Greg Scherkoske
Biographic Data
| ID | 1402186 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Greg Scherkoske |
| GIVEN NAMES | Greg |
| FAMILY NAME | Scherkoske |
| SIGNATURE | SCHERKOSKE G |
| AFFILIATIONS | Dalhousie University |
| VERIFIED | No |
| TOTAL WORKS | 4 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 1 |
| AUTHOR COUNT | 4 |
| EDITOR COUNT | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2012 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2020 |
| H-INDEX | 1 |
Should Relational Autonomy Theorists Embrace Republican Freedom Instead: A Commentary on “Nondomination and the Limits of Relational Autonomy” by Danielle M. Wenner
Whither Integrity I: Recent Faces of Integrity1
Despite the fact that most of us value integrity, and despite the fact that we readily understand one another when we talk and argue about it, integrity remains elusive to understand. Considerable scholarly attention has left troubling disagreement on fundamental issues: Is integrity in fact a virtue? If it is, what is it a virtue of? Why exactly should we value integrity? What is the appropriate way to have concern for one's own integrity? Is ha…
Whither Integrity II: Integrity and Impartial Morality
The idea that impartial moral theories - consequentialism and Kantian ethics in particular - were objectionably hostile to a person's integrity was famously championed by Bernard Williams nearly 40 years ago. That Williams''integrity objection' has significantly shaped subsequent moral theorizing is widely acknowledged. It is less widely appreciated how this objection has helped shape recent thinking about the nature and value of integrity itself…
Integrity and Impartial Morality
Among recent criticisms of impartial moral theories, especially in consequentialist and deontological forms, Bernard Williams' integrity objection is perhaps the most tantalizing. This objection is a complaint-at once both general and deep-that impartial moral theories are systematically incapable of finding room for integrity in human life and character. Kantians have made forceful responses to this integrity objection and have moved on. Consequ…
Integrity and Impartial Morality
Among recent criticisms of impartial moral theories, especially in consequentialist and deontological forms, Bernard Williams' integrity objection is perhaps the most tantalizing. This objection is a complaint-at once both general and deep-that impartial moral theories are systematically incapable of finding room for integrity in human life and character. Kantians have made forceful responses to this integrity objection and have moved on. Consequ…
Integrity and Impartial Morality
Among recent criticisms of impartial moral theories, especially in consequentialist and deontological forms, Bernard Williams' integrity objection is perhaps the most tantalizing. This objection is a complaint-at once both general and deep-that impartial moral theories are systematically incapable of finding room for integrity in human life and character. Kantians have made forceful responses to this integrity objection and have moved on. Consequ…
Whither Integrity I: Recent Faces of Integrity1
Despite the fact that most of us value integrity, and despite the fact that we readily understand one another when we talk and argue about it, integrity remains elusive to understand. Considerable scholarly attention has left troubling disagreement on fundamental issues: Is integrity in fact a virtue? If it is, what is it a virtue of? Why exactly should we value integrity? What is the appropriate way to have concern for one's own integrity? Is ha…
Whither Integrity II: Integrity and Impartial Morality
The idea that impartial moral theories - consequentialism and Kantian ethics in particular - were objectionably hostile to a person's integrity was famously championed by Bernard Williams nearly 40 years ago. That Williams''integrity objection' has significantly shaped subsequent moral theorizing is widely acknowledged. It is less widely appreciated how this objection has helped shape recent thinking about the nature and value of integrity itself…
Should Relational Autonomy Theorists Embrace Republican Freedom Instead: A Commentary on “Nondomination and the Limits of Relational Autonomy” by Danielle M. Wenner
Epistemology (4 works) · Philosophy (4 works) · Psychology (4 works) · Social Psychology (4 works) · Law (3 works) · Personal Integrity (3 works) · Philosophical Ethics and Theory (3 works) · Political science (3 works) · Computer Science (2 works) · Environmental ethics (2 works)