Peter W Hogg
Biographic Data
| ID | 1323169 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Peter W Hogg |
| GIVEN NAMES | Peter W |
| FAMILY NAME | Hogg |
| SIGNATURE | HOGG P W |
| AFFILIATIONS | York University |
| VERIFIED | No |
| TOTAL WORKS | 8 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 0 |
| WORKS AS AUTHOR | 8 |
| WORKS AS EDITOR | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 1976 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2017 |
| H-INDEX | 0 |
Understanding Dialogue Theory
This chapter discusses Charter dialogue theory, tracing its evolution within the academic literature, as well as how it has been interpreted by Canadian courts. The authors define the concept of Charter dialogue, or legislative responses to decisions of Canadian courts involving fundamental human rights and freedoms. They describe the features of the Canadian Charter which make the process of Charter dialogue possible, as well as its limitations.…
Why judges should dissent
This article discusses why judges at intermediate appellate courts should dissent when they are in disagreement with their colleagues as to either the outcome of a case or the reasons given to reach a particular decision. The authors argue that dissenting judgments promote individual judicial responsibility and demonstrate transparency as to how a decision was reached by a panel of judges. They also describe how dissenting judgments have the abil…
Canadian Constitutional Law
When I was asked to give this talk it occurred to me that it might be interesting to think aloud about some of the changes in constitutional law—and in writing about constitutional law—that have occurred since I came to Canada. I am a New Zealander by birth, but I was teaching at the Faculty of Law of Monash University in Melbourne, Australia, when I came to the Osgoode Hall Law School on a one-year visit in the summer of 1970. During that visiti…
The Charter Dialogue between Courts and Legislatures (Or Perhaps the Charter of Rights Isn't Such a Bad Thing after All)
This article responds to the argument that judicial review of legislation under the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms is illegitimate because it is undemocratic. The authors show that Charter cases nearly always can be, and often are, followed by new legislation that still accomplishes the same objectives as the legislation that was struck down. The effect of the Charter is rarely to block a legislative objective, but rather to influence th…
The U.S. Bill of Rights and the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms
Canada's New Charter of Rights
Journal Article Canada’s New Charter of Rights Get access Peter W. Hogg Peter W. Hogg 1Peter Hogg is Professor of Law, Osgoode Hall Law School, York University, Toronto. Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar The American Journal of Comparative Law, Volume 32, Issue 2, Spring 1984, Pages 283–305, https://doi.org/10.2307/840470 Published: 01 April 1984
Freedom of movement of goods, persons, services and capital
(1980). Freedom of movement of goods, persons, services and capital: Canadian case‐law. Journal of European Integration: Vol. 3, The Free Movement of Goods, Persons, Services and Capital in Canada and in the European Community: A Comparison Between Federalism and Supranational Integration, pp. 301-311
Proof of Facts in Constitutional Cases
No prominent works on this page.
Proof of Facts in Constitutional Cases
Freedom of movement of goods, persons, services and capital
(1980). Freedom of movement of goods, persons, services and capital: Canadian case‐law. Journal of European Integration: Vol. 3, The Free Movement of Goods, Persons, Services and Capital in Canada and in the European Community: A Comparison Between Federalism and Supranational Integration, pp. 301-311
The U.S. Bill of Rights and the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms
Canada's New Charter of Rights
Journal Article Canada’s New Charter of Rights Get access Peter W. Hogg Peter W. Hogg 1Peter Hogg is Professor of Law, Osgoode Hall Law School, York University, Toronto. Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar The American Journal of Comparative Law, Volume 32, Issue 2, Spring 1984, Pages 283–305, https://doi.org/10.2307/840470 Published: 01 April 1984
The Charter Dialogue between Courts and Legislatures (Or Perhaps the Charter of Rights Isn't Such a Bad Thing after All)
This article responds to the argument that judicial review of legislation under the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms is illegitimate because it is undemocratic. The authors show that Charter cases nearly always can be, and often are, followed by new legislation that still accomplishes the same objectives as the legislation that was struck down. The effect of the Charter is rarely to block a legislative objective, but rather to influence th…
Canadian Constitutional Law
When I was asked to give this talk it occurred to me that it might be interesting to think aloud about some of the changes in constitutional law—and in writing about constitutional law—that have occurred since I came to Canada. I am a New Zealander by birth, but I was teaching at the Faculty of Law of Monash University in Melbourne, Australia, when I came to the Osgoode Hall Law School on a one-year visit in the summer of 1970. During that visiti…
Understanding Dialogue Theory
This chapter discusses Charter dialogue theory, tracing its evolution within the academic literature, as well as how it has been interpreted by Canadian courts. The authors define the concept of Charter dialogue, or legislative responses to decisions of Canadian courts involving fundamental human rights and freedoms. They describe the features of the Canadian Charter which make the process of Charter dialogue possible, as well as its limitations.…
Why judges should dissent
This article discusses why judges at intermediate appellate courts should dissent when they are in disagreement with their colleagues as to either the outcome of a case or the reasons given to reach a particular decision. The authors argue that dissenting judgments promote individual judicial responsibility and demonstrate transparency as to how a decision was reached by a panel of judges. They also describe how dissenting judgments have the abil…
Law (8 works) · Political science (8 works) · Judicial and Constitutional Studies (6 works) · Sociology (6 works) · Criminal Law and Evidence (5 works) · Law and economics (5 works) · Charter (4 works) · Law (4 works) · Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies (4 works) · Comparative and International Law Studies (2 works)