Ilse Oosterlaken

Biographic Data

ID145864
NAMEIlse Oosterlaken
GIVEN NAMESIlse
FAMILY NAMEOosterlaken
SIGNATUREOOSTERLAKEN I
AFFILIATIONSDelft University of Technology
VERIFIEDNo
TOTAL WORKS6
TOTAL CITATIONS11
WORKS AS AUTHOR4
WORKS AS EDITOR2
FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR2011
LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR2015
H-INDEX1

  • Responsible Innovation 2

    Bert‐Jaap Koops, Bert-Jaap Koops et al.EDITORBOOKResponsible Innovation 22015

  • Economic Complexity and Human Development

    Ilse OosterlakenARTICLEJournal of Human Development2015

    Although the title of this book does not contain the word ‘innovation’, this is what the book is largely about—disentangling the complex and diverse ways in which innovation, structural economic ch

  • Technologies of Choice? ICTs, Development and the Capabilities Approach

    Ilse OosterlakenARTICLEJournal of Human Development2014Cited by: 1

    Technologies of Choice? ICTs, Development and the Capabilities Approach." Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, 15(1), pp. 102–103

  • Is Pogge a Capability Theorist in Disguise?

    Open AccessIlse OosterlakenARTICLEEthical Theory and Moral Practice2013

    Thomas Pogge answers the question if the capability approach can be justified with a firm ‘no’. Amongst others, he ridicules capability theorists for demanding compensation for each and every possible natural difference between people, including hair types. Not only does Pogge, so this paper argues, misconstrue the difference between the capability approach and Rawlsian resourcism. Even worse: he is actually implicitly relying on the idea of capa…

  • The Capability Approach, Technology and Design

    Open AccessIlse Oosterlaken, Jeroen Van Den HovenEDITORBOOKThe Capability Approach,…2012

  • Inserting Technology in the Relational Ontology of Sen's Capability Approach

    Ilse OosterlakenARTICLEJournal of Human Development2011Cited by: 10References: 14

    In the July 2009 issue of this journal, Smith and Seward presented a critical realist ontology of human capabilities. Using insights from philosophy of technology/science and technology studies, it is argued that their ontology can and should be extended; not only individuals and social structures, but also technological artifacts should be recognized as important constituents of human capabilities