Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Johanna Kangas

Biographic Data

ID1412263
NAMEJohanna Kangas
GIVEN NAMESJohanna
FAMILY NAMEKangas
SIGNATUREKANGAS J
AFFILIATIONSUniversity of Helsinki
ORCID0000-0003-0808-968X
VERIFIEDYes
TOTAL WORKS6
TOTAL CITATIONS16
WORKS AS AUTHOR6
WORKS AS EDITOR0
FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR2019
LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR2026
H-INDEX3
  • Ambitious forest biodiversity conservation under scarce public funds

    Open Access•Johanna Kangas, Janne S Kotiaho et al.•ARTICLE•Ecological Economics•2026

  • Towards an efficient implementation of the EU biodiversity strategy in forests – An analysis of alternative voluntary conservation mechanisms and selection criteria

    Open Access•Johanna Kangas, Markku Ollikainen•ARTICLE•Forest Policy and Economics•2025•Cited by: 2

  • Reforming a pre-existing biodiversity conservation scheme

    Open Access•Johanna Kangas, Markku Ollikainen•ARTICLE•AMBIO•2023•Cited by: 2•References: 42

    Protecting forests provides potential synergies for both biodiversity conservation and climate change mitigation. Payments for ecosystem services (PES) schemes are commonly used to promote biodiversity conservation in private forests, and including carbon as another target may be a cost-efficient way to promote both goals. We analyse a hypothetical reform on a forest biodiversity PES scheme by supplementing it with a carbon payment paid to landow…

  • A PES scheme promoting forest biodiversity and carbon sequestration

    Open Access•Johanna Kangas, Markku Ollikainen•ARTICLE•Forest Policy and Economics•2022•Cited by: 5•References: 1

    Forests can play a significant role both in halting biodiversity loss and in mitigating climate change. A variety of payments for ecosystem services (PES) schemes exists to promote biodiversity conservation in forests. These schemes could be used to strengthen the role of forests as carbon sinks as well. This paper analyzes the implications of supplementing a PES scheme that targets boreal forest biodiversity with a carbon index. We use a site se…

  • Economic Insights in Ecological Compensations

    Open Access•Johanna Kangas, Markku Ollikainen•ARTICLE•Ecological Economics•2019•Cited by: 3•References: 1

    Biodiversity is decreasing at an alarming rate. Current policies focus on the most valuable species and habitats but cannot stop the degradation occurring in less valuable habitats. One solution is offsetting the loss of biodiversity caused by development projects. The basic idea of biodiversity offsetting is simple: a developer must provide an improvement in biodiversity so that the lost ecological value is compensated for. A banking mechanism f…

  • Institutions for governing biodiversity offsetting

    Open Access•Eeva Primmer, Liisa Varumo et al.•ARTICLE•Land Use Policy•2019•Cited by: 4•References: 42

    Offsets for compensating biodiversity loss are increasingly suggested as a system for allocating responsibilities onto those actors who contribute to the loss. As the mechanism is outlined as a new opportunity, the expectations need to be analyzed relative to the ensuing changes in rights and responsibilities over biodiversity degradation, conservation and restoration. In this paper we conduct an analysis of rights and responsibilities using lite…

  • A PES scheme promoting forest biodiversity and carbon sequestration

    Open Access•Johanna Kangas, Markku Ollikainen•ARTICLE•Forest Policy and Economics•2022•Cited by: 5•References: 1

    Forests can play a significant role both in halting biodiversity loss and in mitigating climate change. A variety of payments for ecosystem services (PES) schemes exists to promote biodiversity conservation in forests. These schemes could be used to strengthen the role of forests as carbon sinks as well. This paper analyzes the implications of supplementing a PES scheme that targets boreal forest biodiversity with a carbon index. We use a site se…

  • Institutions for governing biodiversity offsetting

    Open Access•Eeva Primmer, Liisa Varumo et al.•ARTICLE•Land Use Policy•2019•Cited by: 4•References: 42

    Offsets for compensating biodiversity loss are increasingly suggested as a system for allocating responsibilities onto those actors who contribute to the loss. As the mechanism is outlined as a new opportunity, the expectations need to be analyzed relative to the ensuing changes in rights and responsibilities over biodiversity degradation, conservation and restoration. In this paper we conduct an analysis of rights and responsibilities using lite…

  • Economic Insights in Ecological Compensations

    Open Access•Johanna Kangas, Markku Ollikainen•ARTICLE•Ecological Economics•2019•Cited by: 3•References: 1

    Biodiversity is decreasing at an alarming rate. Current policies focus on the most valuable species and habitats but cannot stop the degradation occurring in less valuable habitats. One solution is offsetting the loss of biodiversity caused by development projects. The basic idea of biodiversity offsetting is simple: a developer must provide an improvement in biodiversity so that the lost ecological value is compensated for. A banking mechanism f…

  • Towards an efficient implementation of the EU biodiversity strategy in forests – An analysis of alternative voluntary conservation mechanisms and selection criteria

    Open Access•Johanna Kangas, Markku Ollikainen•ARTICLE•Forest Policy and Economics•2025•Cited by: 2

  • Reforming a pre-existing biodiversity conservation scheme

    Open Access•Johanna Kangas, Markku Ollikainen•ARTICLE•AMBIO•2023•Cited by: 2•References: 42

    Protecting forests provides potential synergies for both biodiversity conservation and climate change mitigation. Payments for ecosystem services (PES) schemes are commonly used to promote biodiversity conservation in private forests, and including carbon as another target may be a cost-efficient way to promote both goals. We analyse a hypothetical reform on a forest biodiversity PES scheme by supplementing it with a carbon payment paid to landow…

  • Economic Insights in Ecological Compensations

    Open Access•Johanna Kangas, Markku Ollikainen•ARTICLE•Ecological Economics•2019•Cited by: 3•References: 1

    Biodiversity is decreasing at an alarming rate. Current policies focus on the most valuable species and habitats but cannot stop the degradation occurring in less valuable habitats. One solution is offsetting the loss of biodiversity caused by development projects. The basic idea of biodiversity offsetting is simple: a developer must provide an improvement in biodiversity so that the lost ecological value is compensated for. A banking mechanism f…

  • Institutions for governing biodiversity offsetting

    Open Access•Eeva Primmer, Liisa Varumo et al.•ARTICLE•Land Use Policy•2019•Cited by: 4•References: 42

    Offsets for compensating biodiversity loss are increasingly suggested as a system for allocating responsibilities onto those actors who contribute to the loss. As the mechanism is outlined as a new opportunity, the expectations need to be analyzed relative to the ensuing changes in rights and responsibilities over biodiversity degradation, conservation and restoration. In this paper we conduct an analysis of rights and responsibilities using lite…

  • A PES scheme promoting forest biodiversity and carbon sequestration

    Open Access•Johanna Kangas, Markku Ollikainen•ARTICLE•Forest Policy and Economics•2022•Cited by: 5•References: 1

    Forests can play a significant role both in halting biodiversity loss and in mitigating climate change. A variety of payments for ecosystem services (PES) schemes exists to promote biodiversity conservation in forests. These schemes could be used to strengthen the role of forests as carbon sinks as well. This paper analyzes the implications of supplementing a PES scheme that targets boreal forest biodiversity with a carbon index. We use a site se…

  • Reforming a pre-existing biodiversity conservation scheme

    Open Access•Johanna Kangas, Markku Ollikainen•ARTICLE•AMBIO•2023•Cited by: 2•References: 42

    Protecting forests provides potential synergies for both biodiversity conservation and climate change mitigation. Payments for ecosystem services (PES) schemes are commonly used to promote biodiversity conservation in private forests, and including carbon as another target may be a cost-efficient way to promote both goals. We analyse a hypothetical reform on a forest biodiversity PES scheme by supplementing it with a carbon payment paid to landow…

  • Towards an efficient implementation of the EU biodiversity strategy in forests – An analysis of alternative voluntary conservation mechanisms and selection criteria

    Open Access•Johanna Kangas, Markku Ollikainen•ARTICLE•Forest Policy and Economics•2025•Cited by: 2

  • Ambitious forest biodiversity conservation under scarce public funds

    Open Access•Johanna Kangas, Janne S Kotiaho et al.•ARTICLE•Ecological Economics•2026

Biodiversity (6 works) · Forest Management and Policy (6 works) · Ecology (5 works) · Economic and Environmental Valuation (5 works) · Economics (5 works) · Environmental resource management (5 works) · Business (4 works) · Environmental Conservation and Management (4 works) · Biodiversity conservation (3 works) · Biology (3 works)

Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae