Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Dietmar Fehr

Biographic Data

ID1454329
NAMEDietmar Fehr
GIVEN NAMESDietmar
FAMILY NAMEFehr
SIGNATUREFEHR D
AFFILIATIONSUniversity of Stuttgart
ORCID0000-0001-9735-390X
VERIFIEDYes
TOTAL WORKS4
TOTAL CITATIONS19
AUTHOR COUNT4
EDITOR COUNT0
FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR2004
LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR2025
H-INDEX3
  • Misperceiving economic success: Experimental Evidence on Meritocratic Beliefs and Inequality Acceptance

    Open Access•Dietmar Fehr, Martin Vollmann•ARTICLE•The Journal of Economic Inequality•2025•References: 9

    Meritocratic beliefs are often invoked as justification for inequality. We provide evidence on how meritocratic beliefs are shaped by economic rewards and how they contribute to the moral justification of inequality. In a large-scale survey experiment in the US, we show that economic rewards cause a change in beliefs about success depending on effort rather than luck. Exploiting exogenous variation in meritocratic beliefs in a two-stage analysis …

  • Poor and Rational: Decision-Making under Scarcity

    Dietmar Fehr, Günther Fink et al.•ARTICLE•Journal of Political Economy•2022•Cited by: 3•References: 2

  • Social Distance and Trust: Experimental Evidence from a Slum in Cairo

    Christine Binzel, Dietmar Fehr•ARTICLE•Journal of Development Economics•2013•Cited by: 6•References: 10

  • Partner Selection in Public Goods Experiments

    Open Access•Giorgio Coricelli, Dietmar Fehr et al.•ARTICLE•Journal of Conflict Resolution•2004•Cited by: 10•References: 17

    The effect of introducing costly partner selection for the voluntary contribution to a public good is examined. Participants are in six sequences of five rounds of a two-person public good game in partner design. At the end of each sequence, they can select a new partner out of six group members. Unidirectional and bidirectional partner selection mechanisms are introduced and compared to controls with random partner rematching. Results demonstrat…

  • Partner Selection in Public Goods Experiments

    Open Access•Giorgio Coricelli, Dietmar Fehr et al.•ARTICLE•Journal of Conflict Resolution•2004•Cited by: 10•References: 17

    The effect of introducing costly partner selection for the voluntary contribution to a public good is examined. Participants are in six sequences of five rounds of a two-person public good game in partner design. At the end of each sequence, they can select a new partner out of six group members. Unidirectional and bidirectional partner selection mechanisms are introduced and compared to controls with random partner rematching. Results demonstrat…

  • Social Distance and Trust: Experimental Evidence from a Slum in Cairo

    Christine Binzel, Dietmar Fehr•ARTICLE•Journal of Development Economics•2013•Cited by: 6•References: 10

  • Poor and Rational: Decision-Making under Scarcity

    Dietmar Fehr, Günther Fink et al.•ARTICLE•Journal of Political Economy•2022•Cited by: 3•References: 2

  • Partner Selection in Public Goods Experiments

    Open Access•Giorgio Coricelli, Dietmar Fehr et al.•ARTICLE•Journal of Conflict Resolution•2004•Cited by: 10•References: 17

    The effect of introducing costly partner selection for the voluntary contribution to a public good is examined. Participants are in six sequences of five rounds of a two-person public good game in partner design. At the end of each sequence, they can select a new partner out of six group members. Unidirectional and bidirectional partner selection mechanisms are introduced and compared to controls with random partner rematching. Results demonstrat…

  • Social Distance and Trust: Experimental Evidence from a Slum in Cairo

    Christine Binzel, Dietmar Fehr•ARTICLE•Journal of Development Economics•2013•Cited by: 6•References: 10

  • Poor and Rational: Decision-Making under Scarcity

    Dietmar Fehr, Günther Fink et al.•ARTICLE•Journal of Political Economy•2022•Cited by: 3•References: 2

  • Misperceiving economic success: Experimental Evidence on Meritocratic Beliefs and Inequality Acceptance

    Open Access•Dietmar Fehr, Martin Vollmann•ARTICLE•The Journal of Economic Inequality•2025•References: 9

    Meritocratic beliefs are often invoked as justification for inequality. We provide evidence on how meritocratic beliefs are shaped by economic rewards and how they contribute to the moral justification of inequality. In a large-scale survey experiment in the US, we show that economic rewards cause a change in beliefs about success depending on effort rather than luck. Exploiting exogenous variation in meritocratic beliefs in a two-stage analysis …

Economics (3 works) · Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies (3 works) · Psychology (3 works) · Social Psychology (3 works) · Social Psychology (3 works) · Computer Science (2 works) · Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (2 works) · Income, Poverty, and Inequality (2 works) · Microeconomics (2 works) · Public economics (2 works)

Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae