Grant N Havers
Biographic Data
| ID | 1444780 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Grant N Havers |
| GIVEN NAMES | Grant N |
| FAMILY NAME | Havers |
| SIGNATURE | HAVERS G N |
| AFFILIATIONS | Trinity Western University |
| VERIFIED | No |
| TOTAL WORKS | 6 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 2 |
| AUTHOR COUNT | 6 |
| EDITOR COUNT | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2009 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2023 |
| H-INDEX | 1 |
Was Spinoza a Pagan
Spinoza once remarked in a letter to his friend Hugo Boxel: “To me the authority of Plato, Aristotle, and Socrates is not worth much.”1 The clarity of this statement has not deterred even experienc
The Straussian-Thomistic Quarrel in Modernity
Leo Strauss is one of the few political philosophers of the twentieth century to appreciate the enduring challenge of revealed religion to philosophy. While most of his contemporaries had written o
Leo Strauss and the Challenge of Revealed Religion
Reading Leo Strauss: A Straussian Distortion of My Book
Perhaps the only important thing which Professor Burns and I agree on is getting Leo Strauss right. This is no simple task, since Strauss often advanced contradictory positions. He also famously co
The Philosophical Rhetoric of Tragedy and Hope
In his study of the lost history of secret philosophical writing, Arthur Melzer cogently and insightfully explains the radical difference between ancient esotericism, which is driven by the assumption that the permanence of the tragic conflict between philosophers and non-philosophers will always necessitate secret writing, and modern esotericism, which rests on the hope that one day a new world of harmonious relation between these two groups wil…
Lincoln and the politics of Christian love
The Straussian-Thomistic Quarrel in Modernity
Leo Strauss is one of the few political philosophers of the twentieth century to appreciate the enduring challenge of revealed religion to philosophy. While most of his contemporaries had written o
The Philosophical Rhetoric of Tragedy and Hope
In his study of the lost history of secret philosophical writing, Arthur Melzer cogently and insightfully explains the radical difference between ancient esotericism, which is driven by the assumption that the permanence of the tragic conflict between philosophers and non-philosophers will always necessitate secret writing, and modern esotericism, which rests on the hope that one day a new world of harmonious relation between these two groups wil…
Lincoln and the politics of Christian love
The Philosophical Rhetoric of Tragedy and Hope
In his study of the lost history of secret philosophical writing, Arthur Melzer cogently and insightfully explains the radical difference between ancient esotericism, which is driven by the assumption that the permanence of the tragic conflict between philosophers and non-philosophers will always necessitate secret writing, and modern esotericism, which rests on the hope that one day a new world of harmonious relation between these two groups wil…
Reading Leo Strauss: A Straussian Distortion of My Book
Perhaps the only important thing which Professor Burns and I agree on is getting Leo Strauss right. This is no simple task, since Strauss often advanced contradictory positions. He also famously co
Leo Strauss and the Challenge of Revealed Religion
The Straussian-Thomistic Quarrel in Modernity
Leo Strauss is one of the few political philosophers of the twentieth century to appreciate the enduring challenge of revealed religion to philosophy. While most of his contemporaries had written o
Was Spinoza a Pagan
Spinoza once remarked in a letter to his friend Hugo Boxel: “To me the authority of Plato, Aristotle, and Socrates is not worth much.”1 The clarity of this statement has not deterred even experienc
Philosophy (5 works) · Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought (5 works) · Epistemology (3 works) · Environmental ethics (2 works) · Law (2 works) · Politics (2 works) · Sociology (2 works) · 1809-1865 (1 works) · 19th century (1 works) · 19th century (1 works)