Mark Shroder
Biographic Data
| ID | 1471454 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Mark Shroder |
| GIVEN NAMES | Mark |
| FAMILY NAME | Shroder |
| SIGNATURE | SHRODER M |
| AFFILIATIONS | United States Department of Housing and Urban Development |
| VERIFIED | No |
| TOTAL WORKS | 5 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 20 |
| AUTHOR COUNT | 5 |
| EDITOR COUNT | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 1995 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2005 |
| H-INDEX | 3 |
Moving to Opportunity: The Demonstration's Design and its Effects on Mobility
Poverty concentration in urban neighbourhoods may have detrimental long-term effects on residents. The Moving to Opportunity (MTO) experiment in the US randomly assigned high-poverty public housing residents to a programme that subsidised occupancy in non-poor areas, permitting controlled analysis of neighbourhood impacts. In this paper, MTO data are used to answer the following questions. How much impact can a one-time intervention have on the s…
Locational Constraint, Housing Counseling, and Successful Lease-up in a Randomized Housing Voucher Experiment
What Makes a Landlord? Ownership of Real Estate by US Households
Households supply about three-quarters of US rental housing. The paper examines the real estate investment decision and the proportion of wealth invested in real estate. Hypotheses drawn primarily from the real estate finance literature about the role of wealth, expected inflation, human capital, income tax rates, race, health, risk aversion and inheritance are tested against data from the Health and Retirement Study. Wealth has a powerful non-li…
The Social Experiment Market
In social experiments, individuals, households, or organizations are randomly assigned to two or more policy interventions. Elsewhere, we have summarized 143 experiments completed by autumn 1996. Here, we use the information we have gathered on these experiments and findings from informal telephone interviews to investigate the social experiment market--the buyers and sellers in the market that governs the production of experiments. We discuss ta…
Games the States Don't Play: Welfare Benefits and the Theory of Fiscal Federalism
Fiscal federalism theory predicts that states will behave strategically in welfare programs because voter demand for welfare is sensitive to tax price, while the tax price itself changes because of welfare-induced migration. This paper tests these propositions on AFDC in the United States for a panel from 1982-88 using new models for the determination of the recipiency ratio (the tax price) and composite neighbors. The data do not support any sub…
Locational Constraint, Housing Counseling, and Successful Lease-up in a Randomized Housing Voucher Experiment
Moving to Opportunity: The Demonstration's Design and its Effects on Mobility
Poverty concentration in urban neighbourhoods may have detrimental long-term effects on residents. The Moving to Opportunity (MTO) experiment in the US randomly assigned high-poverty public housing residents to a programme that subsidised occupancy in non-poor areas, permitting controlled analysis of neighbourhood impacts. In this paper, MTO data are used to answer the following questions. How much impact can a one-time intervention have on the s…
The Social Experiment Market
In social experiments, individuals, households, or organizations are randomly assigned to two or more policy interventions. Elsewhere, we have summarized 143 experiments completed by autumn 1996. Here, we use the information we have gathered on these experiments and findings from informal telephone interviews to investigate the social experiment market--the buyers and sellers in the market that governs the production of experiments. We discuss ta…
Games the States Don't Play: Welfare Benefits and the Theory of Fiscal Federalism
Fiscal federalism theory predicts that states will behave strategically in welfare programs because voter demand for welfare is sensitive to tax price, while the tax price itself changes because of welfare-induced migration. This paper tests these propositions on AFDC in the United States for a panel from 1982-88 using new models for the determination of the recipiency ratio (the tax price) and composite neighbors. The data do not support any sub…
The Social Experiment Market
In social experiments, individuals, households, or organizations are randomly assigned to two or more policy interventions. Elsewhere, we have summarized 143 experiments completed by autumn 1996. Here, we use the information we have gathered on these experiments and findings from informal telephone interviews to investigate the social experiment market--the buyers and sellers in the market that governs the production of experiments. We discuss ta…
What Makes a Landlord? Ownership of Real Estate by US Households
Households supply about three-quarters of US rental housing. The paper examines the real estate investment decision and the proportion of wealth invested in real estate. Hypotheses drawn primarily from the real estate finance literature about the role of wealth, expected inflation, human capital, income tax rates, race, health, risk aversion and inheritance are tested against data from the Health and Retirement Study. Wealth has a powerful non-li…
Locational Constraint, Housing Counseling, and Successful Lease-up in a Randomized Housing Voucher Experiment
Moving to Opportunity: The Demonstration's Design and its Effects on Mobility
Poverty concentration in urban neighbourhoods may have detrimental long-term effects on residents. The Moving to Opportunity (MTO) experiment in the US randomly assigned high-poverty public housing residents to a programme that subsidised occupancy in non-poor areas, permitting controlled analysis of neighbourhood impacts. In this paper, MTO data are used to answer the following questions. How much impact can a one-time intervention have on the s…
Economics (5 works) · Housing Market and Economics (3 works) · Public economics (3 works) · Business (2 works) · Demographic economics (2 works) · Economic growth (2 works) · Engineering (2 works) · Finance (2 works) · Finance (2 works) · Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics (2 works)