Wilbert P M Spooren
Biographic Data
| ID | 1453632 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Wilbert P M Spooren |
| GIVEN NAMES | Wilbert P M |
| FAMILY NAME | Spooren |
| SIGNATURE | SPOOREN W P M |
| VERIFIED | No |
| TOTAL WORKS | 3 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 126 |
| AUTHOR COUNT | 3 |
| EDITOR COUNT | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 1992 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2015 |
| H-INDEX | 3 |
Causality and subjectivity in discourse: The meaning and use of causal connectives in spontaneous conversation, chat interactions and written text
Many languages of the world have connectives to express causal relations at the discourse level. Often, language users systematically prefer one lexical item
Coherence relations in a cognitive theory of discourse representation
Toward a taxonomy of coherence relations
Understanding a discourse means constructing a coherent representation of that discourse. Inferring coherence relations, such as cause‐consequence and claim‐argument, is a necessary condition for a discourse representation to be coherent. Despite some descriptively fairly adequate proposals in the literature, there is still no theoretically satisfying account of the links that make a discourse coherent. An adequate account of the relations establ…
Toward a taxonomy of coherence relations
Understanding a discourse means constructing a coherent representation of that discourse. Inferring coherence relations, such as cause‐consequence and claim‐argument, is a necessary condition for a discourse representation to be coherent. Despite some descriptively fairly adequate proposals in the literature, there is still no theoretically satisfying account of the links that make a discourse coherent. An adequate account of the relations establ…
Coherence relations in a cognitive theory of discourse representation
Causality and subjectivity in discourse: The meaning and use of causal connectives in spontaneous conversation, chat interactions and written text
Many languages of the world have connectives to express causal relations at the discourse level. Often, language users systematically prefer one lexical item
Toward a taxonomy of coherence relations
Understanding a discourse means constructing a coherent representation of that discourse. Inferring coherence relations, such as cause‐consequence and claim‐argument, is a necessary condition for a discourse representation to be coherent. Despite some descriptively fairly adequate proposals in the literature, there is still no theoretically satisfying account of the links that make a discourse coherent. An adequate account of the relations establ…
Coherence relations in a cognitive theory of discourse representation
Causality and subjectivity in discourse: The meaning and use of causal connectives in spontaneous conversation, chat interactions and written text
Many languages of the world have connectives to express causal relations at the discourse level. Often, language users systematically prefer one lexical item
Linguistics (3 works) · Philosophy (3 works) · Psychology (3 works) · Cognitive psychology (2 works) · Cognitive science (2 works) · Coherence (philosophical gambling strategy (2 works) · Coherence theory (2 works) · Epistemology (2 works) · Language, Metaphor, and Cognition (2 works) · Mathematics (2 works)