inconsistent. The ar…

  • Operationalism and realism in psychometrics

    Open Access•Elina Vessonen•ARTICLE•Philosophy Compass•2019•Cited by: 3•References: 58

    Psychometrics is one of the main approaches to social scientific measurement. It is relied upon in drug testing, economic policymaking, recruitment, and other decision-making contexts. The first aim of this article is to introduce philosophers to key aspects of psychometrics, namely, classical test theory, item response theory, and construct validity. The second aim is to show how a debate on the nature of psychological attributes manifests in ps…

  • Psychometrics versus Representational Theory of Measurement

    Open Access•Elina Vessonen•ARTICLE•Philosophy of the Social Sciences•2017•Cited by: 3•References: 21

    Erik Angner has argued that simultaneous endorsement of the representational theory of measurement (RTM) and psychometrics leads to inconsistency. His claim rests on an implicit assumption: RTM and psychometrics are full-fledged approaches to measurement. I argue that RTM and psychometrics are only partial approaches that deal with different aspects of measurement, and that therefore simultaneous endorsement of the two is not inconsistent. The ar…

  • Conceptual engineering and operationalism in psychology

    Open Access•Elina Vessonen•ARTICLE•Synthese•2021•Cited by: 2•References: 42

    This paper applies conceptual engineering to deal with four objections that have been levelled against operationalism in psychology. These objections are: (i) operationalism leads to harmful proliferation of concepts, (ii) operationalism goes hand-in-hand with untenable antirealism, (iii) operationalism leads to arbitrariness in scientific concept formation, and (iv) operationalism is incompatible with the usual conception of scientific measureme…

  • The Complementarity of Psychometrics and the Representational Theory of Measurement

    Open Access•Elina Vessonen•ARTICLE•The British Journal for the…•2020•Cited by: 1•References: 41

    Psychometrics and the representational theory of measurement (RTM) are widely used in social scientific measurement. They are currently pursued largely in isolation from one another. I argue that despite their separation in practice, RTM and psychometrics are complementary approaches, because they can contribute in complementary ways to the establishment of what I argue is a crucial measurement property, namely, representational interpretability.…

  • Psychometrics versus Representational Theory of Measurement

    Open Access•Elina Vessonen•ARTICLE•Philosophy of the Social Sciences•2017•Cited by: 3•References: 21

    Erik Angner has argued that simultaneous endorsement of the representational theory of measurement (RTM) and psychometrics leads to inconsistency. His claim rests on an implicit assumption: RTM and psychometrics are full-fledged approaches to measurement. I argue that RTM and psychometrics are only partial approaches that deal with different aspects of measurement, and that therefore simultaneous endorsement of the two is not inconsistent. The ar…

  • Operationalism and realism in psychometrics

    Open Access•Elina Vessonen•ARTICLE•Philosophy Compass•2019•Cited by: 3•References: 58

    Psychometrics is one of the main approaches to social scientific measurement. It is relied upon in drug testing, economic policymaking, recruitment, and other decision-making contexts. The first aim of this article is to introduce philosophers to key aspects of psychometrics, namely, classical test theory, item response theory, and construct validity. The second aim is to show how a debate on the nature of psychological attributes manifests in ps…

  • The Complementarity of Psychometrics and the Representational Theory of Measurement

    Open Access•Elina Vessonen•ARTICLE•The British Journal for the…•2020•Cited by: 1•References: 41

    Psychometrics and the representational theory of measurement (RTM) are widely used in social scientific measurement. They are currently pursued largely in isolation from one another. I argue that despite their separation in practice, RTM and psychometrics are complementary approaches, because they can contribute in complementary ways to the establishment of what I argue is a crucial measurement property, namely, representational interpretability.…

  • Respectful operationalism

    Open Access•Elina Vessonen•ARTICLE•Theory & Psychology•2021

    I first argue that there are three major currents in the contemporary debate on operationalism. These are: (a) methodologists who criticize operationalism qua philosophy, (b) psychologists who practice operationalization that is allegedly philosophically noncommittal, and (c) critics who claim that psychologists’ validation practices commit them to stronger operationalism than psychologists realize. I then outline respectful operationalism and ar…

  • Conceptual engineering and operationalism in psychology

    Open Access•Elina Vessonen•ARTICLE•Synthese•2021•Cited by: 2•References: 42

    This paper applies conceptual engineering to deal with four objections that have been levelled against operationalism in psychology. These objections are: (i) operationalism leads to harmful proliferation of concepts, (ii) operationalism goes hand-in-hand with untenable antirealism, (iii) operationalism leads to arbitrariness in scientific concept formation, and (iv) operationalism is incompatible with the usual conception of scientific measureme…

Epistemology (5 works) · Philosophy (5 works) · Philosophy and History of Science (5 works) · Psychology (4 works) · Computer Science (3 works) · Mental Health Research Topics (3 works) · Psychometrics (3 works) · Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology (2 works) · Developmental psychology (2 works) · Item response theory (2 works)

Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae