Kevin M Clermont
Biographic Data
| ID | 1323323 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Kevin M Clermont |
| GIVEN NAMES | Kevin M |
| FAMILY NAME | Clermont |
| SIGNATURE | CLERMONT K M |
| AFFILIATIONS | Cornell University |
| ORCID | 0000-0001-6414-4415 |
| VERIFIED | Yes |
| TOTAL WORKS | 6 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 3 |
| WORKS AS AUTHOR | 6 |
| WORKS AS EDITOR | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2002 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2024 |
| H-INDEX | 1 |
A General Theory of Evidence and Proof
Generalizing Beyond Factfinding
Skirmishing toward a general theory of evidence and proof
Traditional probability fundamentally assumes bivalence and additivity: there is only truth and falsity, whose odds add to one. The consequence is many problems and paradoxes for factfinding, all attributable to the assumptions’ exclusive focus on random uncertainty. By contrast, multivalent belief theory abjures those two assumptions, thereby allowing consideration of epistemic uncertainty. This theory divides the factfinder's state of mind into…
The silliness of magical realism
Relative plausibility, even after countless explanatory articles, remains an underdeveloped model bereft of underlying theory. Multivalent logic, a fully developed and accepted system of logic, comes to the same endpoint as relative plausibility. Multivalent logic would thus provide the missing theory, while it would resolve all the old problems of using traditional probability theory to explain the standards of proof as well as the new problems …
Johan Lindholm, State Procedure and Union Rights
Journal Article Johan Lindholm, State Procedure and Union Rights: A Comparison of the European Union and the United States Get access Johan Lindholm, State Procedure and Union Rights: A Comparison of the European Union and the United States ( Uppsala, Iustus Förlag, 2007), available at http://ssrn.com/abstract=985885 Kevin M. Clermont Kevin M. Clermont *Flanagan Professor of Law, Cornell University Search for other works by this author on: Oxford…
A Comparative View of Standards of Proof
Kevin M. Clermont, Emily Sherwin; A Comparative View of Standards of Proof, The American Journal of Comparative Law, Volume 50, Issue 2, 1 April 2002, Page
A Comparative View of Standards of Proof
Kevin M. Clermont, Emily Sherwin; A Comparative View of Standards of Proof, The American Journal of Comparative Law, Volume 50, Issue 2, 1 April 2002, Page
A Comparative View of Standards of Proof
Kevin M. Clermont, Emily Sherwin; A Comparative View of Standards of Proof, The American Journal of Comparative Law, Volume 50, Issue 2, 1 April 2002, Page
Johan Lindholm, State Procedure and Union Rights
Journal Article Johan Lindholm, State Procedure and Union Rights: A Comparison of the European Union and the United States Get access Johan Lindholm, State Procedure and Union Rights: A Comparison of the European Union and the United States ( Uppsala, Iustus Förlag, 2007), available at http://ssrn.com/abstract=985885 Kevin M. Clermont Kevin M. Clermont *Flanagan Professor of Law, Cornell University Search for other works by this author on: Oxford…
The silliness of magical realism
Relative plausibility, even after countless explanatory articles, remains an underdeveloped model bereft of underlying theory. Multivalent logic, a fully developed and accepted system of logic, comes to the same endpoint as relative plausibility. Multivalent logic would thus provide the missing theory, while it would resolve all the old problems of using traditional probability theory to explain the standards of proof as well as the new problems …
A General Theory of Evidence and Proof
Generalizing Beyond Factfinding
Skirmishing toward a general theory of evidence and proof
Traditional probability fundamentally assumes bivalence and additivity: there is only truth and falsity, whose odds add to one. The consequence is many problems and paradoxes for factfinding, all attributable to the assumptions’ exclusive focus on random uncertainty. By contrast, multivalent belief theory abjures those two assumptions, thereby allowing consideration of epistemic uncertainty. This theory divides the factfinder's state of mind into…
Computer Science (4 works) · Law (4 works) · Political science (4 works) · Epistemology (3 works) · Jury Decision Making Processes (3 works) · Mathematics (3 works) · Philosophy (3 works) · Burden of proof (2 works) · Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction (2 works) · Mathematical economics (2 works)