Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Jesús Zamora-Bonilla

Biographic Data

ID1310033
NAMEJesús Zamora-Bonilla
GIVEN NAMESJesús
FAMILY NAMEZamora-Bonilla
SIGNATUREZAMORA-BONILLA J
AFFILIATIONSUniversidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia
ORCID0000-0003-0185-9768
VERIFIEDYes
TOTAL WORKS17
TOTAL CITATIONS24
WORKS AS AUTHOR17
WORKS AS EDITOR0
FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR1998
LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR2024
H-INDEX2
  • Diseases as social problems

    Open Access•Cristian Saborido, Jesús Zamora-Bonilla•ARTICLE•Synthese•2024•Cited by: 2•References: 30

    In this paper we articulate a characterization of the concept of disease as a social problem. We argue that, from a social ontology point of view, diseases are problems that are identified and addressed within the framework of concrete social institutions and practices (those that shape medicine). This approach allows us to overcome the classical distinction between naturalist and normativist approaches in the philosophy of medicine, taking into …

  • El infierno de Byung-Chul Han

    Open Access•Jesús Zamora-Bonilla, Jesús Zamora Bonilla•ARTICLE•SCIO Revista de Filosofía•2022

    Byung-Chul Han es uno de los intelectuales más populares del momento, habiendo basado su éxito, sobre todo, en una especie de crítica filosófica de la civilización de consumo capitalista e hipertecnificada. En este artículo se repasan algunos de los clichés habituales en su obra, para mostrar que en la mayor parte de los casos no suele haber razones para estar de acuerdo con tales críticas, sino que estas responde principalmente a un afán de esno…

  • Inferentialism, degrees of commitment, and ampliative reasoning

    Open Access•Javier González De Prado Salas, Xavier de Donato Rodríguez et al.•ARTICLE•Synthese•2021•References: 31

  • Special issue

    Open Access•Javier González De Prado Salas, Mauricio Suárez et al.•ARTICLE•Synthese•2021•References: 2

  • Inmaculada de Melo-Martín and Kristen Intemann. 2018. The Fight Against Doubt

    Open Access•Jesús Zamora-Bonilla, Jesús Zamora Bonilla•ARTICLE•THEORIA An International Journal…•2020

    Review of: Inmaculada de Melo-Martín and Kristen Intemann. 2018. The Fight Against Doubt: How to Bridge the Gap Between Scientists and the Public

  • The Republic of Science and Its Constitution

    Open Access•Jesús Zamora-Bonilla, Jesús Zamora Bonilla•CHAPTER•The Impact of Critical Rationalism•2019

  • Collective Actors without Collective Minds

    Open Access•Javier González De Prado Salas, Jesús Zamora-Bonilla•ARTICLE•Philosophy of the Social Sciences•2015•Cited by: 4•References: 18

    We present an inferentialist account of collective rationality and intentionality, according to which beliefs and other intentional states are understood in terms of the normative statuses attributed to, and undertaken by, the participants of a discursive practice—namely, their discursive or practical commitments and entitlements. Although these statuses are instituted by the performances and attitudes of the agents, they are not identified with …

  • The nature of co-authorship

    Open Access•Jesús Zamora-Bonilla, Jesús Zamora Bonilla•ARTICLE•Synthese•2014•Cited by: 1•References: 14

  • Why are good theories good? reflections on epistemic values, confirmation, and formal epistemology

    Open Access•Jesús Zamora-Bonilla•ARTICLE•Synthese•2013•Cited by: 1•References: 20

  • Normativity without normativism

    Open Access•Jesús Zamora-Bonilla•ARTICLE•Revista Internacional de Sociología•2013•References: 1

    No disponible

  • Por qué las ciencias sociales son naturales, y por qué no pueden

    Open Access•Jesús Zamora-Bonilla•ARTICLE•Empiria Revista de metodología de…•2012

    It is argued that there are no fundamental ontological nor epistemological differences between the natural and the social sciences, though the social realm is so complex and unstable that it makes it difficult the emergence (and, hence, the discovery) of significant robust regularities. As a suggestion of how social sciences might be ‘naturalised’, an abstract model of normative based behaviour is also presented, such that it is coherent with emp…

  • The Sage handbook of the philosophy of social sciences

    Ian Charles Jarvie, Jesús Zamora-Bonilla•BOOK•The SAGE handbook of the…•2011

    This handbook provides a comprehensive view of the fundamental philosophical and methodological problems characteristic of the social sciences, as well as of the main approaches and school of thought within the discipline. It is a reference for researchers and teachers to employ in their investigations and lectures

  • The Sage Handbook of the Philosophy of Social Sciences

    I C Jarvie, Ian Jarvie et al.•BOOK•The Sage Handbook of the…•2011•Cited by: 14

    Introduction: Philosophical Problems in the Social Sciences: Paradigms, Methodology and Ontology - Ian C Jarvie PART ONE: THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE PHILOSOPHY OF SOCIAL SCIENCE The Philosophy of Social Science from Mandeville to Mannheim - Joseph Agassi Continental Philosophies of the Social Sciences - David Teira The Philosophy of Social Science in the 20th Century: Analytic Traditions: Reflections on the Rationalitatstreit - Paul Roth PART TWO: CE…

  • La adaptación del darwinismo al medio hostil de la ficción audiovisual

    Open Access•Miguel Álvarez-Peralta, Miguel Álvarez Peralta et al.•ARTICLE•ENDOXA•2010

    Este trabajo pretende poner de manifiesto la incompatibilidad entre las formas hegemónicas para elaboración de relatos de ficción audiovisuales de circulación masiva y las características específicas de los hechos que describen las teorías darwinistas. Esta incompatibilidad explica la tendencia a «forzar» la adaptación y selección de hechos evolutivos representados en detrimento del rigor científico y el valor divulgativo de los productos cultura…

  • What's New in the Philosophy of the Social Sciences

    Open Access•Julian Reis, Julian Reiss et al.•ARTICLE•Philosophy of the Social Sciences•2008

  • Optimal Judgment Aggregation

    Open Access•Jesús Zamora-Bonilla, Jesús Zamora Bonilla•ARTICLE•Philosophy of Science•2007•Cited by: 2•References: 1

    The constitution of a collective judgment is analyzed from a contractarian point of view. The optimal collective judgment is defined as the one that maximizes the sum of the utility each member gets from the collective adoption of that judgment. It is argued that judgment aggregation is a different process from the aggregation of information and public deliberation. This entails that the adoption of a collective judgment should not make any ratio…

  • Úteros en alquiler

    Open Access•Jesús Zamora-Bonilla, Jesús Zamora Bonilla•ARTICLE•Isegoría•1998

  • The Sage Handbook of the Philosophy of Social Sciences

    I C Jarvie, Ian Jarvie et al.•BOOK•The Sage Handbook of the…•2011•Cited by: 14

    Introduction: Philosophical Problems in the Social Sciences: Paradigms, Methodology and Ontology - Ian C Jarvie PART ONE: THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE PHILOSOPHY OF SOCIAL SCIENCE The Philosophy of Social Science from Mandeville to Mannheim - Joseph Agassi Continental Philosophies of the Social Sciences - David Teira The Philosophy of Social Science in the 20th Century: Analytic Traditions: Reflections on the Rationalitatstreit - Paul Roth PART TWO: CE…

  • Collective Actors without Collective Minds

    Open Access•Javier González De Prado Salas, Jesús Zamora-Bonilla•ARTICLE•Philosophy of the Social Sciences•2015•Cited by: 4•References: 18

    We present an inferentialist account of collective rationality and intentionality, according to which beliefs and other intentional states are understood in terms of the normative statuses attributed to, and undertaken by, the participants of a discursive practice—namely, their discursive or practical commitments and entitlements. Although these statuses are instituted by the performances and attitudes of the agents, they are not identified with …

  • Diseases as social problems

    Open Access•Cristian Saborido, Jesús Zamora-Bonilla•ARTICLE•Synthese•2024•Cited by: 2•References: 30

    In this paper we articulate a characterization of the concept of disease as a social problem. We argue that, from a social ontology point of view, diseases are problems that are identified and addressed within the framework of concrete social institutions and practices (those that shape medicine). This approach allows us to overcome the classical distinction between naturalist and normativist approaches in the philosophy of medicine, taking into …

  • Optimal Judgment Aggregation

    Open Access•Jesús Zamora-Bonilla, Jesús Zamora Bonilla•ARTICLE•Philosophy of Science•2007•Cited by: 2•References: 1

    The constitution of a collective judgment is analyzed from a contractarian point of view. The optimal collective judgment is defined as the one that maximizes the sum of the utility each member gets from the collective adoption of that judgment. It is argued that judgment aggregation is a different process from the aggregation of information and public deliberation. This entails that the adoption of a collective judgment should not make any ratio…

  • The nature of co-authorship

    Open Access•Jesús Zamora-Bonilla, Jesús Zamora Bonilla•ARTICLE•Synthese•2014•Cited by: 1•References: 14

  • Why are good theories good? reflections on epistemic values, confirmation, and formal epistemology

    Open Access•Jesús Zamora-Bonilla•ARTICLE•Synthese•2013•Cited by: 1•References: 20

  • Úteros en alquiler

    Open Access•Jesús Zamora-Bonilla, Jesús Zamora Bonilla•ARTICLE•Isegoría•1998

  • Optimal Judgment Aggregation

    Open Access•Jesús Zamora-Bonilla, Jesús Zamora Bonilla•ARTICLE•Philosophy of Science•2007•Cited by: 2•References: 1

    The constitution of a collective judgment is analyzed from a contractarian point of view. The optimal collective judgment is defined as the one that maximizes the sum of the utility each member gets from the collective adoption of that judgment. It is argued that judgment aggregation is a different process from the aggregation of information and public deliberation. This entails that the adoption of a collective judgment should not make any ratio…

  • What's New in the Philosophy of the Social Sciences

    Open Access•Julian Reis, Julian Reiss et al.•ARTICLE•Philosophy of the Social Sciences•2008

  • La adaptación del darwinismo al medio hostil de la ficción audiovisual

    Open Access•Miguel Álvarez-Peralta, Miguel Álvarez Peralta et al.•ARTICLE•ENDOXA•2010

    Este trabajo pretende poner de manifiesto la incompatibilidad entre las formas hegemónicas para elaboración de relatos de ficción audiovisuales de circulación masiva y las características específicas de los hechos que describen las teorías darwinistas. Esta incompatibilidad explica la tendencia a «forzar» la adaptación y selección de hechos evolutivos representados en detrimento del rigor científico y el valor divulgativo de los productos cultura…

  • The Sage handbook of the philosophy of social sciences

    Ian Charles Jarvie, Jesús Zamora-Bonilla•BOOK•The SAGE handbook of the…•2011

    This handbook provides a comprehensive view of the fundamental philosophical and methodological problems characteristic of the social sciences, as well as of the main approaches and school of thought within the discipline. It is a reference for researchers and teachers to employ in their investigations and lectures

  • The Sage Handbook of the Philosophy of Social Sciences

    I C Jarvie, Ian Jarvie et al.•BOOK•The Sage Handbook of the…•2011•Cited by: 14

    Introduction: Philosophical Problems in the Social Sciences: Paradigms, Methodology and Ontology - Ian C Jarvie PART ONE: THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE PHILOSOPHY OF SOCIAL SCIENCE The Philosophy of Social Science from Mandeville to Mannheim - Joseph Agassi Continental Philosophies of the Social Sciences - David Teira The Philosophy of Social Science in the 20th Century: Analytic Traditions: Reflections on the Rationalitatstreit - Paul Roth PART TWO: CE…

  • Por qué las ciencias sociales son naturales, y por qué no pueden

    Open Access•Jesús Zamora-Bonilla•ARTICLE•Empiria Revista de metodología de…•2012

    It is argued that there are no fundamental ontological nor epistemological differences between the natural and the social sciences, though the social realm is so complex and unstable that it makes it difficult the emergence (and, hence, the discovery) of significant robust regularities. As a suggestion of how social sciences might be ‘naturalised’, an abstract model of normative based behaviour is also presented, such that it is coherent with emp…

  • Why are good theories good? reflections on epistemic values, confirmation, and formal epistemology

    Open Access•Jesús Zamora-Bonilla•ARTICLE•Synthese•2013•Cited by: 1•References: 20

  • Normativity without normativism

    Open Access•Jesús Zamora-Bonilla•ARTICLE•Revista Internacional de Sociología•2013•References: 1

    No disponible

  • The nature of co-authorship

    Open Access•Jesús Zamora-Bonilla, Jesús Zamora Bonilla•ARTICLE•Synthese•2014•Cited by: 1•References: 14

  • Collective Actors without Collective Minds

    Open Access•Javier González De Prado Salas, Jesús Zamora-Bonilla•ARTICLE•Philosophy of the Social Sciences•2015•Cited by: 4•References: 18

    We present an inferentialist account of collective rationality and intentionality, according to which beliefs and other intentional states are understood in terms of the normative statuses attributed to, and undertaken by, the participants of a discursive practice—namely, their discursive or practical commitments and entitlements. Although these statuses are instituted by the performances and attitudes of the agents, they are not identified with …

  • The Republic of Science and Its Constitution

    Open Access•Jesús Zamora-Bonilla, Jesús Zamora Bonilla•CHAPTER•The Impact of Critical Rationalism•2019

  • Inmaculada de Melo-Martín and Kristen Intemann. 2018. The Fight Against Doubt

    Open Access•Jesús Zamora-Bonilla, Jesús Zamora Bonilla•ARTICLE•THEORIA An International Journal…•2020

    Review of: Inmaculada de Melo-Martín and Kristen Intemann. 2018. The Fight Against Doubt: How to Bridge the Gap Between Scientists and the Public

  • Inferentialism, degrees of commitment, and ampliative reasoning

    Open Access•Javier González De Prado Salas, Xavier de Donato Rodríguez et al.•ARTICLE•Synthese•2021•References: 31

  • Special issue

    Open Access•Javier González De Prado Salas, Mauricio Suárez et al.•ARTICLE•Synthese•2021•References: 2

  • El infierno de Byung-Chul Han

    Open Access•Jesús Zamora-Bonilla, Jesús Zamora Bonilla•ARTICLE•SCIO Revista de Filosofía•2022

    Byung-Chul Han es uno de los intelectuales más populares del momento, habiendo basado su éxito, sobre todo, en una especie de crítica filosófica de la civilización de consumo capitalista e hipertecnificada. En este artículo se repasan algunos de los clichés habituales en su obra, para mostrar que en la mayor parte de los casos no suele haber razones para estar de acuerdo con tales críticas, sino que estas responde principalmente a un afán de esno…

  • Diseases as social problems

    Open Access•Cristian Saborido, Jesús Zamora-Bonilla•ARTICLE•Synthese•2024•Cited by: 2•References: 30

    In this paper we articulate a characterization of the concept of disease as a social problem. We argue that, from a social ontology point of view, diseases are problems that are identified and addressed within the framework of concrete social institutions and practices (those that shape medicine). This approach allows us to overcome the classical distinction between naturalist and normativist approaches in the philosophy of medicine, taking into …

Philosophy (13 works) · Epistemology (11 works) · Philosophy and History of Science (6 works) · Philosophy of science (6 works) · Sociology (6 works) · Computer Science (5 works) · Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (5 works) · Metaphysics (5 works) · Philosophy of language (5 works) · Philosophy (4 works)

Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae