Robert Larmer
Biographic Data
| ID | 1402383 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Robert Larmer |
| GIVEN NAMES | Robert |
| FAMILY NAME | Larmer |
| SIGNATURE | LARMER R |
| AFFILIATIONS | University of New Brunswick |
| ORCID | 0000-0001-8526-124X |
| VERIFIED | Yes |
| TOTAL WORKS | 7 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 10 |
| WORKS AS AUTHOR | 7 |
| WORKS AS EDITOR | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 1985 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2022 |
| H-INDEX | 2 |
Locke’s Miracle Mistake
Miracles as Evidence for the Existence of God
In this article, I respond to Frank Jankunis’s criticisms of my arguments concerning the evidential weight events best explained as miracles provide for theism
Interpreting Hume on miracles
Contemporary commentators on Hume's essay, ‘Of miracles’ have increasingly tended to argue that Hume never intended to suggest that testimonial evidence must always be insufficient to justify belief in a miracle. This is in marked contrast to earlier commentators who interpreted Hume as intending to demonstrate that testimonial evidence is incapable in principle of ever establishing rational belief in a miracle. In this article I argue that this …
Miracles, physicalism, and the laws of nature
In his paper ‘Miracles: metaphysics, physics, and physicalism’, 1 Kirk McDermid appears to have two primary goals. The first is to demonstrate that my account of how God might produce a miracle without violating any laws of nature is radically flawed. The second is to suggest two alternative accounts, one suitable for a deterministic world, one suitable for an indeterministic world, which allow for the occurrence of a miracle without violation of…
Miracles and Overall
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content
Miracles, Evidence, and God
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content
Miracles and the Laws of Nature
In discussing the relation between miracles and the laws of nature, it is important to make clear what one means when one employs the terms "miracle" and "law of nature". This is essential, since both terms may be used in a number of different ways. I wish to begin, therefore, by briefly indicating how I shall use these terms. I shall then be in a position t o discuss the relation between these particular concepts of miracles and the laws of natu…
Miracles, Evidence, and God
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content
Miracles and Overall
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content
Miracles and the Laws of Nature
In discussing the relation between miracles and the laws of nature, it is important to make clear what one means when one employs the terms "miracle" and "law of nature". This is essential, since both terms may be used in a number of different ways. I wish to begin, therefore, by briefly indicating how I shall use these terms. I shall then be in a position t o discuss the relation between these particular concepts of miracles and the laws of natu…
Miracles and the Laws of Nature
In discussing the relation between miracles and the laws of nature, it is important to make clear what one means when one employs the terms "miracle" and "law of nature". This is essential, since both terms may be used in a number of different ways. I wish to begin, therefore, by briefly indicating how I shall use these terms. I shall then be in a position t o discuss the relation between these particular concepts of miracles and the laws of natu…
Miracles, Evidence, and God
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content
Miracles and Overall
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content
Miracles, physicalism, and the laws of nature
In his paper ‘Miracles: metaphysics, physics, and physicalism’, 1 Kirk McDermid appears to have two primary goals. The first is to demonstrate that my account of how God might produce a miracle without violating any laws of nature is radically flawed. The second is to suggest two alternative accounts, one suitable for a deterministic world, one suitable for an indeterministic world, which allow for the occurrence of a miracle without violation of…
Interpreting Hume on miracles
Contemporary commentators on Hume's essay, ‘Of miracles’ have increasingly tended to argue that Hume never intended to suggest that testimonial evidence must always be insufficient to justify belief in a miracle. This is in marked contrast to earlier commentators who interpreted Hume as intending to demonstrate that testimonial evidence is incapable in principle of ever establishing rational belief in a miracle. In this article I argue that this …
Miracles as Evidence for the Existence of God
In this article, I respond to Frank Jankunis’s criticisms of my arguments concerning the evidential weight events best explained as miracles provide for theism
Locke’s Miracle Mistake
Epistemology (7 works) · Philosophy (7 works) · Miracle (4 works) · Biblical Studies and Interpretation (3 works) · Law (3 works) · Political science (3 works) · Theology (3 works) · Economics (2 works) · Evolution and Science Education (2 works) · Medieval and Classical Philosophy (2 works)